Yes! OMG the headline sounded like the case was dismissed and that’s the end of the story. grabe nakakainit ng ulo. whatever happened to responsible journalism? A major newspaper seemingly siding with mol*sters. disgusting!
Mga writers/journalists nakikisali na ba sa clickbait ng mga social media influencers? At isa pa, nakakainis lang sa bansa natin, kahit sampung patong patong pang kaso ang isampa mo, ni isa sa kalahati hindi ma case closed. Our justice system is shitty, kaya nkakaawa ang mga mahihirap na wlang pera mgsampa ng kaso kasi kung public defender ka lang waley, basura agad kaso mo, pahopeful sila sau to get justice but magging cold case nlang din. For sure libo libo ang cold cases ntin.
Yung kung sino dapat most credible source ng news e sila pa nangunguna gumawa ng misleading/clickbaity articles. Kaya wala na ako tiwala sa newspaper/site na yan at dun sa kalaban nya
May pagka-tabloid naman talaga datingan kaya marami nanamang t*ngang Pinoy na hindi nagbabasa ng article or mahina sa reading comprehension ang akala e winner na yung mga bakla.
Hello?!?!? Do you now know that the title of an article is the most headline grabbing part of it? Meaning, most people would have already formed their opinions based on that title; oftentimes, skipping the reading of the entire article. They have become like a chismis news source. Ewwwww.
758 For me, ang mali sa headline ng inquirer, hindi yung case ang dismissed (like yung inilagay nila sa title article) but yung isang charge lang sa kaso, yun yung dinismiss.
11:19 isa ka pang ta**a. Headline meaning "heading or title at the top of an article or page". Regardless kung malaki o maliit na balita. Aral-aral din pag may time.
7:58 Para sa mga Tulad mo Kaya may ganyang headline. Yung lang Ang binabasa. Did you even read the whole post of Sandro? If you did then you didn’t have to ask Kung ano Ang Mali.
Inquirer used to be a respectable and trusted broadsheet. Back in circa 2000 when I was in college, ito lang yung binabasa kong dyaryo. Pero nong tinanggal nila yung Kikomachine ni Manix, I stopped reading it.
It's now a SHILL publication. Tadtad ang buong screen mo ng ads ni Bong Revilla. Ni hindi mo maclose lahat. Tadtad ang article ng lahat ng fake news advertorials, you can't even read like a normal person without going through 10 - 20 ads. Papuri advertorials kay Camille Villar, not to mention papuri 'news' about the big corporations which they don't even bother to tag as advertisements or branding. Inquirer.net is an Adspaper.
Limited ang number of words na pwedeng ilagay sa title, hindi naman pwedeng ilagay na one of the charges lang yan at tuloy pa rin ang ibang kaso. Wala namang "lie" dun so it is not misleading
1032 Something like "Court dismisses one of the charges in Sandro Muhlach's case vs. Nones & Cruz
Yan hindi misleading kasi kung icocomprehend mo, hindi yung case yung dinismiss kungdi yung isang charge na kasama sa case na yun. Basahin na lang yung article kung anong charge yun.
Tama naman title naka specify naman kung anong case na dismiss. Well, kung di ka familiar na mraming cases na naka file you will think na yung case against the two ay na dismiss at di na sila mananagot kay Sandro
The Fall of Inquirer. Dati 'class' ang printed newspaper na to, compared sa Manila Bulletin which I felt was more masa (kasi sa Classified Ads na nakailang trabaho ako tenkyu). Now it's an unreliable online adspace with social climbing and bong revilla's stupid face all over the corners.
Buti pa dito sa FP, tama ang headline na ginamit sa previous post “Dismisses one of the charges”. Kaya bilib ako dito sa FP eh, no fake news, very specific and accurate ang binabalita.
Asus… may hatol na ba ang korte? Maka perpetrators din tong Sandro. Proof mo puro hearsay. Bash niyo na ako pero hindi ako convinced sa accusations niya.
Question lang, of age naman si Sandro when he went inside the hotel room bakit parang ang treatment sa kanya menor de edad na walang choice to say no on drugs offered to him and the advanced.
Hindi na yata sila owned ng mga PRIETO kaya ganyan na low quality journalism na. And nag pass away na mom ni Tessa. Dati I would subscribe SUNDAY INQUIRER. My happy pill sarap magbasa noon.
