Ambient Masthead tags

Saturday, November 2, 2024

Insta Scoop: Sandro Muhlach on Attorney Representing Alleged Perpetuators Dode Cruz and Jojo Nones and SH Victim Rita Daniela


Images courtesy of Instagram: sandromuhlach

47 comments:

  1. Alam mo Sandro, tumahimik ka na lng kaya, mahaba haba pang lalakarin ng kaso mo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. Kaya maraming nagdodoubt sa kanya eh. Sana justice will be served and not served only to those who have better influence. Kung totoo yung sinasabi nia, his father doesn't need to go to Senator friends.

      Nakakalimutan nia yata na accuser and accused both have rights.

      Delete
    2. Ikaw manahimik. May point siya.

      Delete
    3. walang nag dodoubt sa kanya, ikaw lang teh at ang PR team niyong bulok

      Delete
    4. 12:57 ikaw ang manahimik legally speaking may rights ang accused, what happened sa innocent until proven guilty?

      Delete
    5. 2:25 actually marami din

      Delete
    6. 1214 marami naman talagang tao na hindi nagiisip.

      Delete
    7. Isnt she the lawyer of Vhong?

      Delete
    8. Ang mga tao maskampi sa mga demonyo kesa sa taong naabuso.Mga wala ba kayong moral. Hindi dapat pinalalagpas ang may sala. Dapat makasuhan kawawa na ung mahihirap na hindi makuha ang justice.

      Delete
    9. Sa mga taong nang-aabuso sa ibang tao sana magkasakit sila ng malala dahil makasalanan sila.

      Delete
  2. The case of Sandro vs. Nones and Cruz is a completely different case from that of Rita Daniela. Lawyers are representing their clients whether they are the plaintiff or the defendant. I don’t understand why Sandro Muhlach is taking it out on the lawyer doing her job. Ibig ho bang sabihin dapat yung mga accused lang ang dapat kuning client ni lawyer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Blame it on his youth, bata pa siya kaya hindi niya alam yang mga bagay na yan na lawyers are simply doing their job.

      Delete
    2. Kaya eh, walang sense na common din. Una dakdak.

      Delete
    3. lawyers will defend any type of case

      Delete
    4. You know it makes sense cause you have moral obligation as a lawyer, you cant defend someone if ur not confident they are 100% telling the truth. I would understand if as a lawyer shes there to lighten the sentence but she is saying her clients are completely immocent. For real, dun plang sa text it doesnt seem na may magandang intention!

      Delete
    5. i think ang minimean niya is yung statement nung atty. nung sa PEP, then yung statement niya ngayon sa bago niyang case. taliwas kasi. dun sa una sabi niya walang basis yung mga sinabi ni sandro, so parang siya yung nagvictime blame, then ngayon sa case ni rita sabi niya wag magvictim blame hahaha

      Delete
  3. Actually, naisip ko nga na may isa pang SA case na hawak si madam, pero akala ko victim din ang other client ni Atty. Ang weird nga na tinanggap nya both cases pero she's on opposite sides.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It’s not weird. Lawyer sya, trabaho nila yan. May karapatan din naman ang mga accused kahit na maprove na guilty sila. In case di ka aware, it’s a lawyer’s job to ensure that yun rights nila ay naoobserve pa rin in accordance with the law. It’s not just about winning a case.

      Delete
    2. Yes 10:27. Minsan nga they’re just there to bargain the most appropriate deal for their clients.

      Delete
    3. 10:27 It's also all about the money, if I may add

      Delete
    4. Hindi weird yun isa ka pa! Lawyers yan teh!! I alamg personalan tang na loob.

      Delete
    5. Lawyers as any other professionals should always be objective.

      Delete
    6. truth be told, pera pera syempre. Lawyer yan. Wala naman siyang advocacy to side in just one particular case.

      Delete
  4. mahirap man sikmurain at times, everyone has rights, even those guilty of crimes. Trabaho nya yan as a lawyer, making sure na protected and enforced pa rin ang rights ng mga tao, whether ang client nya ay victim or suspect.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Akala niya porket lawyer ng kabila eh kalaban na din niya. Hindi niya naintindihan ang mga lawyers nga minsan kahit opposing counsels after hearings eh nagbibiruan pa din ang mga yan. It’s all just part of work.

      Delete
  5. I hope Sandro won't create a space so that the lawyer will be bashed and publicly humiliated. She was just doing her job and probably made the statement early on in the case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pero pangit naman din makita na doble kara ang lawyer.

      Delete
  6. I don’t think Sandro is in the right here and it goes to show how young and immature he still is. Trabaho naman yan talaga ng abogado to represent clients. It’s not personal. Saka both cases have nothing to do with each other so no conflict of interest there.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hayaan mo na yung lawyer Sandro. Trabaho nila yan at sinumpaan nila yan. Hindi sila pwede tumanggi kung may gusto magpatulong sa kanila. Trabaho yan. Kahit sabihin mukha silang pera lahat naman tayo kumakayod para jan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. concentrate na laang kayo sa mga matibay ninyong ebidensya at siguraduhin na magaling at de kampanilya ang lawyer ninyong lalaban dyan

      Delete
    2. 4:41 dapat mag concentrate din si Sandro since wala naman siyang malakas na ebidensya laban din dun sa dalawa.

      Delete
  8. So yong mga accused bawal ng mag abogado? Eh di ipakulong na direcho? Anong logic meron itong si Sandro?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bata, ang kalaban mo yung dalawa lang ha, wag mo personalin pati attorneys nila because they’re just doing their job. Konting 🧠 naman please.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Lawyer has the right to represent whether her client is the victim or suspect.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hay naku sandro. Attorneys are ALLOWED to represent whoever they want to as long as there's no conflict of interest within the case. Your case and rita's case are not related therefore she's allowed to represent both. Attorneys are not representing based on their opinion but based on FACTS. So just get your facts straight and prove them wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. she can yes. kaya sabi ni sandro, IRONIC, which is true. ironic talaga

      Delete
  12. Isipin mo nalang din Sandro, kahit ang mga kriminal, masasamang tao nililigtas at ginagamot pa din ng mga doktor. Kahit kaaway pa nila. Kasi tungkulin nila iligtas ang buhay ng tao.

    ReplyDelete
  13. May kaiba dito sa batang eto. Basta may off sa kanya.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wala atang nag gguide kay sandro. Parang paliguy ligoy sya sa mga posts kahit sa pagdalo nya sa senate hearing which is mali din.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dapat kung depressed sya hindi muna sya payagan muna mag social media.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Wag ka muna magsoc med baka mapagalitan ka pa ng judge kapag nag-iminanifest yang post mo sa court. You're attacking the professionalism of lawyers. Nasa Code of Professional Responsibility at Accountability nila yan to represent anyone accused man o complainant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope his lawyer advises him on that.

      Delete
    2. True. Sana may nagaadvise kay Sandro

      Delete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...