Bakit lahat na lang kinoconnect sa administration ngayon at press freedom?? Maria Reesa had a case which was filed against her back in 2012, iba pa administration noon, and it was filed by someone not related to our current president i believe. Now that the verdict has been decided by court, bakit attack on press freedom agad?? Dahil ba journalist siya at she's untouchable dapat by the law? Can you please enlighten me?
During the 2nd SONA, PRRD warned Rappler that it will close down. True enough, patong patong na kaso ang hinaharap nila ngayon.
The article in question in the cyberlibel case was posted a few months before the law took effect. The article had a very minor spelling error which was corrected after the law took effect. It was not substantial bec nothing was changed in the article except for the spelling. Pero kailangang ipilit at idiin ang Rappler kaya natuloy ang kaso.
Please ask Karen Davila what press freedom she is talking about. Just because they are in the media they can just express anything without proper responsibility.
1215, supposed crime was committed in May 2012; Cyber crime Prevention Act was signed into law in September 2012; published report where libel was supposedly committed was updated in February 2014. Case was filed in Oct 2017.
The current administration is really a whole circus and full of clowns right now pero tama bang isisi to sa kanila, eh, diba, 2014 pa to? LMAO correct me if I'm wrong or can someone, please, enlighten me about this?
Ano aasahan mo sa mga yan. Lahat yan may galit sa presidente. Hahaha mga anti mga yan.. the truth is kahit sino pang maging presidente may mga pilipinong reklamador meski si yorme o vico pa yan in the future.. kasi likas na sa mga pinoy ang pagiging reklamador. Lol. Smh.
Freedom of the press "cannot be used as a shield" against libel. Magisip din paminsan minsan para hindi tyo nagagamit ng ibang tao na may sariling agendas. 2012 pa yung kaso iba pa yung presidente nun mga klasmeyt. Siniraan mo yung tao ng walang proof tapos pag kinasuhan ka at natalo, kasalanan ng gobyerno? Wow talaga nasan ang comprehension.
2012 na-published ang Rappler article. 2014 na-update ang article dahil sa maling spelling. 2017 nagdemanda ang plaintiff. Sino ba ang presidente noong 2017? Comprehensive dapat ang pag-aaral mo sa topic bago ka kumuda hija.
Totoo naman yon, 2:09. Iba pa naman talaga president nung mga panahon na yon. Atsaka isa pa, libel ang kaso nya tapos tinatapakan daw press freedom nya? LMAO fyi, private person na siniraan nya ang nagkaso sa kanya at hindi ang gov't. Hindi press freedom nya ang tinatapakan kapag kinampihan to kundi ang karapatan ng isang tao na lumaban gamit ang batas.
2012- First publication 2014- Republication because of the typo error 2017- case was filed It took them 3 years to file the case because in between they exhaust efforts to request Rappler to correct their article but it did not happen.
O ngayon yung presidente ba magdedecide ng verdict nya? Hayaan nyo ang Korte Suprema ang magdesisyon kung ano dapat kalagyan ni Ressa. Tigilan nyo na yang kadramahang pagkitil sa press freedom. Lumang kwento na yan.
Bakit press freedom agad? Pano kung wala ngang basehan ang report nila at na.taint ng husto ang reputation nung Keng eh businessman pa mandin. Mali din eh. Feeling kasi ng press mga untouchables sila lagi.
Hindi nyo ba napapansin na pag di pabor sa mga anti ang issue, ang sigaw agad nila ay "democracy is dead" at may paglabag daw agad sa press freedom/freedom of speech. May pattern ang mga hanash nila kaya pakonti ng pakonti na ang naniniwala sa kanila.
Bilib na sana ako kay kakie pero sa post na to naisip ko na she’s just another pa-woke kid. Nakikisakay lang kung san may outrage pero hindi nagiisip kung tama ba talaga or mali.
Nakiusap pala ito si Wilfredo Keng kina Ressa na kung pwede i erase or delete yung article. nagmamatigas smg ressa kala nya untouchable sya . Hoy ressa sisihin mo si Pres. Noynoy sya ang nag signed na maging law yang cyber crime law lol
If they read it, they would be saying something different. Yan ang hirap sa twitterlandia pag dating sa mga political issues, daming nakiki-bandwagon lang to seem intelligent.
youre accusing throngs of intelligent people, including different press outfits, of not reading? baka ikaw? or kulang comprehension? idefend had a discussion yesterday on press freedom and it’s on youtube. try giving it a listen
wala eh, basta maka press freedom is dead lang eh..hindi na importante yung detalye ng kaso. Ganyan kalala ang diperensya sa reading comprehension sa bansa.
Defend press freedom, pero ayan malaya pa rin kayong nakapagsalita. Interview nga agad e. Balik Rapler office ka din after bail. O di ba. Democracy is dead, pero patuloy ka pa rin nakakapagbigay ng saloobin at pag batikos sa gobyernong pilit mong dinidikit sa isyu mo.
nakakahiya ka kakie. New York ka pa naman nag aaral haha kung ano nalang issue pinapatulan d naman inaaral yung issue maka against kang sa current admin. hala bira haha
Nagpa-press conference si Sec. Harry Roque para ihayag na walang kinalaman si Pres. Duterte. Pero bakit may order na isara ang Rappler? Bakit nakademanda ang Rappler tungkol sa PDR? Bakit tinatanggalan ng license ng SEC ang Rappler, at marami pang ibang kaso. Sunod-sunod talaga. Nagkataon lang marahil. Wala namang kinalaman ang gobyerno sabi nila.
Kim pls share your opinion! Who knows? Baka ikayaman mo na naman to or lalo mo ikasikat ulit hahaha. Why stop now? I thought u loved how things turned out last time?
Ressa was given every chance to rectify the situation but she did not retract or edit the article. She did not even let him air his side of the story. She did not testify in court and disrespected the justice system. Justice has been served, but not yet karma. Now that is something Ressa should be afraid of.
2012 nangyari yung article ni Rappler BUT Mr Keng only filed a case against Ressa in 2017 nung nakaupo na si Duterte. 🤔 yung mga in denial na walang kinalaman ang admin na to, hoy gumising naman kayo!!!
She already lost from the start. Hindi kasi uma-attend ng hearing. Tapos ngayon gustong makuha ang simpatya ng masa at isisi ang guilty verdict sa gobyerno.
So happy reading the comments here. Kaya kayong mga artista tinatawag kayong artista "lang." Magbasa-basa naman kayo paminsan-minsan. Wag maki-trending para lang mapansin.
Ano naman ang kinalaman ng press freedom at democracy sa case ni ressa eh private individual naman ang nag file ng case? Sobra sobrang press freedom na nga meron sa pilipinas kahit ano nalang binabalita nila kahit unverified. Gasgas na gasgas na yang press freedom at democracy na yan. Kung yan lagi ang gagamitin nyo para hindi kayo maging accountable sa mga actions and wrong doings nyo, eh para san pa ang batas? Maging anarchy state nalang tayo tutal wala naman gusto sumunod sa batas, gusto lahat malaya gawin ang gustong gawin. Hayst.
pagod nko weekly na lang may issue yung mga artista, ang hilig nyo makisawsaw sa issue and if you ask them they have zero knowledge of the situation, tapos dadanin nyo kme sa kanta a tiktok?!?...i believe freedom of speech still has limits because you are responsible of what you say and write.
The complainant gave them a chance to air his side and change the article kaya natagalan. They were asking clarification from Rappler even before the current admin.
false kasi ung source ay from an intel lang so walang solid basis. kumbaga hearsay. eh mapanira. nung una dinedma ni keng. nung nireprint in 2014, nagrequest si keng na tanggalin kasi di daw totoo ang bad sa reputation niya as bizperson eh di niremove nung aling ressa kaya umabot sa court. and ito na nga. press freedom chuchu daw lol
We are all the same. Once in a while, may rant, post at comment naman tayo sa soc med about mga current issues sa bansa. Ang kaibahan lang, wala masyado tayong followers at di napapansin gaya sa mga artistang ito. They have all the rights to say or express their thoughts.
Bakit lahat na lang kinoconnect sa administration ngayon at press freedom?? Maria Reesa had a case which was filed against her back in 2012, iba pa administration noon, and it was filed by someone not related to our current president i believe. Now that the verdict has been decided by court, bakit attack on press freedom agad?? Dahil ba journalist siya at she's untouchable dapat by the law? Can you please enlighten me?
ReplyDeleteDuring the 2nd SONA, PRRD warned Rappler that it will close down. True enough, patong patong na kaso ang hinaharap nila ngayon.
DeleteThe article in question in the cyberlibel case was posted a few months before the law took effect. The article had a very minor spelling error which was corrected after the law took effect. It was not substantial bec nothing was changed in the article except for the spelling. Pero kailangang ipilit at idiin ang Rappler kaya natuloy ang kaso.
Please ask Karen Davila what press freedom she is talking about. Just because they are in the media they can just express anything without proper responsibility.
Delete1215, supposed crime was committed in May 2012; Cyber crime Prevention Act was signed into law in September 2012; published report where libel was supposedly committed was updated in February 2014. Case was filed in Oct 2017.
DeleteThe fact is that the article was republished in 2014 after the Anti-Cyber Crime Law took effect, 12:53.
DeletePlease lng Klasmyt kimmy panatilihing nkatulala habang nagkakape at bka pagnagsalita ka eh mapalabas ka na ng tuluyan sa klasrum
ReplyDeleteJusko Kim Chiu meron ka pang pa-I want to say more but... Just stop!
ReplyDeleteGood job on staying silent kimmy! We dont want another corny song lol
ReplyDeleteHa? Hahahahaha bwisit ka baks! Hahaha
DeleteNag uumpisa na naman itong si Kim chiu. Tama na uy!
ReplyDeleteGusto kong marinig ang opinion ni Classmate Kim about this issue. I'm sure it will be another hit song for her haha...
ReplyDeleteDemocracy without discipline is worst than authoritarianism. Libel is different from press freedom.
ReplyDeleteWhat is your point hija?
Delete12:32 AGREE
DeleteThe current administration is really a whole circus and full of clowns right now pero tama bang isisi to sa kanila, eh, diba, 2014 pa to? LMAO correct me if I'm wrong or can someone, please, enlighten me about this?
ReplyDelete2012 pa Yan
DeleteAno aasahan mo sa mga yan. Lahat yan may galit sa presidente. Hahaha mga anti mga yan.. the truth is kahit sino pang maging presidente may mga pilipinong reklamador meski si yorme o vico pa yan in the future.. kasi likas na sa mga pinoy ang pagiging reklamador. Lol. Smh.
DeleteSaang kweba ka ba naninirahan? Magbasa ka.
Delete2012 yung artcle. 2017 nafile yung kaso.
DeleteFreedom of the press "cannot be used as a shield" against libel. Magisip din paminsan minsan para hindi tyo nagagamit ng ibang tao na may sariling agendas. 2012 pa yung kaso iba pa yung presidente nun mga klasmeyt. Siniraan mo yung tao ng walang proof tapos pag kinasuhan ka at natalo, kasalanan ng gobyerno? Wow talaga nasan ang comprehension.
ReplyDeleteYan nanaman tayo sa iba pa ang presidente nun. Jusko huh
DeleteMaiinis ka talaga sa kadramahan nila. The press should be held accountable din naman sa mga misinformed and unreliable news nila.
Delete@2:09 kasi nga lagi kinokonek sa current admin!
Delete2:29 - so ano po ang kinalaman ng president ngayon sa decision sa kaso?
Delete2012 na-published ang Rappler article. 2014 na-update ang article dahil sa maling spelling. 2017 nagdemanda ang plaintiff. Sino ba ang presidente noong 2017? Comprehensive dapat ang pag-aaral mo sa topic bago ka kumuda hija.
DeleteThe Rappler article came out in 2012 but the case was only filed in 2017, after Duterte became president. Sino ang walang reading comprehension?
DeleteTotoo naman yon, 2:09. Iba pa naman talaga president nung mga panahon na yon. Atsaka isa pa, libel ang kaso nya tapos tinatapakan daw press freedom nya? LMAO fyi, private person na siniraan nya ang nagkaso sa kanya at hindi ang gov't. Hindi press freedom nya ang tinatapakan kapag kinampihan to kundi ang karapatan ng isang tao na lumaban gamit ang batas.
Delete2012- First publication
Delete2014- Republication because of the typo error
2017- case was filed
It took them 3 years to file the case because in between they exhaust efforts to request Rappler to correct their article but it did not happen.
O ngayon yung presidente ba magdedecide ng verdict nya? Hayaan nyo ang Korte Suprema ang magdesisyon kung ano dapat kalagyan ni Ressa. Tigilan nyo na yang kadramahang pagkitil sa press freedom. Lumang kwento na yan.
DeleteAn important case for the world to watch - bianca,talaga ba te? I cannot... ah ewan ko sa yo bianca..
ReplyDeleteBakit press freedom agad? Pano kung wala ngang basehan ang report nila at na.taint ng husto ang reputation nung Keng eh businessman pa mandin.
ReplyDeleteMali din eh. Feeling kasi ng press mga untouchables sila lagi.
totoo! press freedom ba ang magdungis ng reputasyon ng ibang tao ng wala namang matibay na ebedensya? more on abuse of press freedom kamo
DeleteHindi nyo ba napapansin na pag di pabor sa mga anti ang issue, ang sigaw agad nila ay "democracy is dead" at may paglabag daw agad sa press freedom/freedom of speech. May pattern ang mga hanash nila kaya pakonti ng pakonti na ang naniniwala sa kanila.
DeleteBilib na sana ako kay kakie pero sa post na to naisip ko na she’s just another pa-woke kid. Nakikisakay lang kung san may outrage pero hindi nagiisip kung tama ba talaga or mali.
ReplyDeleteParang tayo sawsawera. Di ka nga lang celebrity
DeleteWala naman nakakabilib dyan sa batang yan.. mema.. memaingakngak lang
DeleteAt alam din ni 12:52 kung ano ang tama at mali, 2:10.
DeleteSana naman yung mga taong to, ayos-ayusin ang mga ipinopost. Mawawalan sila ng credibility nyan eh.
ReplyDeleteNakiusap pala ito si Wilfredo Keng kina Ressa na kung pwede i erase or delete yung article. nagmamatigas smg ressa kala nya untouchable sya . Hoy ressa sisihin mo si Pres. Noynoy sya ang nag signed na maging law yang cyber crime law lol
ReplyDeletenagbasa ba itong mga ito kung ano talaga ang kaso?
ReplyDeleteIf they read it, they would be saying something different. Yan ang hirap sa twitterlandia pag dating sa mga political issues, daming nakiki-bandwagon lang to seem intelligent.
Deleteyoure accusing throngs of intelligent people, including different press outfits, of not reading? baka ikaw? or kulang comprehension? idefend had a discussion yesterday on press freedom and it’s on youtube. try giving it a listen
Deletewala eh, basta maka press freedom is dead lang eh..hindi na importante yung detalye ng kaso. Ganyan kalala ang diperensya sa reading comprehension sa bansa.
DeleteDefend press freedom, pero ayan malaya pa rin kayong nakapagsalita. Interview nga agad e. Balik Rapler office ka din after bail. O di ba. Democracy is dead, pero patuloy ka pa rin nakakapagbigay ng saloobin at pag batikos sa gobyernong pilit mong dinidikit sa isyu mo.
ReplyDeleteHija, 8 criminal cases ang demanda sa kanya ng gobyerno. Hindi nya pilit na dinidikit ang sarili nya sa gobyerno. Guniguni mo lang yon. lol
Deletemayayabang press, jusmio basahin sana nila decision. wag lagi i connect sa Pres.
Deletenakakahiya ka kakie. New York ka pa naman nag aaral haha kung ano nalang issue pinapatulan d naman inaaral yung issue maka against kang sa current admin. hala bira haha
ReplyDeleteGigil ako sa'yo eh... She has the "RIGHT" to air her voice out!! At least si Kakie di lang panay kaartehan at tiktok ang ginagawa!!!
DeleteMas nakakahiya ka. Walang masamang patulan ang issue lalo na kapag nakikita mo ay MALI.
Delete8:8 tignan mo mastroke ka sa sobrang gigil mo
DeleteKimmy keep quiet na baka ikaw pa ma cyber libel, I love you pa naman!
ReplyDeletequestion Anu connect ng administration sa Kaso ni Ressa ngayon na she was convicted? Meron ba?
ReplyDeleteWala. The case was filed by a businessman years ago. They're barking up the wrong tree lol
DeleteNagpa-press conference si Sec. Harry Roque para ihayag na walang kinalaman si Pres. Duterte. Pero bakit may order na isara ang Rappler? Bakit nakademanda ang Rappler tungkol sa PDR? Bakit tinatanggalan ng license ng SEC ang Rappler, at marami pang ibang kaso. Sunod-sunod talaga. Nagkataon lang marahil. Wala namang kinalaman ang gobyerno sabi nila.
DeleteRappler was warned by Duterte during the SONA. After that, patong patong na kaso na ang hinarap ni Rappler at Ressa.
Delete1257 may violations na nakita
Delete12.57 since found guilty si ressa na head ng rappler, rapplers franchice is also affected kasi may mga provision dun na nilabag ng rappler thru ressa.
DeleteKim pls share your opinion! Who knows? Baka ikayaman mo na naman to or lalo mo ikasikat ulit hahaha. Why stop now? I thought u loved how things turned out last time?
ReplyDeleteRessa was given every chance to rectify the situation but she did not retract or edit the article. She did not even let him air his side of the story. She did not testify in court and disrespected the justice system. Justice has been served, but not yet karma. Now that is something Ressa should be afraid of.
ReplyDeletetrue yan. feeling untouchable si Ressa. di umattend ng mga hearings. buti nga yan. panay press release tapos press freedom kuda
Delete2012 nangyari yung article ni Rappler BUT Mr Keng only filed a case against Ressa in 2017 nung nakaupo na si Duterte. 🤔 yung mga in denial na walang kinalaman ang admin na to, hoy gumising naman kayo!!!
ReplyDeletei want to hear kimmy's takeaway on this. Speak up girl.
ReplyDeleteEto nman si Frankie pabibo.
ReplyDeleteShe already lost from the start. Hindi kasi uma-attend ng hearing. Tapos ngayon gustong makuha ang simpatya ng masa at isisi ang guilty verdict sa gobyerno.
ReplyDeletekorek
DeleteAlam kasi ng mga bashers na mapapahiya sila pag nagsalita na si kim. Masyadong malawak mag isip si kim kaya madaming apekteed! Napaka intelihente nya.
ReplyDeleteSo happy reading the comments here. Kaya kayong mga artista tinatawag kayong artista "lang." Magbasa-basa naman kayo paminsan-minsan. Wag maki-trending para lang mapansin.
ReplyDeleteAno naman ang kinalaman ng press freedom at democracy sa case ni ressa eh private individual naman ang nag file ng case? Sobra sobrang press freedom na nga meron sa pilipinas kahit ano nalang binabalita nila kahit unverified. Gasgas na gasgas na yang press freedom at democracy na yan. Kung yan lagi ang gagamitin nyo para hindi kayo maging accountable sa mga actions and wrong doings nyo, eh para san pa ang batas? Maging anarchy state nalang tayo tutal wala naman gusto sumunod sa batas, gusto lahat malaya gawin ang gustong gawin. Hayst.
ReplyDeletefeeling nila ang dami nilamg sympathy from netizens.
Deletekonti lang kasi alam nila pero andaming satsat lol
DeleteEnjoying my coffee while watching these pawoke celebrities barking at the wrong tree. God.
ReplyDeletepagod nko weekly na lang may issue yung mga artista, ang hilig nyo makisawsaw sa issue and if you ask them they have zero knowledge of the situation, tapos dadanin nyo kme sa kanta a tiktok?!?...i believe freedom of speech still has limits because you are responsible of what you say and write.
ReplyDeleteKnow it all na naman ang mga “celebrities” na ito. Aral muna bago kuda
ReplyDelete2012 ang article, 2017 nagfile ng case. Yan ang hinahanap nyong connect.
ReplyDeletenakalimutan mo nireprint ung article 2014
DeleteThe complainant gave them a chance to air his side and change the article kaya natagalan. They were asking clarification from Rappler even before the current admin.
DeleteBasahin kasi muna ang buong Decision ng court para hindi yung salita lang ng salita.
ReplyDeleteKim is making comments just for clout
ReplyDeleteGanyan naman tayo lagi gobyerno may kasalanan. Sana magisip naman kayo.
ReplyDeletePaki explain lang mga klasmeyts. True or false ba yung Rappler article nila kay Keng?
ReplyDeleteFalse
Deletefalse kasi ung source ay from an intel lang so walang solid basis. kumbaga hearsay. eh mapanira. nung una dinedma ni keng. nung nireprint in 2014, nagrequest si keng na tanggalin kasi di daw totoo ang bad sa reputation niya as bizperson eh di niremove nung aling ressa kaya umabot sa court. and ito na nga. press freedom chuchu daw lol
DeleteDeserve nya yan, buti nakahanap ka rin ng katapat!
ReplyDeleteI want to hear what Kim has to say.
ReplyDeleteEto na naman yung mga celebrities na akala mo ang gagaling.
ReplyDeletemay magaling naman pero hindi maiingay tulad nila. lata
DeleteWhy so slow 7:59?
ReplyDeletetutal dual citizen naman yang si Maria, bakit hindi na lang siya mag abroad at doon manirahan.
ReplyDeletehinihintay ko ang opinion ni Kim
ReplyDeleteNaku Kim im sure labo labo na naman thoughts mo so keep your mouth sealed na lang
ReplyDeleteWe are all the same. Once in a while, may rant, post at comment naman tayo sa soc med about mga current issues sa bansa. Ang kaibahan lang, wala masyado tayong followers at di napapansin gaya sa mga artistang ito. They have all the rights to say or express their thoughts.
ReplyDeleteItong Bianca nato laging may sinsabi. Nangangayayat ka na kakaepal mo. Dami mong alam girl.
ReplyDelete