Thursday, June 4, 2020

Tweet Scoop: Vilma Santos on the Anti-Terrorism Bill

Image courtesy of Instagram: rosavilmasantosrecto

Image courtesy of  Twitter: luckymanzano

40 comments:

  1. She's one of the authors. Wag na maghugas kamay. Why author if you have reservations?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Playing safe lagi yan si Ate Vi. Wala paninindigan. Kalowka.

      Delete
    2. 12:24 AM, Sinabi po niya, di siya ang principal author. Kailangan mo na ng prescription glasses.

      Delete
    3. 1:40 Read the bill. She is not the sponsor. She is one of the authors. Kailangan mo, hindi prescription glasses kundi mag research. Don't rely on what she said but what is on the document. Madali tayong lokohin kung hindi tayo mapagmatyag.

      Delete
    4. 5:06 PM, Kailangan mapagmatyag tama ka dyan pero ano ba ang nakalagay sa document para masabi mong niloko niya ang taong bayan? Baka di ka lang marunong bumasa at makaintindi ?

      Delete
  2. yes naman kase vote niya. kahit anong rason, e ang yes or no naman ang binibilang

    ReplyDelete
  3. Janine was spot on.
    Kung with reservations, bakit nagYES. hindi ba dapat NO muna hanggat maayos ung nakikita mong issue/s.

    Pag tamad ka mag-ayos ng batas, wag tumakbong senador at kongresista. Sayang ang pwesto sa inyo.

    ReplyDelete
  4. if you have reservations it's always better to lean on the NO side until you resolve your concerns/ agam-agam.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very true. She is senseless.

      Delete
    2. 7:36 AM, Cong. Vi made sense to me. Nag YES siya dahil mas nakalamang ang positibo nakita niya kaya nga nasabi niya ang kanyang reservation para mabasa ng mga magpapatupat na wag umabuso sa pag enforce nito.

      Delete
  5. ANO NA NANGYARI KAY SISTER STELLA L? KAY AMANDA NG DEKADA 70?? Sana habang pinoportray niya yung mga roles niya nakukuja din niya at nagegets yung mga gustong ipabatid neto

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. May character ba siyang bumabatikos sa mga NPA?

      Delete
  6. still a yes. No matter what the justification is

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes dahil for her mas malaki ang magagawang kabutihan kesa sa nakakasama

      Delete
  7. Pero madam e nag YES kana e. Pano yorrn?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1:47 AM, Paano na kamo kasi nag YES siya that means she expect it to be carried out without abuse that's why she stated her reservations.

      Delete
  8. Those who seems to know better why do you all go out on the street let your voice be heard, let you grievance be felt, just like what Sister Stella L and Amanda of dekada 70 did, do it peaceful so your stand wont be in vain. If I were in the Philippines I will join hands with you guys if can make me realized that your point and reasoning holds water but if you are just voice that cant make sound because you know better maybe a more knowledge of the law and the implementation of such law has to deeply studied the reason for it, the cause of it and the ramifications of it .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sabi ni Lola, mas malalakas ang loob at matatapang ang mga kabataan noong Dekada 70. Ngayon, puro salita lang sa social media dahil walang nakakakita. Mga takot.

      Delete
  9. sana No kung may reservations. naku ate Vi fail sa congress sana nag mayor ka na lang ulit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 2:33 AM, She pass with flying color. She weighed the pros and cons and she realized that the pro on the bill outweighed the cons that's why she voted YES.

      Delete
  10. She pretends not to know that everything in this country is abused by politicians and those in power. Shameless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 2:41 AM, Ang mga gumagawa ng masama lang ang takot, kung wala kang ginagawang masama there's no need to be takot

      Delete
    2. 2:13 kaya nga sinabi ni 2:41 na ABUSED eh. Ibig sabihin, may politician lang na malakas ngayon at ayaw sayo o kalaban mo sa negosyo, aba, kahit naman wala ka ginagawang masama kaya ka bali baligtarin ang pangyayari kasi sila ang nasa power ngayon. don't be too naive na kung wala ginagawa masama wag matakot. I had the same mindset you have noon but looking at what's happening in the country right now, kung sino malakas sa naka upo, sila may upper hand. padrino system sa Pinas. basta ka alyado ka lusot ka.

      Delete
  11. Shut up! You approved it already. Your reservation is meaningless and useless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ikaw ang mag shut up ! Even she voted no mas lamang pa rin ang Yes naiboto ng mga kasamahan niya sa congress dahil alam nila na mas makakabuti ito kesa mas ikakasama

      Delete
  12. Replies
    1. Who? You 7:30 AM is the one who is disgusting.

      Delete
  13. Shameless talaga. She voted for it and then make lame and nonsense excuses afterwards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's so shameless about it? Kung akala niya mas matimbang ang ikakabuti nito basta maisakatuparan ito ng tama at walang pag aabuso

      Delete
  14. Para sa mga npa yan wala ng ginawa kundi magkidnap ng mga bata at gawin terorista.. wala naman problema kung magprotesta kayo wag naman kyo magvandal

    ReplyDelete
  15. yes and no lang ang binibilang sa Kongreso. Hindi half-point ang yes with reservations. Sana nag-no ka na lang.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes para walang sabit. Mabasa pa ni Digong.

      Delete
    2. 12:21 PM, Mas matimbang para kay Cong Vi ang ikakabuti nito kesa ikakasama kaya nag Yes siya at sinabi niya kung ano ang reservation niya para na rin mabasa ito at gawin tama at walang pag aabuso pag pinatutupat ito

      Delete
  16. Well, stand nya yon. Stand mo rin yon.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Its a yes from you

    ReplyDelete
  18. It's a straightforward answer lang. Yes or No. Walang Yes but. .Walang balimbing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1:43 AM, Nag Yes lang balimbing na?

      Delete
  19. 2:00 and with that law in motion, you can and will be tagged.

    ReplyDelete