2:42 True. Protected ng laws yun karaparatan ng mga predators kesa victims. Humuhupa yun interes ng publiko at sa tagal napupunta lang sa wala.Kaya tuloy ang ligaya at back to their normal lives again at tuloy tuloy pa rin sa kanilang gawain at wala naman silang need harapin na mga consequences for their actions. Bagkus e mas lalo pang lalakas ang loob na gumawa ng masama.
Pero sa story na yan, nagsinungaling yung boy ng ilang beses di ba? At nong totoo na ang sinabi niya, wala ng naniwala sa kanya. And the wolf didn't attack the boy. It attacked the sheep.
The resson it was dropped was because DOJ already filed a case and its overkill to file another one. So dont be stu$@d and stop your a$$f&@# judgement.
Pwede na na technical itong si Sandro. Maybe he wasn't able to establish enough proofs to boost his claims. Ganyan ang batas kapag magaling ang lawyer mo. Maybe Sandro should get another lawyer or gather more evidences
Hindi pa naman tapos. Dinismiss lang itong particular case na to kasi redundant na. Siguro kumbaga yun elements ng kasong to, nandun na rin sa rape case. So I dont think they got away with it. I get the judge’s point. Also, in this case, the Muhlachs are most likely richer and have more connections than the 2 “independent contractors”.
Ang resolution ay kaugnay sa motion to quash na isinumite ng kampo nina Cruz at Nones noong January 9, 2025.
Base sa resolution, meron nang kasong rape through sexual assault na isinampa laban sa dalawang independent contractors sa Department of Justice (DOJ) kaya "overkill" na itong kasong acts of lasciviousness.
hindi naman dismissed ang kaso, yung isa lang kasi redundant na. Meaning nagfile na ng matinding kaso so no need for the second case kaya dismissed based on technicality.
Normal process naman yan pag may multiple cases.. tinatanggal ung mga case na redundant or mahina ang evidence. Tinitira ung feeling ng judges ay valid at dapat itrial..
sa MTC lang itong nadismissed, up to 6 months na kulong lang penalty. pero yung RAPE charge ang hinhintay na resolution sa DOJ, kapag yun ang umakyat sa korte mas matagal na kulong ang parusa at usually no recommended bail pa, kaya abang abang lang
.jpg)
Sayang ang parusa for that. Dapat i-add sa parusa sa case na rape. Para mas mahaba ang sistensya.
ReplyDeleteLike i said before, nothing will come out of this lawsuit :D :D :D Because in penas, the whistleblowers are the one that go to jail ;) ;) ;)
ReplyDeleteThe sad reality in our country. 😔
Delete“…are the ones who go to jail.”
DeleteNakaka lungkot. May pera na yan sila at may pangalan ung family pero wala pa rin what more ung mga Tao walang Laban.
ReplyDeleteKawawa naman
ReplyDeletetax payers wasted dun sa senate hearing nila.... gusto lang mag grandstand ng mga senators na walang amabag sa bayan kundi magpamedia eme
ReplyDeleteLUTO!!!! Kawawa mga maliliit na tao. Kung ito may pera na ganyan pa, pano pa yung walang pera???
ReplyDeleteMas isa pang Rape case
ReplyDeleteWalang bail yan
2:42 True. Protected ng laws yun karaparatan ng mga predators kesa victims. Humuhupa yun interes ng publiko at sa tagal napupunta lang sa wala.Kaya tuloy ang ligaya at back to their normal lives again at tuloy tuloy pa rin sa kanilang gawain at wala naman silang need harapin na mga consequences for their actions. Bagkus e mas lalo pang lalakas ang loob na gumawa ng masama.
ReplyDeleteTama lang, overkill na. Sana maparusahan tlga ang may sala otherwise kawawa ang biktima
ReplyDeletethe boy who cried wolf! justice for the wolf...
ReplyDeletePero sa story na yan, nagsinungaling yung boy ng ilang beses di ba? At nong totoo na ang sinabi niya, wala ng naniwala sa kanya. And the wolf didn't attack the boy. It attacked the sheep.
DeleteThe resson it was dropped was because DOJ already filed a case and its overkill to file another one. So dont be stu$@d and stop your a$$f&@# judgement.
Deletethis is really sad
ReplyDeleteMay ongoing rape case pa naman. The court just decided na enough na yung isang kaso. Sakop na niya ang acts of lasciviousness.
ReplyDeleteSo yung sa r*pe case makukulong sila?
ReplyDeletePag mapatunayan yes
DeletePwede na na technical itong si Sandro. Maybe he wasn't able to establish enough proofs to boost his claims. Ganyan ang batas kapag magaling ang lawyer mo. Maybe Sandro should get another lawyer or gather more evidences
ReplyDeleteno, I think naka kasi na kasi or nakapaloob na sa unang kaso na finile niya so no need for this other case.
DeleteAs someone who was falsely accused of sexual harassment, I learned to give the benefit of the doubt. Hindi lahat nang pa victim ay totoong victim.
ReplyDeleteThis is true. Pero ikaw pa mababash dito maya maya
Delete6:33 hindi nman da who yang mga Muhlach kaya nakakahiya din kaya magclaim ng r@p€ tapos lalaki ka pa at aspiring actor. But I still believe you.
DeleteSad! Truly sad that these dirty rich people can just get away with such rape crime against so many aspiring young men!
ReplyDeleteHindi pa naman tapos. Dinismiss lang itong particular case na to kasi redundant na. Siguro kumbaga yun elements ng kasong to, nandun na rin sa rape case. So I dont think they got away with it. I get the judge’s point. Also, in this case, the Muhlachs are most likely richer and have more connections than the 2 “independent contractors”.
DeleteAng resolution ay kaugnay sa motion to quash na isinumite ng kampo nina Cruz at Nones noong January 9, 2025.
ReplyDeleteBase sa resolution, meron nang kasong rape through sexual assault na isinampa laban sa dalawang independent contractors sa Department of Justice (DOJ) kaya "overkill" na itong kasong acts of lasciviousness.
hindi naman dismissed ang kaso, yung isa lang kasi redundant na. Meaning nagfile na ng matinding kaso so no need for the second case kaya dismissed based on technicality.
ReplyDeleteOne of charges meaning di pa rin sila abswelto. Merong Isang didiin na kaso s kanila so don’t celebrate early mga teh
ReplyDeleteWith all the DNA testing, if there was indeed penetration that happened, they can easily swipe his backdoor to check for the DNA of the 2 culprits..
ReplyDeleteactually walang proof na may penetration. tested already and it failed
DeleteNormal process naman yan pag may multiple cases.. tinatanggal ung mga case na redundant or mahina ang evidence. Tinitira ung feeling ng judges ay valid at dapat itrial..
ReplyDeletesa MTC lang itong nadismissed, up to 6 months na kulong lang penalty. pero yung RAPE charge ang hinhintay na resolution sa DOJ, kapag yun ang umakyat sa korte mas matagal na kulong ang parusa at usually no recommended bail pa, kaya abang abang lang
ReplyDelete