Sunday, November 7, 2021

Not Listening

Image courtesy of www.vectorstock.com

Sometime ago, Female Talent (FT) and Male Celebrity (MC) decided to see if love would indeed be lovelier the second time around. That decision meant accepting each other’s flaws and moving on from the hurt and pain of their previous time together. As friends were excited at FT and MC giving their relationship a second chance, Respected Elder (RE) was cynical.

RE was aware of the reason why FT called it quits. FT found out about an alleged Third Party (TP) and the trust was broken. Hence, RE could not understand why FT softened up. Apparently, when FT saw MC again online, she noticed he was more attractive. MC later visited FT and he took the opportunity to win her over again. The walls of the bedroom were the witness of the happiness of FT with MC again. FT felt the spark and the need for MC to be back in her life.

When FT told RE about the development, she said she was happy. RE asked her to rethink her decision given that infidelity was the cause of the break-up. FT said that MC assured her that he is no longer seeing TP.

RE remained doubtful. A production staff, who is friends with TP, squealed to RE that MC is still seeing TP. Besides, TP was the reason, not FT, why MC was looking good. Instead of letting FT know what was told her, RE prodded FT to rethink her decision. FT was not hearing anything and was determined to welcome back MC.

‘Reconciliation is a part of the healing process, but how can there be healing when the wounds are still being inflicted?’ − N. K. Jemisin

Please abide by the GUIDELINES in writing comments if you want them to be posted. Initials and comments that are too explicit will not be accepted.

Follow @FashionPulis on Twitter for the latest update. Please continue to send your juicy stories to michaelsylim@fashionpulis.com. Thank you very much for loving Fashion PULIS!

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of Fashion PULIS. The management reserves the right to exclude comments that do not comply with the GUIDELINES in writing comments.

11 comments: