12:54 palusot dot com eh di dapat sya una nag file ng kaso sa Viva for breach of contract. Hindi yung revoke revoke chuchu sa telepono o telegrama lang. Alam natin na kapag may kontrata ka pinirmahan, kailangan may Court order kung ayaw mo na sa kontrata may legal procedure dyan. You cannot take the law into your hands.
Honor the contract with Viva, hindi yung nagbook sya ng activities na di kasama Viva! Ganun na ba siya kagipit at yung management fees eh di nya binayaran?
40% cut her for the last 15 years! She still honors existing third party contract originally made with viva but viva breached when they dont consider her wishes, preferences, educational request and stuff. So she has every right to terminate it and go thru arbitration. Who wants to be tied to that for another 15 years?
2:36 Nope. Not everyone looks like 20 something going to 40 lol. Baka ikaw mukhang matanda like her. Nandamay ka pa. Tingnan mo nalang si Lucy Torres dun sa isang post, dalaga body parin si tita mo Lucy.
They have even bigger stars than her and they did not complain. She should have done all the conplaining nung walang wala pa siya. She was given projects after projects pero d pa rin siya kuntento. Other artists who wants to have a lead role on big screen never got thw chance. Viva gambled a whole lot of money on her. She does not have the x factor to becone a big star and yet she was given the chance. Why sign a contact if you cant honor it. Kapunan surely will give her client reassurance for obvious reasons. I used to like nadine but the fillers that she put on her face went to her brain. She better do some reality check before it is too late.
40% I think used to be 50% pa nga normally for artists and managers nila. Nothing wrong with that to think na overhyped siya and walang ROI, swerte pa nga yan sa VIVA kaya lang inggrata eh
12:36 depende sa meaning ng breach of contract by Viva, pwedeng hindi sila nag provide ng make up artist or stylist sa isang event. Still malaki ang 40% usually 15-30% ang cut.
No name naman kasi sila dati so ano ba naman ang 40% compared sa walang trabaho? Then again, ang dami namang bigger stars sa Viva. Ano yun, di marunong magnegotiate si Nadine? At least sana pinaliitan nya ang duration from 10 years, di ba? And better exit clauses?
Kung hindi naman pala okay sa kanya ang 40% eh bakit siya pumirma? So pinirmahan niya ng hindi naintindihan nakasulat sa contract? Wala naman baril nakatutok sa kanya para pirmahan niya ang contract.
4:02 Wag kang butthurt. Depende sa laman ng contract and kung beneficial siya pagsikat then YES go! Which is what she did. Pero umalis si boylet ex sa Viva so guess what happened? Let’s be real sa real reason.
normal naman mga sagot nya. actually mas awkward is yung mga direct line questions. like direct line to the moon. ano naman nga sasabihin ko sa moon? pwede ka ba tirhan ganun?
Pansin ko naman kay Nadine ay pagka pretentious kaya minsan inconsistent yung sinasabi. Kapag ang sinasabi mo galing sa puso, you become an eloquent speaker, you don’t think about it and words come out naturally. Isa pa, gusto nya pasosyal na English kahit hindi nya forte ang English language kaya nangangapa sya sa English words to express her thoughts.
pumayag din nmn kc sya in the 1st place sa 40percent cut. normal lng un sa showbz. kaya nga un iba prefer nila manager mommy nila para saknla lahat income. simple lng nmn yan. kng ayaw. eh d wag pumirma agad. makipag negotiate.
True naman. Meron naman shang parents na ksma before she agreed and signed yung contract. Kung lugi sila, dpt linausap muna ang viba para possibly ma modify.
Parang regular employee lang na nag apply, inofferan ng specific amt ng pay, inaccept tapos magrereklamo na maliit bayad. Kaloka.
Yup if you signed the contract then it is supposed to be honored. Makikita naman ng korte kung di siya naalagaan ng viva. She is very lucky na mababait sila boss vic. Kinawawa lang nya :)
As far as I know, parents ata niya yung nakipag negotiate with Viva since she was still a minor nung signing ng contract so wala siyang say. Yun lang yung sad kasi ang laki ng cut plus ang tagal pa ng bond. Unlike sa ibang network na 5 years lang ata.
12:58 ganto kasi yan, sa kinikita nya, may lawyer na dapat talaga sya na naghahandle ng legal docs nya. Naafford nya nga si Kapunan oh! So di mo na masisisi yung Viva. Pinirmahan nya, nag-agree sya. Kakulangan na sa side nya yung di pag-intindi ng mga docs na pinipirmahan nya. Normal na employee nga marunong magnegotiate ng contract, bakit sya di ba nya kaya???
Sorry ha! parang napaghinaan siya ng loob sa pag explain ni Tito Boy sa statement ni attorney. Hinde ko alam naiintindihan pa niya or hinde or was she confused? Napansin ko lang sa galaw at expression niya. She knows deep inside This case is Just a waste Of time and at the same time may pagsisi. Hahahaha
Sa akin lang ito.. isang observant chismosa lang ako ni FP! Hahahaha
Kung slave contract man yun, she should have reopened it for negotiation, bought her way out, or have it null and void first in court before accepting other gigs.
Online concert ba (sorry di kasi ako updated sa ganap nya, sa xlip lang sa taas ko nalamang may concert sya)? If that's the case, anong difference ng VVIP tickets? Curious lang po.
May behind scene coverage ata sa vvip, and maybe pati ito meron din video con with nadz sa lahat ng vvip like other concerts na bfore like vice this july, regine before din...
Ano naman ngayon? Hindi naman sapilitan yan. Siyempre kung gusto mo magpamanage sa kanila eh magcocompromise ka. Otherwise, mag self manage ka. Natural you’re gonna get access to Viva’s resources alangan namang magpauto sila sa kaunting share sa kita?
I just wonder why Viva revised the subsisting 5-year renewal contract of Nadine halfway thru (after 2014 and before expiry in 2019) and added another 10 years to it to expire in 2029, or a total of 15 years for a renewal contract. Let’s just suppose the fact that James Reid’s contract was expiring on 2019 without renewal, and Viva deemed fit to lock in Nadine to Viva so James Reid and Nadine Lustre cannot both run away with the “Jadine loveteam formula” under their cape. As to why Viva was able to forge a “slave contract” on Nadine halfway thru and at that time she was no longer a minor and can sign the contract did not have the likes of Atty Kapunan review that revised contract is the question. It’s too late after you have signed the contract, Nadine.
Gusto ko malaman kung may ibang contract artist ang Viva na may 15 years na kontrata kagaya ni Nadine??? At kung lahat ng mga contract artist ng Viva ay 40% commission ng Viva kagaya kay Nadine??? Or kay Nadine lang ganyan? Hmmmm
Asan ang lawyer ni Nadine nung binigay sa kanya ang contract?
Pwedeng sa mga struggling new artist ganyan ang percentage, kasi may level or risk and investment sa kanila. Pero sa mga established names na may sariling PA entourage, makeup artists, and lawyers (like Sharon C), hindi.
Bat sya pumayag in yhe first place? So feeling nya sikat na sya and making more than before eh feel nya nalalamangan na sya ng agency? So ungrateful hypocrite. Y'all
Malaki ang 40% sa totoo pero para ano lang po, i find this thing ungrateful kasi Viva ang nag build up at nag launch ng career nya bago pa nag bigay ng break ang ibang production companies.
Kahit ano pa sabihin ng mga fans ni Nadine, she is a classic example of lumaki ang ulo and she'll never admit to it. At the end of the day, you have to honor your contract or at least nakipagusap ka ng maayos sa management mo.
yes 40% cut is such a steal BUT nakinabang ka naman sa viva at nagkapangalan. 15yrs, maybe a long time but sometimes it takes so long bago mapasikat ang artista. look at jodi sta. maria, recent na lang sumikat kahit ang tagal na nya sa star magic. point is, hindi nagrereklamo si nadine against viva nung baguhan sya. nakatikim ng konting fame, lumaki ang ulo - naging pasosyal pa. i'm with viva on this one.
Real talk - something that Viva’s other contract artists did not do on Viva out of respect and gratitude. But not the rebel Queen Nega. Ika nga ni Nadine sa tweet, “Pay up! Stop with your shenanigans!”
Just because there is a signed contract between the parties doesn't mean that the contract is legal. If a contract is severely unfair to one of the parties such that it becomes unconscionable, it can be deemed unenforceable under the law. Not all parties to a contract are on equal footing when they are at the bargaining table. In this case, Nadine was a minor and Viva had the experience, the power, and the resources. She may have been pressured to sign because she thought it was her lifeline. Imho, a 40% cut and a 15-year-long contract is unconscionable. - Not a fan, just someone schooled in the law
How old is she? Pangalawang sign na ata niya yan. If nagsign siya 5 years ago pr 6 years ago di na siya minor. If minor man siya hindi ba kasama ang parents magsign sa ganun?
Uhm? It was not a full on 15 year old contract. And when the contract was extended she wasn’t a minor na when she signed. It’s her fault that she didn’t read it and negotiate kung feel niya na slave contract yung pipirmahan niya. Walang pilitan dito. She was not made to sign at gunpoint. And the fact that QC RTC already decided that the contract is legal and binding means valid yun. Anong pinagsasasabi mo? Maybe you should read back and check the decision on a previous post. You’re too late sa balita.
since she was a minor, then most probably, her parents were with her to advise her and all, pero still, na pirmahan yung contract...if she was dehado,or pressured, dapat noon pa, kumuha na sya nang lawyer to deal with that.
A contract is not for convenience of Nadine, too. Take it or leave it. You sign it, then you bind yourself. C’mon don’t play the victim card for Nadine. Only Viva took a chance on Nadine when she was a nobody; now that she is thrust into the limelight and made bankable by Viva, she bites the hand of Viva and wants all the money for herself. That’s more greedy on her part especially in the Filipino culture of - utang na loob.
sus, if you are schooled in the law, you should have known that signed contract enjoys presumption of regularity and validity. the burden of proof rests on the party who assails its validity.
Hindi ba kalinaw linaw ng kontrata kapag sinabi 5, 10, 15 years at 40% commission ng Viva. Kelangan pa ba i explain yun? Just do the math!!! At kung ayaw mo wag mo pirmahan. Simple.
11:42, you talk nonsense. You are “schooled in the law” yet you don’t understand the law. Too funny. What’s the use of a signed contract if it’s not valid?
Yan din ang pagkakaalam ko pero it was already brought to court and despite all that the court still ruled in Viva's favor, unfortunately. Valid pa din daw contract, idaan na lang daw sa arbitration. Tsk.
Whether you are a fan or not, you have to admit that not all contracts are fair especially kung may power dynamic. Ang problema sa mga pilipino is lack of critical thinking skills talaga...
Wala man lang nakaka-appreciate kay Nadine dito. She’s elegant in my eyes. Effortlessly stunning and confident. Matalino sumagot sa mga interviews. She can standout on her own. Yan ang napansin ko sa kanya kaya I admire her as a person not just because she is Nadine.
12:44 patawa ka? Yung mga editorial shots nya. Sige, Give ko na sa kanya gumaling na sya doon. Pero yung matalino sumagot? Dami fillers... saka pag di maituloy ang english sesegway.
Nadine owe a lot from VIVA. di sya binitawan all throughout her career journey and transportation from being part of a girl band, playing bit roles in movies, casting her in TV series and appearances. I think she should learn to show gratitude in return.
40% was not enough to build her and make her what she is now. she never either had a name when handled during her day1 in the agency in the first place.
ang tagal niya na sa viva napaka timing namang tsaka siya uminda sa 40% nung umalis si ex sa agency, ano yun last year niya lang narealize na may mali sa contract niya eh she is 27yrs old na. duda akong dahil sa commission yan malakas talaga ang feel kong si james lang ang dahilan niya. nadines love for james vs the world. ang tindi magmahal hahamakin ang lahat. lol
Very awkward na situation ni Nadine. Feeling ko she needs advice from friends/mentors with more maturity, masyado na kasi sya napapaligiran ng mga pa-cool friends na petiks-petiks lang, puro mga laki sa layaw. Wag na dapat sya makigaya sa ganung attitude. I admire her for wanting creative freedom (in fairness angat naman yung quality ng music videos nya ngayon unlike the usual cheap baduy productions na typical sa Pinoy showbiz) pero she can't just walk out from her obligations or throw tantrums. Even if she's unhappy with Viva she has to act professional and settle her affairs ng maayos
Kadiri yung kumakampi sa oppressors. 40% cut is too much, more than 10 years contract is too much don't compare it sa mga idol nyo because you don't know kung iba or pareho sila but im glad she tries to fight it.
Mas maganda kung ituloy hanggang Supreme Court ni Atty Kapunan ang issue ng revocation of agency contract at will by principal. Para magkaroon ng jurisprudence sa mga talent and agency management relations kung ano ang reasonable terms and conditions. Di kaila na sa kalakaran ng monopolya sa talent agencies, madami din na struggling artists na naabuso in terms of oppressive and unconscionable terms at wala sila magawa kundi tanggapin ang mga onerous contracts ng isang malaki na agency kagaya ng Viva atbp.
Negadine strikes again! Honor your contract kasi 💅
ReplyDeleteShe did honor her contract and continued with her booked activities even after Viva breached their contract.
Delete12:54 echusera ka teh
Delete12:54 palusot dot com eh di dapat sya una nag file ng kaso sa Viva for breach of contract. Hindi yung revoke revoke chuchu sa telepono o telegrama lang. Alam natin na kapag may kontrata ka pinirmahan, kailangan may Court order kung ayaw mo na sa kontrata may legal procedure dyan. You cannot take the law into your hands.
Delete12:54 how exactly did Viva breach their own contract?
Delete12.54 tard spotted
DeleteHonor the contract with Viva, hindi yung nagbook sya ng activities na di kasama Viva! Ganun na ba siya kagipit at yung management fees eh di nya binayaran?
Delete40% cut her for the last 15 years! She still honors existing third party contract originally made with viva but viva breached when they dont consider her wishes, preferences, educational request and stuff. So she has every right to terminate it and go thru arbitration. Who wants to be tied to that for another 15 years?
DeleteStressed itchura ni nadz ah
ReplyDeleteShe really aged….
Delete3:35 Don't we all? Lol
Delete2:36 Nope. Not everyone looks like 20 something going to 40 lol. Baka ikaw mukhang matanda like her. Nandamay ka pa. Tingnan mo nalang si Lucy Torres dun sa isang post, dalaga body parin si tita mo Lucy.
DeleteGrabe 40% pala ang cut ng Viva kay Nadine.
ReplyDeleteWhat’s included in that 40 kaya? Baka sa kanila makeup/stylist/ clothes / promotion/
Delete12:36 YES.
Delete12:26 andami kasi prinoprovide and ginagawa ng viva for her, so its kinda understandable why
Delete11:26 Akala ko 20% lang ang commission ng mga managers sa showbiz? Lahat kaya ng management ganyan kalaki?
DeleteThey have even bigger stars than her and they did not complain. She should have done all the conplaining nung walang wala pa siya. She was given projects after projects pero d pa rin siya kuntento. Other artists who wants to have a lead role on big screen never got thw chance. Viva gambled a whole lot of money on her. She does not have the x factor to becone a big star and yet she was given the chance. Why sign a contact if you cant honor it. Kapunan surely will give her client reassurance for obvious reasons. I used to like nadine but the fillers that she put on her face went to her brain. She better do some reality check before it is too late.
Delete40% I think used to be 50% pa nga normally for artists and managers nila. Nothing wrong with that to think na overhyped siya and walang ROI, swerte pa nga yan sa VIVA kaya lang inggrata eh
Delete30% is the STANDARD COMMISSION OF TALENT MANAGERS
Deletekapag mas malake ang kita
E.g. MILLIONS in endorsement
20% lang
12:36 depende sa meaning ng breach of contract by Viva, pwedeng hindi sila nag provide ng make up artist or stylist sa isang event. Still malaki ang 40% usually 15-30% ang cut.
Delete1:17 sa palagay mo yung bigger stars nila ay tatangapin ang 40% cut sa tf? parang slave labor na yun.
Delete40% is still big. Di rin naman ganun ka engrande promotions sakanila or even their outfits. Nasa range ng 20 - 25% yan.
Deleteang alam ko 30% dapat. pero 10 yrs ago ko pa narinig yun.
DeleteNo name naman kasi sila dati so ano ba naman ang 40% compared sa walang trabaho? Then again, ang dami namang bigger stars sa Viva. Ano yun, di marunong magnegotiate si Nadine? At least sana pinaliitan nya ang duration from 10 years, di ba? And better exit clauses?
Deleteokay pala sa inyo 40% eh di bakit di nalang gawin 90% commission para sulit pang alipin. tapos iapply nyo sa mga sarili nyo. ok ba?
DeleteKung hindi naman pala okay sa kanya ang 40% eh bakit siya pumirma? So pinirmahan niya ng hindi naintindihan nakasulat sa contract? Wala naman baril nakatutok sa kanya para pirmahan niya ang contract.
Delete4:02 Wag kang butthurt. Depende sa laman ng contract and kung beneficial siya pagsikat then YES go! Which is what she did. Pero umalis si boylet ex sa Viva so guess what happened? Let’s be real sa real reason.
DeleteAng laki ng cut. Totoo ba 40%?
ReplyDeleteSa korte ka na lang magpaliwanag chusera ka Ate Nadz ya’ll!
ReplyDeleteHer answers to simple Direct line questions of Boy Abunda reveals walang depth si Nadine, daming dead air and cringe worthy answers.
ReplyDeletePansin ko din. Sobrang sabaw. :(
Deletepansin ko rin.. hindi pala sya quick and sharp.. baka exhausted lang.. minsan kasi the brain doesnt work fast when tired.
Deletenormal naman mga sagot nya. actually mas awkward is yung mga direct line questions. like direct line to the moon. ano naman nga sasabihin ko sa moon? pwede ka ba tirhan ganun?
Delete12:37 pakadaming "like"
DeletePansin ko naman kay Nadine ay pagka pretentious kaya minsan inconsistent yung sinasabi. Kapag ang sinasabi mo galing sa puso, you become an eloquent speaker, you don’t think about it and words come out naturally. Isa pa, gusto nya pasosyal na English kahit hindi nya forte ang English language kaya nangangapa sya sa English words to express her thoughts.
DeleteGanyan mga sagot na kunwari carefree and all… yan ang affected sa mga ganap sa kanyang buhay lalo na sa kaso nila ng Viva.
Deletepumayag din nmn kc sya in the 1st place sa 40percent cut. normal lng un sa showbz. kaya nga un iba prefer nila manager mommy nila para saknla lahat income. simple lng nmn yan. kng ayaw. eh d wag pumirma agad. makipag negotiate.
ReplyDeleteTrue naman. Meron naman shang parents na ksma before she agreed and signed yung contract. Kung lugi sila, dpt linausap muna ang viba para possibly ma modify.
DeleteParang regular employee lang na nag apply, inofferan ng specific amt ng pay, inaccept tapos magrereklamo na maliit bayad. Kaloka.
Hindi po normal ang 40%. Actually that's a slave contract na. And the law should be protecting artists from contracts like that.
DeleteYup if you signed the contract then it is supposed to be honored. Makikita naman ng korte kung di siya naalagaan ng viva. She is very lucky na mababait sila boss vic. Kinawawa lang nya :)
DeleteAs far as I know, parents ata niya yung nakipag negotiate with Viva since she was still a minor nung signing ng contract so wala siyang say. Yun lang yung sad kasi ang laki ng cut plus ang tagal pa ng bond. Unlike sa ibang network na 5 years lang ata.
Delete12:58 hindi talaga normal and 40% kasi 50% pa nga yan dapat. You’re such a tard
Delete12:58 ganto kasi yan, sa kinikita nya, may lawyer na dapat talaga sya na naghahandle ng legal docs nya. Naafford nya nga si Kapunan oh! So di mo na masisisi yung Viva. Pinirmahan nya, nag-agree sya. Kakulangan na sa side nya yung di pag-intindi ng mga docs na pinipirmahan nya. Normal na employee nga marunong magnegotiate ng contract, bakit sya di ba nya kaya???
DeleteNapaka ungrateful ng babae na ito. Dami issue sa life! Parang wala pandemia dumaan sa buhay niya. Bahala ka na nga. IM so over na sa kanya.
