Ambient Masthead tags

Sunday, January 21, 2024

TAPE Inc. Files for TRO on Court Decision's Use of 'Eat Bulaga' Trademark

Image courtesy of Facebook: TAPE INC.

Image courtesy of X: gmanews

 

96 comments:

  1. Jusko. Hirap ba mag-isip ng title nakakagatin ng masa kaya g na g sa "Eat Bulaga"? 🤦‍♀️

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Makapang asar lang talaga ang mga JALOSJOS noh?

      BWHAHAHAAH.

      EAT BULAGA IS TVJ.

      Delete
    2. Ang haba naman kasi ng title nila, akala mo tongue twister!

      Yung ibabayad nila ng abogado, ibayad na lang nila ng creative team to think of a new title, sows!!!

      Delete
    3. Jusko ayaw talagang tumigil mga

      Delete
  2. Jusko move on na po. May Tahanang Pinakamasaya na nga kayo di ba? Naku bakit habol pa rin kayo ng habol sa Eat Bulaga? Sa GMA execs tanggalin niyo na nga sana ito sa station niyo. O mas better ipalit sila sa IS sa GTV at ang It's Showtime ang ilagay sa GMA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CH7 ang may pinakamalawak na reach sa free tv compared to TV5 at GTV pero sila pinaka-kulelat sa ratings sa noontime slot meaning people were still watching them dati dahil EAT BULAGA ang title ng show nila kaya ayan pakapalan na ng fez at mukang balak ng TAPE iexhaust lahat ng legal possible way to get the title back.

      Delete
    2. Hindi sila masaya sa Tahanang Pinakamasaya. Eat Bulaga lang daw ang magpapasaya sa kanila hahaha

      Delete
  3. it's a bad precedence to showbiz industry ang ginawang decision ng marikina rtc kasi parang sinasabi nila na ang mga empleyado ng show na nakaisip ng title at segments eh pwede na nila ipa trademark for them kahit di naman sila ang producer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is it! Naging precedent na nga at iyan siyempre amg gustong iwasan ng mga producers at employers.

      Delete
    2. Di rin sila ang nag create ng show

      Delete
    3. May point ka baka some employee are thinking about doing that

      Delete
    4. Wrong, TAPE was not even a company in 1979 when Eat Bulaga was created. Learn the facts first before trying to be smart on discussing precedence.

      Delete
    5. TVJ aren’t employees of TAPE. Besides, when Eat Bulaga was created, wala pang TAPE.

      Delete
    6. I think sa copyright -- yung nag invent ng name and may legally rights.

      Delete
    7. They're not employees though. They're classified as talents, more like independent contractors. So whatever TVJ created, it's theirs. It's not a bad precedent at all. In fact it is a good lesson to everyone involved to seek the law to protect their rights.

      Delete
    8. It’s no difference between the story of Sarah G and Gforce. Gforce was paid to create dance steps for some of Sarah’s hit songs. But when Sarah and Georcelle had creative differences the latter demanded na hindi pwedeng gamitin ang mga choreography na ginawa niya for Sarah dahil she owns the copyrights. Georcelle was paid to begin with to make those dance steps, pero in the end siya pa rin ang may ari ng copyright.

      Delete
    9. I am not sure if this is applicable dito. Pero independent writer contractor ako sa isang radio program. May kasamahan ako nun na independent writer din na lumipat sa kalabang estasyon. Tapos lahat ng sinulat niya sa radio program namin, ginamit niya rin sa kalabang estasyon.

      Hindi naman siya kinasuhan ng radio station namin kasi sabi ng boss namin walang nilabag na batas ung kasamahan ko dahil at the end of the day, kasamahan ko nagsulat ng gawa at hindi copyrighted ng radio station ung gawa niya. Binayaran lang to use the work, but not the copyright.

      Delete
    10. Intellectual Property Rights

      Delete
    11. **** I think sa copyright -- yung nag invent ng name ang may legal rights.

      Delete
    12. Thank you 1205!

      Delete
    13. It's a battle between trademark and copyright and for what it's worth, until buhay pa ang authors, the copyright is theirs.

      Delete
    14. Si Jalosjoa rin ang may-ari ng Production Specialist, na naging TAPE later on.

      Delete
    15. 10:58 Yang pinagmamalaki niyong trademark is for merchandising. Joey De Leon ang nag-register ng trademark ng for entertainment. Puwede niyong gamitin yang Eat Bulaga kung papanivan kayo ng korte as products but not as a show. Talo pa din kayo.

      Delete
    16. Even that trademark registry will have to eventually be returned to TVJ because it clashes with established ownership of the creative concept unless a settlement occurs.

      Delete
    17. This I agree. Aminin man ng TVJ o hindi, nagkaproblema sila nung gusto nang magtakeover mga jalosjos wc they have a right as owners.

      Delete
    18. 3:20 whether or not may problema ang talents vs producers, ang question ay creative ownership. It belongs to TVJ before TAPE even became their producer. Ang EB associated na yan sa kanila, sa TVJ, 4 na dekada na mahigit, hindi lang sa public knowledge, sa creative ownership rin. Ibebase ang decision ng korte sa opinion ng IPOPHIL dahil IPO ang labanan diyan. Nasa batas ng RA8293 ng Pinas ang protection of exclusive rights ng artists, scientists, inventors and gifted citizens sa kanilang creations. Creator - ang naglikha. So, sino ang naglikha ng name at kondept na EB bago pa man ang TAPE? Ang Sagot si Joey de Leon at ang TVJ. That's all that's needed, no more points of argument.

      Delete
  4. baka nakalimutan nyo po, ang mga jalosjos ang producer ng eat bulaga. ang tvj at si jenny ferre noon eh mga paid hosts/employees lang ng tape. bayad po ng tape inc si joey de leon sa pag create nya ng title na eat bulaga noon by the senior jalosjos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wala pang TAPE when EB was created.

      Delete
    2. Mukhang hinde mo alam na kaya nanalo ang tvj dahil nacreate ni joey ang eat bulaga 1979 pa at ang tape eh 1981 na sumulpot

      Delete
    3. Correction @11:01 Eat Bulaga started on 1979, Tape became the producer somewhere in 1981. So paanong bayad ng TAPE si Joey sa pag create ng title ?

      Delete
    4. yung may opinion ka kahit wala kang alam

      Delete
    5. In addition, hindi lang si jalosjos sr. ang owner nung unang producers ng Eat Bulaga. So, kung valid yang sinasabi mo 11:01 - kahit hindi naman talaga, hindi pa din puwedeng gamitin yan ng mga jalosjos kung hindi alam ng co-producer ng Sr.

      Delete
    6. 11:01 baka nalimutan mo rin that JDL invented, nakaisip, lumikha ng eat bulaga 1979 yun. Pano mababayaran yun ng senior jalosjos eh wala pa sya sa eksena nung 1979?

      Delete
    7. Itong mga ito Ng tatalino..banago Lang Naman nila ang production outfit nila maging TAPE Inc. So maituturing na TAPEYan...besides TAPE utilize Eat bulaga and legally registered it...Haller kaya may TRO appeal.

      Delete
    8. 11:47 it is a question of creative ownership over the concept. They already have EB in 1979 bago pa man dumating ang TAPE na early 80's. Therefore, if TAPE leaves as a producer, they cannot take EB and the creative ownership of the concept. As investors, they do not have ownership of the trademark. Its so simple. Ang konsepto at pangalan kay Joey at TVJ, ang capital sa TAPE. Now that TAPE has left, then, they do not have access to the creative concept anymore.

      Delete
    9. 11:47 ikaw yung inexplain na ng teacher ang formula, pero di mo parin gets bakit ganyan ang result ng equation. Ikaw yung tinanong ng history question at binigyan na ng page number, iba pa rin ang sagot. Hala sige, persist on your belief. Just remember that reality will not bend to your delusions

      Delete
  5. Tumigil na kayo Tape. Di na natapos tapos.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bumaba kasi ratings nila nung hindi na sila EB

    ReplyDelete
  7. At this point, no matter what they do, talo na sila sa mata ng taong bayan. Bakit kaya hindi nila ito ma-gets? And this matters because you are also going after viewership share.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. its not the viewership anymore. ikaw ba naman ang producer ng show tas aangkinin ng mga nagresign na employees mo yung title ng show mo na prinoduce for 44yrs,di ka ba mapapaisip na mali na ata to and filing a case is the remedy.

      Delete
    2. Naku eto na naman ang tagapag tangol ng mga jalosjos. Inaalis si noh kaya napilitan ipaglaban karapatan nila besides paanong aangkinin eh wla pa c jalosjos nung ginawa ni Joey ang eat bulaga. Ang sabihin mo kaya naghahabol kse biglang olats. Sa tingi mo kong super successful ang tp nila at nilampaso nila ang eb hahabol pa?? I doubt!! Sisihin nila yung mga batang jalosjos na masyadong swapang. Gusto imenos presyo ng tvj na masyado daw mataas. Natural!!! Ilang yrs nila trinabaho yan. Kong di nila sinubukang alisin at hinayaan nila yung hiling na paabutin sila kahit 50yrs wla sanang prob. Dapat binigay naman nila yung exit na gusto mangyari sa tvj... pinag hirapan nila yan

      Delete
    3. 11:10 but they are not employees

      Delete
    4. 11:10 Walang pakialam ang mga tao sa technicalities. Basta ang Eat Bulaga maassociate sa TVJ hindi kay Yorme at Paolo.

      Delete
    5. but the producers ay may pakialam sa technicalities. tandaan nyo po 75% po ang ownership ng jalosjos sa tape at 25% kay tuviera.

      Delete
  8. mahaba habang laban pa to mga tvj fans!!!! hahahha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sa TAPE Inc kamo ang mas mahabang laban at burden na patunayan na sa kanila dapat ang titulo. IPOPHL already sided with TVJ, tingin mo kokontrahin ng upper courts ang findings ng agency specific for cases tulad nyan? LOLL

      Delete
    2. nakapending pa po ang appeal ng tape sa ipophl general director. yung nilabas na decision ng marikina rtc eh hindi tugma dun sa kaso na finile ng tvj which is unfair competition at copyright infringement. ang inilabas po ng marikina rtc eh cancellation of trademark for tape which is jurisdiction dapat ng ipophl at di ng rtc. hahahah

      Delete
    3. 3:20 Ikaw rin yung nagcomment sa baba. Please read my reply below. Hahahaha! O, bakit?! Ikaw lang ba may karapatan magcomment nang paulit-ulit. 🤣

      Delete
  9. Mukhang di na masaya sa tahanang pinaka daw

    ReplyDelete
  10. GMA paki bitawan na yang TAPE. OA na mga Jalosjos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bat naman po oa mga jalosjos. eh sila producer ng eat bulaga at nagpapasweldo sa tvj noon?

      Delete
    2. Yes, Fake Bulaga na sila talaga.
      without the name of EAT BULAGA, they are nothing kasi.
      so ayaw nila bumitaw.

      11:09 they dont own the copyright of EAT BULAGA.
      it was very clear from the start.

      Delete
    3. @11:09 Pero ang tanong is sila ba ang gumawa ng name na 'eat bulaga'. Anong klaseng reasoning mo?

      Delete
    4. Nandito na naman ang TAPE defender 🤣

      Delete
    5. Basta nagbabayad sila ng time slot walang pake ang gma sa gyera na yan

      Delete
    6. 11 51 mukha nga...

      Delete
    7. Buhay na namanc ate na pinapa sweldo daw ng tape. Teh!! Kong hinde dahil sa tvj at dabarkads kahit sangkatutak ang pera ng mga jalosjos hinde magtatagal ang eat bulaga.

      Delete
    8. 11:09 mas malaki ang kinita ng TAPE sa TVJ kesa sa swineldo nila. FYI, hindi sila employees but talents. Hindi tatagal ang EB ng 44 years if not for the OG EB staffs and crews' hardwork na hindi inappreciate ng mga Jaloslost

      Delete
  11. san ka nakakita ng isang regional court na ang inilabas na decision eh wala namang kinalaman sa reklamo ng tvj et al against tape. copyright infringement at unfair competition ang kaso pero ang nilabas na decision eh cancellation of trademark?! hahaha! only in the philippines!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IQ mo ateng naging bokya tulad ng TP. Natural pag napatunayan ang copyright infringement, e walang karapatan na irehistro ng TAPE ang trademark kasi nga implication yan ng ruling ng korte.

      Delete
    2. Paulit-ulit comment mo dito na walang sense. Di ko alam kung matatawa ako o maawa sa yo.

      Delete
  12. My gosh! ano pa ba ang pinaglalaban nila? nagsasayang lang sila ng pera. ibabasura lang yan ng SC kung doon sila magfile ng motion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. eh san ba sila dapat magfile? sa barangay? hahahaa

      Delete
    2. 3:15 try nila, baka dun mas may chance. Not in the big leagues where their claim is proven unjust. At wag maliitin ang baranggay, they look after the smallest unit of governance and the lives of the people there.

      Delete
  13. Better na Tiktoclock yung ipalit at least mga Kapuso yung cast.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, just move up the show

      Delete
    2. yes better! Atleast own noontime ng gma!

      Delete
  14. Dear Tape Inc, you can "label" your bag as LV but if the quality is trash, no one will buy it :D :D :D Penoys are notorious with puwede na mentality :) :) :) Mas madali kasing kunin yung branding kesa improve yung programming ;) ;) ;)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Mukhang gumagawa na naman ng issue ang 🏠😀 para mapag-usapan. Ang laki siguro ng ibinaba ng ratings nila. Paiyak iyak, pagpaparinig, dilat mata ni Paolo, yakapan. Di na ata mabenta

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yung tvj po panay parinig sa tp, gusto pa nga ng tatlo na magshutdown ang tape inc tp eh!

      Delete
    2. 3:14 parinig? Or calling out for justice and truth. If you want the abused to be silent, you are a tyrant. The type who will ignore everything else, including what is right, just so you can have your way. That's greed and evil.

      Delete
  16. Daming ads ng TP pero bakit lumiliit ang mga papremyo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually kung susuriin nyong mabuti, kokonti lang ads nung TP, inuulit ulit lang yung mga ads ng same products sa isang adbreak para magmukhang madami/matagal ung adbreak nila.

      Delete
    2. Number of ads should not be the only metric. You need to consider 1) Baka paulit-ulit yung TVCs playing meaning most likely, naka-promo ang TAPE sa advertisers or iilang companies lang nagtitiwala sa kanila and/or 2) Mura ang ad rates nila vs competition so mas madaling maaafford ng ibang brands.

      Delete
  17. this is just sad and pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. baka ikaw ang sad at pathetic,hahaha!

      Delete
  18. hay naku, paulit ulit ‘tong TAPE na ‘to. hndi nga sa inyo yun kaya wag na kayo umasa na papaboran kayo ng kahit sino or kahit saang korte

    ReplyDelete
  19. Talong talo na kayo Jalosjos sa korte at sa mata ng masa. Magmove on na kayo, nawala kasi royalties nyo. Wala naman nanonood ng Tahanang Malapit ng Magsara kaya habol kayo ng habol sa EB ng TVJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kung walang nanonood eh bakit madami silang commercials at sponsors? hahahha

      Delete
    2. Nakita mo na ba views nila ni hindi nga umaabot ng 3000, maswerte na maka 1000 hahaha. I pity you!

