Sunday, October 18, 2020

Costly Ghosting

Image courtesy of www.pumptiniproductions.wordpress.com

While waiting for her next project, Experienced Celebrity (EC) would be seen in social gatherings and mingling with the high-end crowd. Over the years, EC has built her reputation as a talented member of the entertainment industry. In addition, controversy hounded her personal life, which is typical for celebrities. Thus, her face looked familiar to non-showbiz people.

Hot in the grapevine is the story about EC’s dealings with a Rich Guy (RG). EC flirted with RG and RG fell for the trap. The efforts of EC resulted in a high-end practical gift from RG. Consequently, RG expected something in return. He was disappointed and his waiting brought nothing, as EC was no longer as responsive as before to him. There was no explanation why EC was avoiding him. In other words, he was ghosted.

Allegedly, EC found a Richer Man (RM) in lieu of RG. EC charmed and tried to win over the older man, who is engaged in a relevant field these days. However, EC was not the type RM would fall for. Alas, EC’s techniques failed and she was unable to woo RM.

With her potential benefactor lost, EC went back to RG. This time, RG was smart and realized that he was just a fall back. Being ignored by EC made him skeptical over her return. Hence, he closed the doors and EC was left with no RG and RM.

‘“Why must there always be a price to pay for every indulgence, and why must it so often be withdrawn from the bankrupt accounts of the innocent?’ ― Andrew Levkoff

Please abide by the GUIDELINES in writing comments if you want them to be posted. Initials and comments that are too explicit will not be accepted.

Follow @FashionPulis on Twitter for the latest update. Please continue to send your juicy stories to michaelsylim@fashionpulis.com. Thank you very much for loving Fashion PULIS!

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of Fashion PULIS. The management reserves the right to exclude comments that do not comply with the GUIDELINES in writing comments.

4 comments: