Nakagency raw yung driver. So kung may prob sa bayaran, it's between driver and agency. Kung hindi nagbigay ng tamang bayad yung bea's camp sa agency for the driver, eh di sana yung agency ang naghabol kay bea.
nope @2:43. lahat ng kumukuha sa agency ay may undertaking or solidary liability agreement na in case of non-payment of benefits, solidarily liable sila. kumbaga, hindi pede ma-agrabyado ang employee sa pagtuturuan ng agency and contractor kung sino ang magbabayd, bwak bwak bwak @ 2:43
Para sa mga ubod ng defensive diyan, solidary liability doesn't mean na may mali sa bea. It just means that the driver CAN go after bea for unpaid benefots EVEN IF nagbayad si bea sa agency. Bea can then sue the agency after. Huwag masyadong defensive agad. Hindi ibig sabihin ng solidary liability eh si bea na agad may kasalanan.
magbasa kayo ng Article 106 of Labor Code @12:24. isama mo na yung mga fans ni Ateng Bea na nasa agency. kaya marami naabuso sa labor kasi mga kulang kayo sa iodized salt.
1:37 ikaw yata ang need ng understanding dyan kasi hindi si Bea ang totoong boss ng driver na yan. Kapamilya ni Bea ang naghire sa driver n yan from the agency. So bakit kay Bea ang sisi nyo, aber?
5:22 huh? Academic discussion lang ito ante. Wala tayo sa NLRC. Hindi mga commenters dito ang magdedesisyon. Nilalatagan na nga kayo ng batas dahil ang dami niyong sinasabing mali mali.
walang denial na ganyan @5:22. sana derecho sinabi ng camp ni Bea na hindi siya ang nag hire diyan. sinabi lang na solidary liability eh sinisi na? lol
Sa tingin ko , may nagsusulsol sa driver at gf nito para IDIIN si BRA. Ihanda na lang nila ang pambayad nila sa abugado. Ubusan ng kaban ng pera!!!🥵🥵🥵
Saka di man lang ba nila naisip na sa status ng mga yan kokonsulta syempre sa abogado yan when it comes to matters like that, alangan naman basta na lang sila pumasok sa mga hiring na alam nilang makokompromiso sila
1:07 Kung gusto mong makaganti through character assassination, pamamahiya, at pagtsismisan ng sambayanan ang nirereklamo mo, idaan kay Tulfo. But if you want the proper and legal way, sa DOLE.
Kung mag hire kayo ng kasambahay. driver or P.A., pa pirmahin nyo ng contract with a clause na non disclosure agreement. Makasuhan nyo sila pag nag salita or chismis about their bosses.
Ako yung nagcomment sa unang article about this na hindi ako magtetake sides ng isang side pa lang ang narinig o nabasa ko dahil ilang beses na tayong napaso sa pagjajudge natin ng iaang side pa lang ang narinig o nabasa natin. See?
Ang pasweldo ba sa drivers at katulong per hour? What if mataas na ang binibigay mo compared sa standard rate. Ang aking work sa office salary based, pwede ako umuwi ng maaga basta tapos ang task ko for the day magpapaalam lang ako sa boss ko pinapayagan ako. Minsan naman kaialngan ko mag stay after office hours kasi hindi pa tapos ang ginagawa ko and wala akong overtime pay dahil salary based nga
gamon din nman sa atin, if salary base/salaried/monthly ka, hindi automatic na concount ang OT unless pre approved sha. pero di k pwede uwi ng maaga, ma undertime. Pero sa ibang bansa, pag salaried ka, pwede umuwi maaga or sa case namin, 6 hrs para pwede n hindi magfile ng undertime. pero pag hourly ka, hangga"t di ka nag clock out, bayad ka.
I always doubt that Bea will tarnish her name esp when it comes to income or pay . The nega camp will always find a way to destroy her, such a loser act to face a libel case..
Yung Agency talaga nagpapasweldo. Malaking cut nila kaya doon ka maghabol. Nakakatawa lang na binabalita pa ito na obvious na paninira. Paano ka magkaka 13 month pay at separation pay kung 3 months ka lang nagtrabaho. Pag nagbayad ka sa agency pwede kang magpalit ata ng 3 times kung hindi okay nakuha mo.
Regarding sa 13th month, any person who worked for at least 1 month ay entitled sa 13th month pay. However this will be prorated, each month is equal to 1/12 of his monthly salary.
1:24 She's been acting for 22 years, paanong ngayon lang? Kabibili lang nya ng bahay sa Spain. It's not an exaggeration, she is very well off for two decades na.
I was confident na sasagutin to ng camp ni bea and again thru the right process. At ito na nga. Ganyan dapat. Im always on Bea’s team. Kahit anong paninira nila no use dahil mahirap siraan ang taong genuinely mabuting tao.
Sana magupdate din si Bea sa masusugid niyang fans dito na nagtatanggol sa kanya. Kasi si Accla panay pa catch lang ng mga sagot, pero walang fan service.
Kaya maraming artista di pumapalag, tatahimik na lang kasi hassle. Either gagawan ka ng mga kwento or sisiraan or ilalabas ang baho kung meron man. Bea just proved na malinis sya para banggain ang mga bullies.
Walang panahong patulan ni BEA ang mga issue na ibinabato sa kanya. May mga magagaling syang abugado na keri nyang bayaran dahil may pera sya. Mas gugustuhin nyang kumita ng pera kesa mag-aksaya ng panahon sa mga INGGITERANG TSISMOSA.
Tsk, tsk, tsk, banggain mo ang pader? Isip, isip lang. Hmmm sino kaya backer nito para magkaroon ng ganitong guts? Gusto ko malaman sino lawyer nitong mga ito.
Go, go, go BEA!!! It’s about time na malaman nila and katotohanan. Sobra na ang character assination sa iyo. Kailangan din sampulan yan mga yan!!! Laban BEA!!!
Kaninog driver sya kung hindi kay Bea. If totoo na hindi naman pala driver ni Bea grabe ang paninira ng jowa ng driver kay Bea hindi naman pala niya talagang amo si Bea
Kaya lang nung nag file na si Bea ng kaso laban kay Cristy and jowa ng driver dun nalang siya nag file ng ganito. Ang sabi ng lawyers na unrealistic demands kasi sa pagkakalam ko driver yan ng kapatid ni Bea. Yung pamangkin ni Bea ang pinagdrive ng driver kaya night shift and ot medyo malabo dahil school and mall lang siguro ang pinupuntahan ng sister in law and the kids pero we'll see once may hearing na
Contractual employees are entitled to holiday pay and service incentive leaves if their employment has lasted for at least one month. Thirteenth-Month Pay: They are also entitled to a thirteenth-month pay if they have worked for at least one month within a calendar year. CONTRACTUAL EMPLOYEES ARE LIKEWISE ENTITLED TO VACATION AND SICK LEAVE CREDITS AS WELL AS SPECIAL LEAVE PRIVILEGES
Di sakop ang family driver at yung mga claims nia gaya ng night differential, holiday pay, etc sa reklamo sa NLRC. Parang house helper yan, di sakop sa Labor Code. Fix rate sila atsaka di sila full hours ang work load nila pag magpapadrive lang.
1:16 not B's responsibility. The driver was supplied by a driving agency. Payment for the contract was secured by the agency. So bayad sila B sa agency. Payment of the driver, all the driver's benefits, etc. Are the responsibility of the employer which is the driving agency. Client ng driving agency si Bea. Bea is not the driver's employer.
Napilitan lang ang driver kasi kailangan ng counter affidavit ang girlfriend. Imbis na makahanap ng bagong trabaho ang driver baka mahirapan pa. Sa legal na paraan idaan ang complaints kasi lumalabas na sinisiraan nila talaga ang dating amo pag nagkalat sa ig pero hindi nag file ng complaint sa DOLE nung una palang
They can't bring Bea down, she's so smart she stayed 20 plus years in showbiz as indemand talent and from poverty to being a billionaire. I think someone or two ang may pakana. Laban Bea.
We got our company driver supplied through an agency. May rotation sila kasi 3 drivers sa company namin for our CEO then on call sa staff yung dalawa. We pay directly sa company kasi sila ang supplier ng drivers. The company pays them directly. The CEO's driver na assigned sa amin for the duration of the contract na, yung dalawa naman, rotate kung sino assigned ny driver agency kada week. Our company paid the agency in advance for the 2 year contract. Ang bayad ng driver sa agency na niya galing. Therefore, lahat ng benefits, pay and employment conditions ay responsibility ng agency not our company.
In the same way, the 3-month driver ni B ay sole responsibility ng driving agency, not B or her camp. Bayad sila sa agency, bakit babayad ulit si B sa driver eh ang kontrata ni driver ay sa agency? Anong kalokohan to?
2:33 Bea can implead the agency if matuloy na makasuhan siya or she can sue the agency for reimbursement after paying. Solidary liability just means the employee can go after either or both of them but the solidary debtors can settle still among themselves.
BUT I don't believe na entitled pa sa benefits na hinihingi yung driver unless may contract talaga. Walang overtime pay at night shift differential ang drivers under the law.
3:46 the contract is between the driver and the agency, not bea and the driver so Bea is not involved in any contract with the driver. Besides, its not the driver that sued, it's his gf. Does this make sense? Nuisance lang, wasting resources lang. Parang to slander lang ang purpose.
magbasa kayo ng Article 106 of the Labor Code @2:33. may solidary liability diyan. pede maghahol ang driver na nk-agency sa agency and sa nag-hire in case of non-payment of wages. hindi problema ng driver kung sino sa kanila ang magbayad.
I'm not defending the driver. Sabi ko nga afaik hindi siya entitled sa benefits. And definitely the GF has no standing to file a case in behalf of the driver.
I'm just commenting on the nature of solidary liability under the labor laws. Contrary to what most commenters here think, hindi siya unfair. It's for the employee's protection kasi, precisely because he is not privy to the dealings between the principal employer and the agency. Malay ba ng employee kung nagbayad na si bea or not, hindi niya yun malalaman dahil hindi nga siya ang ka-deal ni bea. You said it yourself that bea is dealing with the agency. That's why the labor law imposes solidary liability on the agency and the principal employer. And then the principal employer (bea) can sue the agency. Solidary debtors can sue each other. Walang problema dyan. May recourse pa rin ang employer kung manloloko ang agency. But first, the law protects the employee. That's the law.
Procedurally, it would be correct for the driver (NOT THE GF) to file a case against either or both bea and the agency. But as to the merits of the case, ibang usapan na yun.
7:01 solidary argument aside, the case has no foundation. It is akin to filibustering. The contract is between the driver and the agency. B's camp is a client of the agency, the agency being a service provider. The driver is the employee of the agency , an instrument to the agency's provision of that service. In fact, because of the behavior of the driver and his instigating GF, this is more akin to harassment. Why involve B? The client in the first place is her brother, not her.
Sabi ng pinsan kong lawyer walang overtime and night differential pay ang family driver. Nabasa ko rin sa labor law na wala nga dahil company drivers lang ang meron.
The gf made the case, not even the driver. Its nothing but nuisance. He should have sued his agency, only he, the driver could, not his GF. The contract is between him and his agency.
Iba ang driver ni Bea. Itong nagrereklamo, family driver ng maiksing panahon lang sa kapatid ata ni bea, hindi kay bea mismo nag serve. Pero si Bea ngayon ang tinitira kasi sya nga naman ang sikat. Paninira na talaga itong ginagawa nila.
Naks daming lawyer sa comment section hahahahaha. Puro “ang alam ko”… “dapat gannito”…. Magsitigil mga feeling Atty. if may reklamo na, then it’s a battle between their counsel ðŸ¤
Nakagency raw yung driver. So kung may prob sa bayaran, it's between driver and agency. Kung hindi nagbigay ng tamang bayad yung bea's camp sa agency for the driver, eh di sana yung agency ang naghabol kay bea.
ReplyDeleteKorek!!!
DeleteMay classes din sana ang mga kasambahay tungkol sa professionalism na turuan sila na pag may problema alam nila kung saan or kanino mag susumbong.
Deletenope. in case of non-payment of benefits, bea and the agency are solidarily liable sa driver.
Deletetumfact! yung bwak bwak bwak bwak kasi kulang kulang ang chismis sana talaga maximum amount ang ipataw sa libel case nya.
Delete1:37 That's not how employment agency works. His employment agreement including salary and benefit, is only between him and the agency, not Bea.
DeleteHindi naman siguro tanga yan sina bea para hindi magbayad ng tama sa staff nila.
Delete1:37 NOPE. IT'S ONLY BETWEEN THE DRIVER AND HIS AGENCY.
Deletenope @2:43. lahat ng kumukuha sa agency ay may undertaking or solidary liability agreement na in case of non-payment of benefits, solidarily liable sila. kumbaga, hindi pede ma-agrabyado ang employee sa pagtuturuan ng agency and contractor kung sino ang magbabayd, bwak bwak bwak @ 2:43
DeleteTrue😆
Delete1.37 liable si B kung hindi sya nag bayad s Agency. If ever settle nmn lahat it is bet her and Agency so Agency ung may pananagutan dyan.
Delete1:37 hindi ah! unless labor only contracting ang agency
Deletewith Bea, driver can be outsourced dahil sa nature of business nya
Mukhang madadagdagan na naman ang kaso ni Cristy Fermin. sana nga maparusahan na itong chismosang talakera.
Deletethis is obviously a shake down. trying to extort her coz they know she has money
DeleteKaya nga may agency para walang sakit sa ulo yung employer ..doon ka sa agency naka pirma ng contract .
DeleteAlam ko kasi nag agency ako
1:37 Luuuhhhh hahaha
DeletePara sa mga ubod ng defensive diyan, solidary liability doesn't mean na may mali sa bea. It just means that the driver CAN go after bea for unpaid benefots EVEN IF nagbayad si bea sa agency. Bea can then sue the agency after. Huwag masyadong defensive agad. Hindi ibig sabihin ng solidary liability eh si bea na agad may kasalanan.
Delete3:48/1:37 huuuuhhhhh???
DeleteTeh, pano yan??! Dba dapat ang AGENCY ang liable sa lahat?!
magbasa kayo ng Article 106 of Labor Code @12:24. isama mo na yung mga fans ni Ateng Bea na nasa agency. kaya marami naabuso sa labor kasi mga kulang kayo sa iodized salt.
Delete1:37 ikaw yata ang need ng understanding dyan kasi hindi si Bea ang totoong boss ng driver na yan. Kapamilya ni Bea ang naghire sa driver n yan from the agency. So bakit kay Bea ang sisi nyo, aber?
Delete5:22 huh? Academic discussion lang ito ante. Wala tayo sa NLRC. Hindi mga commenters dito ang magdedesisyon. Nilalatagan na nga kayo ng batas dahil ang dami niyong sinasabing mali mali.
Deletewalang denial na ganyan @5:22. sana derecho sinabi ng camp ni Bea na hindi siya ang nag hire diyan. sinabi lang na solidary liability eh sinisi na? lol
DeleteExciting. Laban Queen B
ReplyDeleteScary! Atras na CRISTY!!!😱
DeleteSa tingin ko , may nagsusulsol sa driver at gf nito para IDIIN si BRA. Ihanda na lang nila ang pambayad nila sa abugado. Ubusan ng kaban ng pera!!!🥵🥵🥵
Delete“BRA” - BEA RANOLLO ALONZO, tama ba’ko?🙄
DeleteTatlong buwang nagtrabaho sa pamilya. Hindi pa mismo kay Bea. Tapos puro bangga pa at tsismis kay Bea. Bakit ka nga naman ireretain pa
ReplyDeleteyung gf ang madakdak e. ni hindi nga sya ung nagtrabaho kay bea
DeleteSaka di man lang ba nila naisip na sa status ng mga yan kokonsulta syempre sa abogado yan when it comes to matters like that, alangan naman basta na lang sila pumasok sa mga hiring na alam nilang makokompromiso sila
DeleteAng masama yung pag chichismisan ang naging amo. Pag may reklamo kay Tulfo or sa DOLE dapat lumapit.
ReplyDeleteLOL Hindi po government agency or legal office ang Tulfo.
Delete1:07 Kung gusto mong makaganti through character assassination, pamamahiya, at pagtsismisan ng sambayanan ang nirereklamo mo, idaan kay Tulfo. But if you want the proper and legal way, sa DOLE.
Delete1.07 ayan laging kay Tulfo ang puntahan kapag may reklamo. Alam mo bang public shaming ang ginagawa nila at pede silang ireklamo.
DeleteBak hinde yn tinanggp ni Tulfo
Delete1:07 1st venue si tulfo? only in the philippines!
DeleteKung mag hire kayo ng kasambahay. driver or P.A., pa pirmahin nyo ng contract with a clause na non disclosure agreement. Makasuhan nyo sila pag nag salita or chismis about their bosses.
Delete120 from what i know, all the contract ay may non disclosure agreement n.
DeleteDaming tameme ngayon
ReplyDeleteAko yung nagcomment sa unang article about this na hindi ako magtetake sides ng isang side pa lang ang narinig o nabasa ko dahil ilang beses na tayong napaso sa pagjajudge natin ng iaang side pa lang ang narinig o nabasa natin. See?
Delete12:04 I'm so proud of you!
DeleteAng pasweldo ba sa drivers at katulong per hour? What if mataas na ang binibigay mo compared sa standard rate. Ang aking work sa office salary based, pwede ako umuwi ng maaga basta tapos ang task ko for the day magpapaalam lang ako sa boss ko pinapayagan ako. Minsan naman kaialngan ko mag stay after office hours kasi hindi pa tapos ang ginagawa ko and wala akong overtime pay dahil salary based nga
ReplyDeleteBasta hindi lumampas ng 40 hours yata hindi entitled sa overtime pay.
Deletegamon din nman sa atin, if salary base/salaried/monthly ka, hindi automatic na concount ang OT unless pre approved sha. pero di k pwede uwi ng maaga, ma undertime. Pero sa ibang bansa, pag salaried ka, pwede umuwi maaga or sa case namin, 6 hrs para pwede n hindi magfile ng undertime.
Deletepero pag hourly ka, hangga"t di ka nag clock out, bayad ka.
monthly ang usually na sweldo ng drivers/kasambahay
DeleteI always doubt that Bea will tarnish her name esp when it comes to income or pay . The nega camp will always find a way to destroy her, such a loser act to face a libel case..
ReplyDeletedi talaga kapanı paniwala,sa mga tauhan nila sa farm e pinagawan nya ng magagandang bahay bawat pamilya ng staff nya
DeleteSa agency ng driver sya magreklamo! Kasi sa agency naman nagbabayad si bea. Ang agency may lapses dito hindi si bea.
ReplyDeleteang problema pa dito e yung gf ng driver ang nagcocomplain, hindi si driver
Delete@846 hiwalayan na ng driver na yan yang girlfriend nyang ginawan lang sya ng gulo sa buhay.
DeleteNasaan na kaya yung nagsabi sa mas naunang article na kampi siya kay Cristy Fermin?
ReplyDeleteNagtatago hhehe
DeleteTameme
DeleteIllegal dismissal talaga? Ano gusto nya, di sya pwedeng sisantihin pagkatapos nyang ibangga ng paulit ulit yung sasakyan?
ReplyDeleteYung galit na galit jowa kay B. Eh karapatan naman ng kahiy sinong employee mag alis lalo if di sila satisfied. Tapos puro issue pa.
ReplyDeleteThey just proved Bea made right decision na sisantihin sya dahil ganyan attitude ng driver.
Delete*employer
Deletetapos ichichismis pa,dapat mag demanda din si Bea sa driver
ReplyDeleteang lakas ng loob mag demanda e 3months pa lang pala sa serbisyo
ReplyDeleteYung Agency talaga nagpapasweldo. Malaking cut nila kaya doon ka maghabol. Nakakatawa lang na binabalita pa ito na obvious na paninira. Paano ka magkaka 13 month pay at separation pay kung 3 months ka lang nagtrabaho. Pag nagbayad ka sa agency pwede kang magpalit ata ng 3 times kung hindi okay nakuha mo.
ReplyDeleteRegarding sa 13th month, any person who worked for at least 1 month ay entitled sa 13th month pay. However this will be prorated, each month is equal to 1/12 of his monthly salary.