ReplyDeleteBye
Sorry ha! parang napaghinaan siya ng loob sa pag explain ni Tito Boy sa statement ni attorney. Hinde ko alam naiintindihan pa niya or hinde or was she confused? Napansin ko lang sa galaw at expression niya. She knows deep inside This case is Just a waste Of time and at the same time may pagsisi. Hahahaha
ReplyDeleteSa akin lang ito.. isang observant chismosa lang ako ni FP! Hahahaha
15 years and 40% cut? That is a slave contract.
ReplyDelete12:54 That's what I was thinking. People who like to bash Nadine are so full of hate for her that they can't even see how wrong this is.
DeleteShe would get 0% of nothing if it wasnt for VIVA making her a star
DeleteKung slave contract man yun, she should have reopened it for negotiation, bought her way out, or have it null and void first in court before accepting other gigs.
DeleteHindi yang nagpaka-rogue artist siya, hahaha!
Edi sana hindi siya pumirma ng kontrata tapos ngayon magrereklamo siya. E hindi pa nga siya superstar like Sarah, Anne, Vice na walang reklamo sa viva
Deleteokay sa inyo na ang 100%. kung ano anong aning aning pa kinocompare at contrast nyo.
Delete4:06 Pinapaliwanagan kasi sa reasoning ng 40%. Walang sinabing wag na kumita ang artista. Lol.
Delete40% cut sa upcoming concert nya tapos Viva didn't even lift a finger?! GRABE VIVA!
ReplyDeleteA contract is a contract, ganun talaga...
DeleteSino bang nagsabing magconcert siya outside Viva
DeleteOnline concert ba (sorry di kasi ako updated sa ganap nya, sa xlip lang sa taas ko nalamang may concert sya)? If that's the case, anong difference ng VVIP tickets? Curious lang po.
ReplyDeleteKapag VVIP may sounds na malakas😂
DeleteMay behind scene coverage ata sa vvip, and maybe pati ito meron din video con with nadz sa lahat ng vvip like other concerts na bfore like vice this july, regine before din...
Delete12:57 baka sa zoom ng Cameraman?? haha
DeleteTho ungrateful talaga itong si ate girl. Somehow nalaman din mga tao gaano kalaki pala amg cut ng viva sa mga artists nila
ReplyDeleteAno naman ngayon? Hindi naman sapilitan yan. Siyempre kung gusto mo magpamanage sa kanila eh magcocompromise ka. Otherwise, mag self manage ka. Natural you’re gonna get access to Viva’s resources alangan namang magpauto sila sa kaunting share sa kita?
DeleteGirl sinugalan siya ng Viva. Training, workshops etc. baka pati makeover.
Delete1:55 sabihin mo pati Best Actress awards influencer ang Viva dyan
DeleteI just wonder why Viva revised the subsisting 5-year renewal contract of Nadine halfway thru (after 2014 and before expiry in 2019) and added another 10 years to it to expire in 2029, or a total of 15 years for a renewal contract. Let’s just suppose the fact that James Reid’s contract was expiring on 2019 without renewal, and Viva deemed fit to lock in Nadine to Viva so James Reid and Nadine Lustre cannot both run away with the “Jadine loveteam formula” under their cape. As to why Viva was able to forge a “slave contract” on Nadine halfway thru and at that time she was no longer a minor and can sign the contract did not have the likes of Atty Kapunan review that revised contract is the question. It’s too late after you have signed the contract, Nadine.
ReplyDeleteGusto ko malaman kung may ibang contract artist ang Viva na may 15 years na kontrata kagaya ni Nadine??? At kung lahat ng mga contract artist ng Viva ay 40% commission ng Viva kagaya kay Nadine??? Or kay Nadine lang ganyan? Hmmmm
DeleteTHIS! for such contract, need na talaga nya magconsult ng lawyer
DeleteAsan ang lawyer ni Nadine nung binigay sa kanya ang contract?
DeletePwedeng sa mga struggling new artist ganyan ang percentage, kasi may level or risk and investment sa kanila. Pero sa mga established names na may sariling PA entourage, makeup artists, and lawyers (like Sharon C), hindi.
Bat sya pumayag in yhe first place? So feeling nya sikat na sya and making more than before eh feel nya nalalamangan na sya ng agency? So ungrateful hypocrite. Y'all
ReplyDeletesuper ibang klase na sya magsalita
ReplyDeleteIka nga ni James Reid, “Always read your contract.”
