Tuesday, August 6, 2024

As Per Abogado PH, Lawyer of Richard Cruz and Jojo Nones Says Clients Will Seek Dismissal of Complaint of Sandro Muhlach

Image courtesy of Instagram: sandromuhlach


Images courtesy of Facebook: Abogado PH, www.abogado.com.ph
Full article: www.abogado.com.ph

79 comments:

  1. Classmates, sino ang nagsabi na Akala daw kasi pa-booking si Sandro?.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Source ni OD iirc

      Delete
    2. What a stupid excuse. Alam naman kung willing o hindi.

      Delete
    3. nakita ko nga na may ganyang publicity but this is not true

      Delete
  2. Ay eto na nga ang sinasabi kaya tahimik ang network. .may laban ang mga accla

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah! Unfortunately. Wala naman kaseng cctv sa loob ng kwarto which could be a solid proof. So pagalingan na lang talaga ng abogado yan.

      Delete
    2. šŸ™„šŸ™„šŸ™„

      Delete
    3. So it was Sandro who texted them first asking if they are still around and if he can drop by!

      Delete
    4. Sa hallway ng hotel may cctv siguro?

      Delete
    5. Trial by publicity din mga kampo ni accla eh kung matibay na ebidensya yan. Di nila yan ilalabas. Gusto din makakuha ng public sympathy

      Delete
    6. Di ba sinabi rin ni Sandro na akala niya ay may iba ring artista doon?

      Delete
    7. 9:18 That doesn't mean you can drug and violate somebody!

      Kahit nga asawa mo, hindi pwede gawin yun sayo!

      Delete
    8. Atty. Alma Mallonga ang lawyer ni V. Navarro

      Delete
    9. 8:48, kung lahat ng judge eh kagaya mo walang justice na makukuha lahat ng rape victims.

      Delete
  3. yung lawyer nila yan din lawyer ni Vhong Navarro.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kaya pala. Sad

      Delete
    2. Yikes. šŸš©

      Delete
    3. So mallonga yon diba?

      Delete
    4. Oh that’s why

      Delete
    5. At least kay Vhong may cctv. Alam natin physically impossible marape in less than 1 minute si Dennise. Itong bata kawawa kung totoo walang cctv na magpapatunay in his favor

      Delete
    6. 1041 - search Atty Maggie Abraham Garduque and Vhong Navarro especially his recent dismissal ng case, the answers are there. She is also TAPE’s lawyer.

      Delete
    7. Iba yan kay Mallonga. Si Mallonga talaga lawyer ni Vhong from the very beginning. Dinagdag lang yan lawyer na yan. Alam ko lawyer siya ng mga Jalosjos vs TVJ

      Delete
    8. Wrong.Alma Mallonga yung kay Vhong and 1035 and 1024 - why yikes and sad? - even the senior NBI and senior PNP doesn't believe Denice is rape - Cedric is a bully who does this to other guys like Buenavach and others. They set him up to extort him and for bully purposes. San ka nakakita ng narape na nag pa cute pa sa mirror ng elevator.

      Delete
    9. lawyer siya ni Vhong nung 2022 noong nakulong si Vhong. The articles are all over. Malongga and her are both his lawyers.

      Delete
    10. Ibang case naman ang Vhong and maganda dun ay nasecure ng kampo niya ang cctv na tugma sa statement ni vhong.

      Delete
    11. Hindi porket nagtext ay automatic na papayag sa ganun. Di ba pwedeng bumati and makipagbonding ng walang malisya. Baguhang artista kaya kelangan nila magpalapad ng papel but hindi naman siya naghihikahos sa buhay para gawin ang ganyan.

      Delete
    12. Iyong cctv na lumabas kay Vhong at Denise ay ibang araw na. Hindi dame day noong na-rape.

      Delete
    13. kung ako kay Nino kukunin ko si atty fortun

      Delete
  4. Ang issue is kung ano nangyari sa loob ng room. Ano ito? Episode ng lilet matias na gagamitin yung video na si Trixie ang humilo kay Inno pero totoo naman pala may kasalanan si Inno. Hayyy napanood ko na ito. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  5. Eh paano makaka gather ng evidence instead na ung organizer tumawag ng nbi para isecure ung ALLEGED crime scene gusto isettle internally. If the place was secured and Sandro's statement were to be believed (personally I believe him) that he was drugged sana nakita sa room or sa blood tests. For sure may mga fjnger prints din yan if nasa room sya. Baka ending pati cctv footage sa hallway ng hotel nawala or nabira na din. Pag ganyan kasi ung issue and allegations di pwede internally nakakaloka.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FYI. Ibang hotel yung pinagdausan ng GALA sa hotel nung dalawang accla

      Delete
  6. kahit na ba sya ang pumunta doon, di ibig sabihin na mag papa ano sya... kadiri

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It contradicts the fact kasi na ang sinasabi ni Sandro sya ang inaya.

      Delete
  7. There are 3 sides to every story, his side, their side and the truth!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh tapos? Gasgas na yan.

      Delete
    2. Wrong. Only two sides: Truth & Lies

      Delete
    3. 3,his,theirs,and the truth.

      Delete
    4. dalawa lang yan hindi tatlo, ang nagzasabi ng totoo at ang sinungaling.

      Delete
  8. CCTV ng hotel. Yung text na pinapunta siya. Maryano. Lawyer things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9:08 binasa mo ba yung statement nila? Si Sandro nga daw ang nag text at nagtanong kung nandoon pa sila and if could drop by.

