Image courtesy of Twitter: ABSCBNNews
BREAKING: Supreme Court 3rd Div orders dismissal of rape by sexual intercourse and acts of lasciviousness cases vs comedian-host Vhong Navarro after finding that the DOJ did not commit grave abuse of discretion in junking raps filed by Deniece Cornejo. | via @mikenavallo pic.twitter.com/hb5u6zsJKB
— ABS-CBN News (@ABSCBNNews) March 13, 2023
Good! I have always been team Vhong!
ReplyDeleteKung talaga kasing guilty si vhong tagal na sana siya tumakas pumunta ng ibang bansa. Kayang kaya niya yun gawin
DeleteHahahaha San na un Team Deniece
DeleteLabas dali!!! At least hinarap ni Vhong ang kaso niya. Hindi nagtago. Nagpakulong nung may warrant.
TRUTH PREVAILS! GOD IS GOOD ALL THE TIME!!!🙏
DeleteDismissed hindi Acquitted. Know the difference beh
DeleteMay iiyak na naman! Rhymes with rat.
ReplyDeleteYeah. She should have filed a case kesa mag ingay sa socmed.
DeleteHahaha huy di ako natuwa sa balita pero natawa ko sa comment mo
DeleteHuwag na please. Kaumay na.
DeleteThe truth prevailed .
ReplyDelete10:17 PM - A lot of things prevailed here but truth and justice were not among them
Delete1:34am, read the Decision. The SC clearly explained the reasons. Paiba-iba ang sinasabi na kwento ni girl.
Delete2:08, true. Mula pa nung una syang lumabas about Vhong raping her, iba-iba na kwento nya and some parts doesnt match with what cedric and chuwariwap boys' stories
Deletereally? ang lakas ng backer niya
ReplyDelete10:23 Nakaka-tatlong administrasyon na 'tong kaso na 'to. Sa lahat ng admin na yun makapit ang backer? Wow sa lakas ah. Sheesh.
DeleteBacker agad? Di b pwede innocent talaga ung tao
DeleteSupreme Court na yan, backer pa rin?!? Ilang korte na pinagdaanan iisa decision, di mo ba naisip na wala talagang merit yung kaso?
DeleteSinong backer ang makakaimpluwensya sa 5 supreme court magistrates?
DeletePinagsasabi mo diyan? Kita naman sa CCTV walang rape na nangyari doon sa Deniece na yan.
DeleteBacker sa supreme court? I doubt it
DeleteBacker ka pa rin ? Iba na nakaupo sa gobyerno ngayon . Iba na yung Chief Justice .
DeleteSINO ANG BACKER NYA?
DeleteDi ba pwedeng binasura nga dahil paiba iba un statement?!?
Delete10:23 read what the SC stated.
Delete11:44, ang rape na sinasabi ay hindi iyong time na nasa CCTV. A few days before nangyari.
DeleteDati sabi si De Lima ang backer kaya najunk yung case. Ngayon na nakakulong na si De Lima, backer pa din? Grabe si De Lima, kaya niyang ipajunk ang case ni Vhong pero di niya kayang palabasin sarili niya sa kulungan.
DeleteNot a fan of this guy but the illogical comments here are hilarious.
Backer?! e sha nga tong dinetain ng ilang buwan. Yung lawyer nga ni D na si T umatras na dahil alam na mahina ang kaso. Ang tawag dito 'Ipinaglaban ang totoo'
Deletebaks. Napakahirap bayaran ang supreme court.
DeleteIf the decision was not influenced, somehow nakapag tataka pa rin, ang bilis mg decision ng SC, barely 2y ata since appeal was filed.. we all know andaming tumanda sa loob who are still waiting for their day in court. Kahit ata si Hubert Webb, antag al din sa loob before finally ma abswelto.. qhile si Vhong was even allowed to post bail.. so where is justice there?
Delete11:33 inexplain naman bat sya pinayagan magbail.
DeleteHigh profile case po siguro and napadali decision ng SC bec inconsistent and contradicting ang statements ni Deniece. But Ibang iba naman po eto sa case nila Hubert Webb.
DeleteMagpakabait ka na Vhong.
ReplyDeleteNagtanda na yan hehe.
DeleteDeserve!
ReplyDeletewow! Victory for Vhong.
ReplyDeleteGod is good!
ReplyDeleteMagaling abogado neto
ReplyDeleteWoahhh God is soooo good!!
ReplyDeleteAlways been team Vhong, dami bugas ng side ni gurl
ReplyDeleteyes!!!!!