ReplyDeleteYung akala mo umalis sya sa Viva to self-manage herself daw.. pero nagpa contract artist sa Careless label ni James Reid.
ReplyDeletePanay pirma sa mga kontrata na hindi naman nya naiintindihan pala lels
DeleteGurrrl kasi dapat talaga nagpalumot ka muna sa industriya kahit konti bago ka nagmaganda. Nalunod ka kasi agad sa isang basong tubig ei
ReplyDeleteMalaki ang 40% sa totoo pero para ano lang po, i find this thing ungrateful kasi Viva ang nag build up at nag launch ng career nya bago pa nag bigay ng break ang ibang production companies.
ReplyDeleteOpinion lang naman po.
Maliit pa yang 40 percent sa kpop 50-95 percent ang kinukuha ng agency
ReplyDeleteNadine: Ammmm… ammmm… ammmm… ammmm. Ok lang magtagalog, Teh. Try mo.
ReplyDeleteKahit ano pa sabihin ng mga fans ni Nadine, she is a classic example of lumaki ang ulo and she'll never admit to it. At the end of the day, you have to honor your contract or at least nakipagusap ka ng maayos sa management mo.
ReplyDeleteyes 40% cut is such a steal BUT nakinabang ka naman sa viva at nagkapangalan. 15yrs, maybe a long time but sometimes it takes so long bago mapasikat ang artista. look at jodi sta. maria, recent na lang sumikat kahit ang tagal na nya sa star magic. point is, hindi nagrereklamo si nadine against viva nung baguhan sya. nakatikim ng konting fame, lumaki ang ulo - naging pasosyal pa. i'm with viva on this one.
ReplyDeleteReal talk - something that Viva’s other contract artists did not do on Viva out of respect and gratitude. But not the rebel Queen Nega. Ika nga ni Nadine sa tweet, “Pay up! Stop with your shenanigans!”
DeleteViva invested in her. Wag syang ano sa 40%.
ReplyDeleteumay na kami hahah
ReplyDeleteJust because there is a signed contract between the parties doesn't mean that the contract is legal. If a contract is severely unfair to one of the parties such that it becomes unconscionable, it can be deemed unenforceable under the law. Not all parties to a contract are on equal footing when they are at the bargaining table. In this case, Nadine was a minor and Viva had the experience, the power, and the resources. She may have been pressured to sign because she thought it was her lifeline. Imho, a 40% cut and a 15-year-long contract is unconscionable.
ReplyDelete- Not a fan, just someone schooled in the law
How old is she? Pangalawang sign na ata niya yan. If nagsign siya 5 years ago pr 6 years ago di na siya minor. If minor man siya hindi ba kasama ang parents magsign sa ganun?
DeleteUhm? It was not a full on 15 year old contract. And when the contract was extended she wasn’t a minor na when she signed. It’s her fault that she didn’t read it and negotiate kung feel niya na slave contract yung pipirmahan niya. Walang pilitan dito. She was not made to sign at gunpoint. And the fact that QC RTC already decided that the contract is legal and binding means valid yun. Anong pinagsasasabi mo? Maybe you should read back and check the decision on a previous post. You’re too late sa balita.
Deletesince she was a minor, then most probably, her parents were with her to advise her and all, pero still, na pirmahan yung contract...if she was dehado,or pressured, dapat noon pa, kumuha na sya nang lawyer to deal with that.
DeleteHindi sya minor noong nag sign sya ng contract recently
DeleteA contract is not for convenience of Nadine, too. Take it or leave it. You sign it, then you bind yourself. C’mon don’t play the victim card for Nadine. Only Viva took a chance on Nadine when she was a nobody; now that she is thrust into the limelight and made bankable by Viva, she bites the hand of Viva and wants all the money for herself. That’s more greedy on her part especially in the Filipino culture of - utang na loob.
DeleteBut nag renew na siya diba? Minor pa ba siya when she signed a new contract with Viva?
Delete11:42 kung hindi legal ang contract ni Nadine sa Viva bakit sila ang kinampihan ng korte? Paki explain nga.
Deletesus, if you are schooled in the law, you should have known that signed contract enjoys presumption of regularity and validity. the burden of proof rests on the party who assails its validity.
DeleteHindi ba kalinaw linaw ng kontrata kapag sinabi 5, 10, 15 years at 40% commission ng Viva. Kelangan pa ba i explain yun? Just do the math!!! At kung ayaw mo wag mo pirmahan. Simple.
Delete11:42, you talk nonsense. You are “schooled in the law” yet you don’t understand the law. Too funny. What’s the use of a signed contract if it’s not valid?
DeleteYan din ang pagkakaalam ko pero it was already brought to court and despite all that the court still ruled in Viva's favor, unfortunately. Valid pa din daw contract, idaan na lang daw sa arbitration. Tsk.
DeleteWhether you are a fan or not, you have to admit that not all contracts are fair especially kung may power dynamic. Ang problema sa mga pilipino is lack of critical thinking skills talaga...
ReplyDeleteKagaya ni Nadine pumirma hindi binasa yung contract…
Delete12:41 so kung unfair ang contract bakit pinirmahan? At kung talagang maraming violation ang contract bakit kinampihan ng korte ang Viva?
DeleteWala man lang nakaka-appreciate kay Nadine dito. She’s elegant in my eyes. Effortlessly stunning and confident. Matalino sumagot sa mga interviews. She can standout on her own. Yan ang napansin ko sa kanya kaya I admire her as a person not just because she is Nadine.
ReplyDeleteNatawa ako seryoso haha
DeleteFantard speak
Delete12:44 patawa ka? Yung mga editorial shots nya. Sige, Give ko na sa kanya gumaling na sya doon. Pero yung matalino sumagot? Dami fillers... saka pag di maituloy ang english sesegway.
DeleteNadine owe a lot from VIVA. di sya binitawan all throughout her career journey and transportation from being part of a girl band, playing bit roles in movies, casting her in TV series and appearances. I think she should learn to show gratitude in return.
ReplyDelete40% was not enough to build her and make her what she is now. she never either had a name when handled during her day1 in the agency in the first place.
Journey and Transformation you mean..
DeleteNatawa ako sa 'transportation' !
DeleteAng laki ng 40% peri bakit ka mag aagree sa contract lalo na if feel mo walang freedom?
ReplyDeleteang tagal niya na sa viva napaka timing namang tsaka siya uminda sa 40% nung umalis si ex sa agency, ano yun last year niya lang narealize na may mali sa contract niya eh she is 27yrs old na. duda akong dahil sa commission yan malakas talaga ang feel kong si james lang ang dahilan niya. nadines love for james vs the world. ang tindi magmahal hahamakin ang lahat. lol
DeletePede mo naman i-buy out contract mo teh. Total g na g ka ng umalis.
ReplyDeleteVery awkward na situation ni Nadine. Feeling ko she needs advice from friends/mentors with more maturity, masyado na kasi sya napapaligiran ng mga pa-cool friends na petiks-petiks lang, puro mga laki sa layaw. Wag na dapat sya makigaya sa ganung attitude. I admire her for wanting creative freedom (in fairness angat naman yung quality ng music videos nya ngayon unlike the usual cheap baduy productions na typical sa Pinoy showbiz) pero she can't just walk out from her obligations or throw tantrums. Even if she's unhappy with Viva she has to act professional and settle her affairs ng maayos
ReplyDeleteKadiri yung kumakampi sa oppressors. 40% cut is too much, more than 10 years contract is too much don't compare it sa mga idol nyo because you don't know kung iba or pareho sila but im glad she tries to fight it.
ReplyDeleteMas maganda kung ituloy hanggang Supreme Court ni Atty Kapunan ang issue ng revocation of agency contract at will by principal. Para magkaroon ng jurisprudence sa mga talent and agency management relations kung ano ang reasonable terms and conditions. Di kaila na sa kalakaran ng monopolya sa talent agencies, madami din na struggling artists na naabuso in terms of oppressive and unconscionable terms at wala sila magawa kundi tanggapin ang mga onerous contracts ng isang malaki na agency kagaya ng Viva atbp.
ReplyDeleteAng laki ng cut kaloka. Kaya lang pumirma sya eh dapat nung una pa lang at ganun na ang patakaran di na sya pumirma ulit.
ReplyDeleteLeast Nadine can do now is to understand her case. Don’t be careless about the case as you were careless with your agency contract. imo
ReplyDelete