      Delete
    2. According to the statement, Sandro was the one who asked if he could drop by the hotel where the 2 writers were staying

      Delete
    3. Jusko, mga accla maski asawa mo pa yan at you say no, it‘s a no pa rin. šŸ™„

      Delete
    4. Convo example: person 1- Asa hotel ka pa, daan ako dyan. person 2 - "ay oo dito pa, lika dali, daan ka"
      Sa point of view ni person 1, sya ni-invite, sa point of view ni person 2, si perso. 1 nag-initiate. But without the direct invitation of person 2, d dadaan si person 1. Ganun mga baks

      Delete
    5. Normal lang naman mag text ung tao niyaya mo sa lakad, kse making sure yung niyaya mo if tuloy ba or san kayo magkikita. Common sense.

      Delete
  9. There are always 2 sides of the story.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Naku! Baka may something sa mga exchange of messages ng mga beks at ni Sandro. Mas madaling manipulahin kapag black and white kesa your words against their words.

    ReplyDelete
  11. If he went there on his own volition, then why the need to spike his drink?

    And even if we assume that the drink wasn't spiked, if Sandro said "no" or "stop" at any point during that encounter, they should have stopped, otherwise that is r**e.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yun lang how to prove it

      Delete
    2. nabutas na ng defense yung "inaya" narrative nila, jan na papasok yung burden of proof IF may nangyari nga bang "assault", medical? witnesses? statement from the alleged gf? may mapprovide ba ang muhlach camp na credible proof?

      Delete
  12. still, no is no.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bakit sya pupunta sa room nyo e may room sya, kasama nya pa that time girlfriend nya ang sabi, at paano pa booking e anak mayaman yan hello?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Nagpa-medical kaya si Sandro right after? Kung may proof siya na nilagyan ng pampatulog yung drink niya, malaking ebidensya yun.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ang nabasa ko din sexual harassment ang kinaso hindi rape.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. meaning they don't have concrete evidence for rape

      Delete
    2. Hindi ba sexual assault, wherein rape is a type of sexual assault.

      Delete
    3. Rape under our law doesnt contemplate men, kasi required na sa v ang penetration. If the penetration happens anywhere else, Sexual assault na ang tawag. Penalty is lighter, because I think the law contemplates yung danger na mabuntis which can happen only if sa v ang penetration.

      Kaya ayun wala po talagang rape, legally speaking.

      Delete
    4. 3:05 False! RA 8353

      R*pe is commited by any person who commits an act of sexual assault by inserting his p*nis into another person’s mouth or an*l orifice, or any instrument or object, into the genital or oral orifice of another person.

      Delete
  16. Yung sinasabing text ni Sandro sa dalawa does not prove also na inosente sila. Puwedeng hindi pa rin niya ginusto yung mga naganap after. A lot of sexual abuse victims ay kilala nila ang suspect/s kasi nga tiwala sila tapos napagsamantalahan.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hindi ba nagpa medico legal yung Sandro? Dun kc malalaman kung may nangyari lalo na kung may penetration na naganap

    ReplyDelete
  18. whether he texted or not, kung sinabi niyang NO sa sexual advances, it’s still a NO.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paano makaka No the victim lost his free will

      Delete
    2. Dalawa yung perpetrators iisa lang ang victim

      Delete
  19. So his words against theirs? Mukhang labanan ng abogado ang mangyayare dito. Honestly, ito ang dahilan kung bakit di ako nag-law.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hoy mga accla, SA is SA. A no is a no!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sinabi naman niya akala niya may ibang mga actors dun. Hindi naman ibig sabihin na they have a free pass at abusing him.

    ReplyDelete
  22. pero why sabi ni Ogie nag usap na sila prior to statement being released and nag offer na Sina Accla na will donate sa chosen charity to compensate?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sa page ni OD ka magtanong girl

      Delete
    2. Hearsay lahat sinasabi ni ogie. Walang personal knowledge. Proof beyond reasonable doubt pa naman pag criminal case kaya mahihirapan talaga yan patunayan

      Delete
  23. I still believe sandro alangan trip trip lang e diba kilala pamilya nila tapos sabihin nya he was S A e that's serious ha

    ReplyDelete
  24. I wish right after nung nangyari ay nag report na agad sila sa Sandro sa pulis para may medico legal siya. Surely, traces of drugs will still be available sa system niya after it happened (if it is really true na may drugs involved) or a rape test kit will solidify their case.

    Still a no is no. Kesahodang siya pa nag-insist na magpunta sa hotel room nung mga accused. Kaya lang kapag ganyan, pagalingan talaga sila ng lawyer at evidences na p-present sa court.

    ReplyDelete
  25. To secure conviction in a criminal case, you don't rely on the weakness of the defense but on the evidence submitted by the prosecution proving a person's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

    ReplyDelete
  26. no, walang dismissal go tayo sa kaso

    ReplyDelete
  27. Consent is the key.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Seated for the plot twist.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Pwede naman Kasi may sinabihan sila na nagrelay Kay Sandro saka nagtext si Sandro. Chariz. Curious lang kasi parang habol ng dalawa is sexual harassment case lang not sexual assault..Parang timang lang din.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Ang tanong ko, anong aksyon ng network? Are these independent contractors still working for them? Hindi man lang ba suspended bilang may ongoing case? Hindi man lang ba banned muna sa network premises and events bilang proteksyon sa mga artista nila habang may ongoing case?

    ReplyDelete
  31. Lets wait til we see the complete convo sa side ni sandro. Hindi ba pwedeng early on pa sya niyaya at sinabi na madami sila dun kaya naman at a much much later part, nag chat si bagets na kung andon pa sila kasi dadaan sya?

    ReplyDelete