.jpg)
.jpg)
Yes! OMG the headline sounded like the case was dismissed and that’s the end of the story. grabe nakakainit ng ulo. whatever happened to responsible journalism? A major newspaper seemingly siding with mol*sters. disgusting!
ReplyDeleteMga writers/journalists nakikisali na ba sa clickbait ng mga social media influencers? At isa pa, nakakainis lang sa bansa natin, kahit sampung patong patong pang kaso ang isampa mo, ni isa sa kalahati hindi ma case closed. Our justice system is shitty, kaya nkakaawa ang mga mahihirap na wlang pera mgsampa ng kaso kasi kung public defender ka lang waley, basura agad kaso mo, pahopeful sila sau to get justice but magging cold case nlang din. For sure libo libo ang cold cases ntin.
DeleteInquirer kakadisappoint kayo! Fact check muna bago mag publish.
ReplyDeleteYung kung sino dapat most credible source ng news e sila pa nangunguna gumawa ng misleading/clickbaity articles. Kaya wala na ako tiwala sa newspaper/site na yan at dun sa kalaban nya
ReplyDeleteNaka ilang palmak na etong tabloid na eto. Oo tabloid kse nagiging cheap at fake news na.
ReplyDeleteIt is really misleading. Case dismissed means wala ng kaso.
ReplyDeleteTama naman ang inquirer basahin nyo nalang yung article kasi title lang naman yan alangan naman sa title ibuo na ang storya masyadong mahaba.
ReplyDeleteMay pagka-tabloid naman talaga datingan kaya marami nanamang t*ngang Pinoy na hindi nagbabasa ng article or mahina sa reading comprehension ang akala e winner na yung mga bakla.
DeleteMsli ang Inquirer at mali ka rin. Misleading nga ang headline. Saan napunta ang comprehension mo?
Delete6:57 Sige nga anong mali sa headline? Wag mong dagdagan sabihin mo lang kung anong mali!
Delete4:57 you need to know the meaning of the word MISLEADING jusmio isa ka pa, hindi nga ‘tama’ yung ganyan!
DeleteHello?!?!? Do you now know that the title of an article is the most headline grabbing part of it? Meaning, most people would have already formed their opinions based on that title; oftentimes, skipping the reading of the entire article. They have become like a chismis news source. Ewwwww.
Delete0758 misleading nga, yun ang mali. nag grade 2 ka ba?
Delete758 For me, ang mali sa headline ng inquirer, hindi yung case ang dismissed (like yung inilagay nila sa title article) but yung isang charge lang sa kaso, yun yung dinismiss.
Delete657 headline talaga? Bakit malaking istorya ba iyan para maging headline?
Delete11:19 isa ka pang ta**a. Headline meaning "heading or title at the top of an article or page". Regardless kung malaki o maliit na balita. Aral-aral din pag may time.
DeleteHahaha, nagkalat na nman nga kashungahan ang iba dito at may gana pang mamuna! 🤣 Aral muna bago chismis mga accla.
Delete7:58 Para sa mga Tulad mo Kaya may ganyang headline. Yung lang Ang binabasa. Did you even read the whole post of Sandro? If you did then you didn’t have to ask Kung ano Ang Mali.
Deletesunog si 11:19 ha ha ha please apply ointment to burnt area emeeee..
DeleteSi 4:57 at 7:58 ang mga dahilan kung bakit bagsak ang Pilipinas sa reading comprehension. Nakikipagtalo pa e mali nga.
DeleteButi may pera sila Sandro to pursue the case noh? Imagine kung mangyare ‘to sa baguhang artista na walang money, power at connections. Kawawa naman.
ReplyDeleteMadami stalls ang muhlach ensaymada mabenta ang ensaymada nila, si Nino nag ma manage they also have building/ apartments sa Quezon city
DeleteInquirer used to be a respectable and trusted broadsheet. Back in circa 2000 when I was in college, ito lang yung binabasa kong dyaryo. Pero nong tinanggal nila yung Kikomachine ni Manix, I stopped reading it.