      Delete
  20. Hahaha iisa lang yata yung Tape defender dito panay pilit na may laban. Imagine mo imbes na gamitin yung pera para pagandahin nila yung show nila gagamitin pa sa attorney and pagsampa ng kaso. Lol ibang klase rin cringe to the highest level. Swerte na nga siguro nila sa ads nila baka mga na lock in yun nung orig EB days pa kaya d na maka backout.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oo. Siya din yung acclang "temporary title lang po yan" dun sa dating post ng FP. 🤣

      Delete
    2. so what kung nag iisa lang akong tape defender dito. hindi po naging producer or may share ang tvj sa eat bulaga. basahin nyo yung decision ng marikina rtc, di tugma sa kasong inihain ng tvj sa tape.hahahha

      Delete
    3. 11:05 self admitted TAPE defender or employee? You are spreading disinformation and distorting legal interpretation of creative ownership. The Trademark belongs to TVJ as the artistic copyright and creator rights belong to TVJ. To be specific, Joey.couned the term and the 3 grew that show over the years. TAPE is a financier, an investor. Investors can come and go but the product remains with the owner of the concept and the idea unless they sold it to TAPE which they never did. Simple, walang paligoy ligoy. TAPE andnyou are showing greed andnutter disrespect to the courts, to the laws, and to the creators of the concept who, as has been prove , have nurtured this concept and is known to be the people behind the concept by Filipinos for over 4 decades.

      Delete
    4. 11:05 di rin naman producer ang tape during the pilot in 1979

      Delete
    5. 11:05 Walang masama kung tama ang dinedefend mo pero bakla, wala nang sense pinagsasabi mo. O sya, punta ka Marikina RTC at pagalitan mo sila.

      Delete
    6. Napikon na si TAPE defender, alamin mo history ng EB bago ka kumuda dyan, pinangakuan ng TAPE mo ng shares ang TVJ nung wala silang sinisweldo nung naguumpisa pa lang ang Eat Bulaga. Sino ngayon ang manloloko?

      Delete
    7. 1142 fake news ka na naman! hahahha

      Delete
    8. 10:34 documented yan sa mga interviews, aside from producer anong resibo mo na TAPE ang nagcoined ng Eat Bulaga? Sore losers at sobrang pathetic na ng TAPE sa hindi matapos tapos na paghahabol sa EB.

      Delete
    9. From what I know 10:34. Co owners and/producers ang TVJ sa Eat Bulaga tlga and theres a lot of records about this.

      Delete
  21. Ano ba? You are throwing money at a blackhole TAPE. Morally, ethically, technically and creatively wala kayong standing. Kahit si Aling Nene sa turoturo dito sa kanto namin alam yun. Nagdidiskusyun sila nung nga kumakain some days back about it eh, habang nagsestream sila ng Orig EB sa FB nung pinabili ako ni mama ng monggo at adobo. Buti pa si Aling Nene, klaro magisip. Sabi niya kungnsiyabyun, gagawa na lang siya ng bagong show at iinvest na lang ang pera sa isa pang karinderya. Don't lose your capital on a bet na halos alam mong wala ng pagasa. You can still make money elsewhere. Pride won't pay your bills or fix your reputation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. basahin mo kasi yung marikina rtc decision against tape. ang inilabas nilang decision eh cancellation of trademark ng eat bulaga tape, wherein ang kaso naman na finile against tape was copyright infringement at unfair competition. malamang ang tape aapela talaga kasi wala naman sa prayer yung nilabas na decision,hahaha

      Delete
    2. 3:11 Walang reading comprehension? Sa case ng IPO sa IPOPHIL, TVJ ang nanalo. Since the RA on creative ownership applies na blanket pati sa trademark, sakop na yan. Basic. Just think that after the ownership sa IPO is decided, affected na ang lahat ng cases. Precedent na yun. Ask any lawyer. Study precedents.

      Delete
  22. TAPE, find creative young people to help you.Don' t go after TVJ anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  23. TAPE's one last desperate move option

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...