DeleteDapat sa driver at jowa, iexpose ang mga pagmumuka para yung mga future papasukan nila wag na silang tanggapin
ReplyDeleteSee? Matalino si Bea hindi yan gagawa ng ikakasira ng image na matagal nyang inalagaan.
ReplyDeleteIf money matters ang ibabato ni Cristy na issue about Bea matatalo lang siya hehe
ReplyDeleteSi Bea pa talaga na bilyonarya no? Hahaha
Delete10:35, Don't exaggerate. Ngayon na lang nagka pera si Bea, She was also poor before she joined showbiz. Nag inarte na lang ngayon.
Delete1:24, matagal na sa showbiz si Bea kaya matagal na siyang bilyonarya. Ang dami niyang investments.
DeletePinaghirapan naman nia kung ano meron sya at nakapagpundar ng mga negosyo. Wala syang inaapakan.
Delete1:24 what is even your point? Ang importante ubod sya ng yaman ngayon tapos! Upo sa sulok!
Delete1:24 She's been acting for 22 years, paanong ngayon lang? Kabibili lang nya ng bahay sa Spain. It's not an exaggeration, she is very well off for two decades na.
Deleteang point eh hindi naman old rich yang idol nyo @3:02 and 2:44. pero kayong mga fans, akala nyo eh laking forbes park yang idol nyo, lol
Delete5:31 Irrelevant ka ateng. Stop commenting mas lalo kang nagmumukhang T.
Delete5:31, does it matter kung old rich or new rich? Anf importante ay rich na siya.
Delete5:31, mas maganda naman ang dating mahirap na mayaman na ngayon, kesa sa dating mahirap na hanggang ngayon ay mahirap pa rin.
DeleteKung hindi totoo yung claims ng driver better na bawiin nalang niya at magsabi ng totoo. Baka siya pa kasuhan ni Bea, lalong kawawa siya.
ReplyDeleteI was confident na sasagutin to ng camp ni bea and again thru the right process. At ito na nga. Ganyan dapat. Im always on Bea’s team. Kahit anong paninira nila no use dahil mahirap siraan ang taong genuinely mabuting tao.
ReplyDeleteTakot lang mga yan dahil matatalo sila sa kaso na sinampa sa kanila ni bea lols
ReplyDeleteSana magupdate din si Bea sa masusugid niyang fans dito na nagtatanggol sa kanya. Kasi si Accla panay pa catch lang ng mga sagot, pero walang fan service.
ReplyDeleteHindi sa ganung paraan ng fan service ang ginagawa nya. Ang cheap lang.
DeleteLegal matters is not something that she should be freely talking about.
DeleteBeh, any legal battle ay hindi pangfan service!!! Kaloka
DeleteMabait na tao si BEA. Madali syang lapitan at maawain sa mga kapuspalad. Nakakapagtaka lang kung bakit may mga taong gusto syang husgahan. 😔😔
ReplyDeleteKaya maraming artista di pumapalag, tatahimik na lang kasi hassle. Either gagawan ka ng mga kwento or sisiraan or ilalabas ang baho kung meron man. Bea just proved na malinis sya para banggain ang mga bullies.
DeleteWalang panahong patulan ni BEA ang mga issue na ibinabato sa kanya. May mga magagaling syang abugado na keri nyang bayaran dahil may pera sya. Mas gugustuhin nyang kumita ng pera kesa mag-aksaya ng panahon sa mga INGGITERANG TSISMOSA.
DeletePahiya mga mabilis manghusga. Go bea!!
ReplyDeleteTsk, tsk, tsk, banggain mo ang pader? Isip, isip lang. Hmmm sino kaya backer nito para magkaroon ng ganitong guts? Gusto ko malaman sino lawyer nitong mga ito.
ReplyDeletesa mga tauhan na nga lang nila sa farm pinagawaan nila ng bahay mga staff kasi Kasama pamilya dun
ReplyDeleteGo, go, go BEA!!! It’s about time na malaman nila and katotohanan. Sobra na ang character assination sa iyo. Kailangan din sampulan yan mga yan!!! Laban BEA!!!
ReplyDeleteKaninog driver sya kung hindi kay Bea. If totoo na hindi naman pala driver ni Bea grabe ang paninira ng jowa ng driver kay Bea hindi naman pala niya talagang amo si Bea
ReplyDeleteSa kids hatid sa montessori school en mall kaya walang night differential en OT sya
Deletemeron syang agenda sa madaling salita, nademanda kc nobya nya
if true ang sinabi ng driver....kahit 3 mos pa lang siya he has the right to have just compesation---OT & night differential...etc
ReplyDeleteKaya lang nung nag file na si Bea ng kaso laban kay Cristy and jowa ng driver dun nalang siya nag file ng ganito. Ang sabi ng lawyers na unrealistic demands kasi sa pagkakalam ko driver yan ng kapatid ni Bea. Yung pamangkin ni Bea ang pinagdrive ng driver kaya night shift and ot medyo malabo dahil school and mall lang siguro ang pinupuntahan ng sister in law and the kids pero we'll see once may hearing na
DeleteNot true nga daw according to Bea's attorney
Delete12:02 kung totoo na pamangkin ang main passengers ng driver dapat lang tangalin. Buhay ng pamangkin ni Bea ang at risk pag nababanga ang kotse.
DeleteContractual employees are entitled to holiday pay and service incentive leaves if their employment has lasted for at least one month. Thirteenth-Month Pay: They are also entitled to a thirteenth-month pay if they have worked for at least one month within a calendar year.
DeleteCONTRACTUAL EMPLOYEES ARE LIKEWISE ENTITLED TO VACATION AND SICK LEAVE CREDITS AS WELL AS SPECIAL LEAVE PRIVILEGES
CONTRACTUAL EMPLOYEES ARE LIKEWISE ENTITLED TO VACATION AND SICK LEAVE CREDITS AS WELL AS SPECIAL LEAVE PRIVILEGES
DeleteAll contractual employees are entitled to receive a 13th-month pay equivalent to one-twelfth of their basic salary.
Di sakop ang family driver at yung mga claims nia gaya ng night differential, holiday pay, etc sa reklamo sa NLRC. Parang house helper yan, di sakop sa Labor Code. Fix rate sila atsaka di sila full hours ang work load nila pag magpapadrive lang.
Delete1:16 not B's responsibility. The driver was supplied by a driving agency. Payment for the contract was secured by the agency. So bayad sila B sa agency. Payment of the driver, all the driver's benefits, etc. Are the responsibility of the employer which is the driving agency. Client ng driving agency si Bea. Bea is not the driver's employer.
DeleteNapilitan lang ang driver kasi kailangan ng counter affidavit ang girlfriend. Imbis na makahanap ng bagong trabaho ang driver baka mahirapan pa. Sa legal na paraan idaan ang complaints kasi lumalabas na sinisiraan nila talaga ang dating amo pag nagkalat sa ig pero hindi nag file ng complaint sa DOLE nung una palang
ReplyDeleteThey can't bring Bea down, she's so smart she stayed 20 plus years in showbiz as indemand talent and from poverty to being a billionaire. I think someone or two ang may pakana. Laban Bea.
ReplyDeleteWhy, of all the drivers working for celebrities, only Bea’s had this complaint?! This is how people weigh in on the situation.
ReplyDeleteWe got our company driver supplied through an agency. May rotation sila kasi 3 drivers sa company namin for our CEO then on call sa staff yung dalawa. We pay directly sa company kasi sila ang supplier ng drivers. The company pays them directly. The CEO's driver na assigned sa amin for the duration of the contract na, yung dalawa naman, rotate kung sino assigned ny driver agency kada week. Our company paid the agency in advance for the 2 year contract. Ang bayad ng driver sa agency na niya galing. Therefore, lahat ng benefits, pay and employment conditions ay responsibility ng agency not our company.
ReplyDeleteIn the same way, the 3-month driver ni B ay sole responsibility ng driving agency, not B or her camp. Bayad sila sa agency, bakit babayad ulit si B sa driver eh ang kontrata ni driver ay sa agency? Anong kalokohan to?