ReplyDeleteIt's now a SHILL publication. Tadtad ang buong screen mo ng ads ni Bong Revilla. Ni hindi mo maclose lahat. Tadtad ang article ng lahat ng fake news advertorials, you can't even read like a normal person without going through 10 - 20 ads. Papuri advertorials kay Camille Villar, not to mention papuri 'news' about the big corporations which they don't even bother to tag as advertisements or branding. Inquirer.net is an Adspaper.
DeleteYung na-dismiss kasi, hindi aligned sa charge na yun.
ReplyDeleteLimited ang number of words na pwedeng ilagay sa title, hindi naman pwedeng ilagay na one of the charges lang yan at tuloy pa rin ang ibang kaso. Wala namang "lie" dun so it is not misleading
ReplyDeletejusko 🫣 isa pa to, ewan ko sa inyo
DeleteDapat sana one of the cases na lang. parang clickbait kasi.
ReplyDeleteNot one of the cases but one of the charges kasi hindi clear yung prinesent na evidences dun sa charge na dinismiss.
DeleteDami kasing tinamad magbasa e. Kung tutuusin, madali lang namang intindihin yung sitwasyon.
ReplyDeleteWalang ginawang batas ang mga senators jan? Jinggoy, nakichismis ka lang hindi ka gumawa ng batas para makulong na ang dalawang baks!
ReplyDeleteHindi na kasi talk of the town sis kaya yung mga senador move on na
DeleteSa true na pa tabloid na yang Inquirer
ReplyDeleteThat’s why it’s called title. Ano ineexpect niya? Iisa isahin yung kaso sa title pa lang? Magalit siya kung yung article e mali!
ReplyDeleteIn short click bait title na ginagawa ng karamihan ng mga tabloid lol
Delete1:32 then give it a better title.
Delete1032 Something like "Court dismisses one of the charges in Sandro Muhlach's case vs. Nones & Cruz
DeleteYan hindi misleading kasi kung icocomprehend mo, hindi yung case yung dinismiss kungdi yung isang charge na kasama sa case na yun. Basahin na lang yung article kung anong charge yun.
i agree 6:24 this would have been a better headline.
Delete10:32 spoon feeding teh? use ur brain sometimes
Not only Inquirer but marami websites have same headline na implied na nadrop yun kaso. Parang mind conditioning nangyayari tuloy,
ReplyDeleteTama naman title naka specify naman kung anong case na dismiss. Well, kung di ka familiar na mraming cases na naka file you will think na yung case against the two ay na dismiss at di na sila mananagot kay Sandro
ReplyDeleteWala namang Mali. Ano ba gusto nila yong title na sobrang haba na explain talaga na isang kaso lang ang dismiss at may isa pang on going? Huh!
ReplyDeleteIto ang title ng rappler which is not misleading.
DeleteCourt dismisses acts of lasciviousness charges vs Nones, Cruz in Sandro Muhlach case
Magkaiba kasi ang case vs. charges
The Fall of Inquirer. Dati 'class' ang printed newspaper na to, compared sa Manila Bulletin which I felt was more masa (kasi sa Classified Ads na nakailang trabaho ako tenkyu). Now it's an unreliable online adspace with social climbing and bong revilla's stupid face all over the corners.
ReplyDeleteJournalism in this country continues to devolve.
ReplyDeleteWala ng pinagkaiba sa mga journalist wannabes na, tiktokers, youtubers, etc.
So sad for this generation. Hindi na nila na witness ang de kalidad na journalism.
ReplyDeleteButi pa dito sa FP, tama ang headline na ginamit sa previous post “Dismisses one of the charges”. Kaya bilib ako dito sa FP eh, no fake news, very specific and accurate ang binabalita.
ReplyDeleteAsus… may hatol na ba ang korte? Maka perpetrators din tong Sandro. Proof mo puro hearsay. Bash niyo na ako pero hindi ako convinced sa accusations niya.
ReplyDeleteQuestion lang, of age naman si Sandro when he went inside the hotel room bakit parang ang treatment sa kanya menor de edad na walang choice to say no on drugs offered to him and the advanced.
ReplyDeleteAsus tagal na silang ganyan. Wala ng kagulat gulat sa Inquirer
ReplyDeleteHindi na yata sila owned ng mga PRIETO kaya ganyan na low quality journalism na. And nag pass away na mom ni Tessa. Dati I would subscribe SUNDAY INQUIRER. My happy pill sarap magbasa noon.
ReplyDelete