ReplyDeleteEffing goodness! Ano na nangyari sa hustisya??
ReplyDelete12:18 read the news and what the decision of the Supreme Court.
DeleteJustice is not base on your own opinion mukang wala kang alam sa presentation of evidences pa lang sa lower court.napakahabang proseso nyan at may certain time submission. Hindi nakabase sa kung anong tingin mo ay guilty o hindi
Deletekaloka ka! supreme court na po nagdesisyon.
DeleteHustiya?! Itanong mo yan sa anak ng Justice Sec na hindi dumaan sa hustisya.
DeleteMaka react. Andon ka ba nung may ginawa siyang kababalaghan? Guilty until proven nga e. Hinde naprove kaya hinde guilty. Mabuti nga at hinarap nya.
DeleteAyun, justice prevailed. Yun ang nangyare.
DeleteDiyos na bahala sau
ReplyDeleteIkaw nga dyan nanghuhusga kahit walang evidence. Ikaw ang matakot sa diyos
DeleteIba talaga pag may pera at backer. Ang bilis ng desisyon.
ReplyDeleteKung may backer sya hindi sya nakulong. Ibig sabihin ang lakas ng kalaban nya napakulong sya kahit hindi naman matibay ebidensya.
DeleteLuh ilang taon na nakalipas. Lampas dekada na ata,anong mabilis dyan?
DeleteHow rich do you think Vhong is for you to think na kaya nya magbayad sa SC? Showtime na nga lang project nun. 😂
DeleteMay magwawala na nman nyan
ReplyDeleteTapos na. SC na yan eh.
ReplyDeleteSC Third division pa lang. Pwede pa iappeal sa SC en banc, if I'm not mistaken.
DeleteOk cleared na si Vhong. Sana magbago na siya para may good role model ang mga anak niya.
ReplyDeleteNo surprise here. Alam na to as early as last year.
ReplyDeleteIbang klase.
ReplyDeleteSi Deniece? Reading her three different versions of the incident, ibang klase talaga yung ginawa nila kay vhong!
DeletePara sa mga ka-FP na feeling justice didn’t prevail, glaring inconsistencies sa part ni Deniece. Magbasa din tayo ng facts para maliwanagan at mahimasmasan.
ReplyDeleteKorek 2:14 Kaso ang iba dito made up their minds na and not interested to find out the truth. So typical pinoy
DeleteNo offense meant but telling Pinoys to read does not bode well with the majority.
Delete"Facts" and "magbasa" are words that do not exist in majority of the Pinoys' vocabulary.
This is SAD.At Least DC tried.I feel bad for all those other "victims"
ReplyDeleteKapag nagsasabi ka ng totoo hindi paiba iba ang statement mo dahil yun ang talagang nangyari. Kapag nagsisinungaling ka doon nagkakasanga sanga kasi hindi mo matandaan ang nasabi mong kasinungalingan nong una.
DeleteThis has nothing to do wether may ginawa man si Vhong or wala. Sa korte kasi ang basis ng judgment is yung evidence na iprinisinta. Maraming inconsistencies and weak evidence, so talo ka.
ReplyDeleteIiyak na naman ang kampo ni cedric Lee, from the beginning, hnd consistent ang statements ni Deniece against Vhong. Buti it got dismissed.
ReplyDeleteIt's hard to lie. It will lead anyone to inconsistencies.
ReplyDeleteExpected. Weak ang case ni Deniece due to her camp's inconsistencies. Pati na rin yung napakagulo nyang statement. Kaya nga piring ang batas.. because courts are logical. It is based on how you present your case.
ReplyDeleteThis is sad.
ReplyDeletePwedeng nakalusot sya dito, but as always, Karma is watching!
ReplyDeleteHindi mo puedeng i convict ang tao ng wala kang evidence tapos yung statement mo pa paiba iba. Dapat nga hindi umurong itog kaso na ito eh dahil wala namang ebidensya. Pero lakas nila Cedric ah dahil kahit wala silang matibay na ebidensya at na pawalang sala na si Vhong nong una naipakulong pa rin nila kahit papano. May backer siguro sila Cedric para magawa yun. Kaso pagdating sa supreme court di nag prosper.
ReplyDelete7:27 all other victims po, yung isa dismissed din ang kaso then yung isa hindi nagkaso kaya nagpaparinig na lang sa socmed. at etong isa dismissed then so paano nga po sila mabibigyan ng hustisya kung sila ang statement nila ang problema
ReplyDelete