2:33 Bea can implead the agency if matuloy na makasuhan siya or she can sue the agency for reimbursement after paying. Solidary liability just means the employee can go after either or both of them but the solidary debtors can settle still among themselves.
DeleteBUT I don't believe na entitled pa sa benefits na hinihingi yung driver unless may contract talaga. Walang overtime pay at night shift differential ang drivers under the law.
3:46 the contract is between the driver and the agency, not bea and the driver so Bea is not involved in any contract with the driver. Besides, its not the driver that sued, it's his gf. Does this make sense? Nuisance lang, wasting resources lang. Parang to slander lang ang purpose.
Deletemagbasa kayo ng Article 106 of the Labor Code @2:33. may solidary liability diyan. pede maghahol ang driver na nk-agency sa agency and sa nag-hire in case of non-payment of wages. hindi problema ng driver kung sino sa kanila ang magbayad.
DeleteI'm not defending the driver. Sabi ko nga afaik hindi siya entitled sa benefits. And definitely the GF has no standing to file a case in behalf of the driver.
DeleteI'm just commenting on the nature of solidary liability under the labor laws. Contrary to what most commenters here think, hindi siya unfair. It's for the employee's protection kasi, precisely because he is not privy to the dealings between the principal employer and the agency. Malay ba ng employee kung nagbayad na si bea or not, hindi niya yun malalaman dahil hindi nga siya ang ka-deal ni bea. You said it yourself that bea is dealing with the agency. That's why the labor law imposes solidary liability on the agency and the principal employer. And then the principal employer (bea) can sue the agency. Solidary debtors can sue each other. Walang problema dyan. May recourse pa rin ang employer kung manloloko ang agency. But first, the law protects the employee. That's the law.
Procedurally, it would be correct for the driver (NOT THE GF) to file a case against either or both bea and the agency. But as to the merits of the case, ibang usapan na yun.
7:01 solidary argument aside, the case has no foundation. It is akin to filibustering. The contract is between the driver and the agency. B's camp is a client of the agency, the agency being a service provider. The driver is the employee of the agency , an instrument to the agency's provision of that service. In fact, because of the behavior of the driver and his instigating GF, this is more akin to harassment. Why involve B? The client in the first place is her brother, not her.
Delete@ 1:24 so pag poor then umasenso
ReplyDeletePapayag ng tapak-tapakan ganun ba?
Mga kasama pala sa bahay at close na close pala ung mga utaw dito kay Bea alam na alam nila ang ugali
ReplyDeleteMay lawyer ang driver for sure may guide yan sya. Hindi itutuloy yan kung walang laban.
ReplyDeleteSabi ng pinsan kong lawyer walang overtime and night differential pay ang family driver. Nabasa ko rin sa labor law na wala nga dahil company drivers lang ang meron.
DeleteThe gf made the case, not even the driver. Its nothing but nuisance. He should have sued his agency, only he, the driver could, not his GF. The contract is between him and his agency.
DeleteHindi makakapagfile sa NLRC ang driver kung hindi valid. Sa labor case kasi ang burden of proof ay nasa employer wala sa employee.
ReplyDeleteAng alam ko company drivers ang meron night differential pay dahil sila ang may night shift. Pag family driver iba ang labor law
ReplyDeleteIba ang driver ni Bea. Itong nagrereklamo, family driver ng maiksing panahon lang sa kapatid ata ni bea, hindi kay bea mismo nag serve. Pero si Bea ngayon ang tinitira kasi sya nga naman ang sikat. Paninira na talaga itong ginagawa nila.
ReplyDeleteNaks daming lawyer sa comment section hahahahaha.
ReplyDeletePuro “ang alam ko”… “dapat gannito”…. Magsitigil mga feeling Atty. if may reklamo na, then it’s a battle between their counsel ðŸ¤
Open forum ito teh walang nag sasabi na courthouse to pero open for discussion dito.
DeleteThe nature of an open forum is so that people weigh in on things, just like you...11:34
DeleteDi kasi nila matanggap na may kaso nanaman idol nila
DeleteAng dami nasasangkutan na eskandalo pag binalita sila yung magagaling.
Mahina rin tong lawyer ni Bea noh
ReplyDeleteBakit d nyo ilabas mga resibo nyo