Kaya nga e. Panay sabi pa ng "fake" as if siya yung naagrabyado when she was aware of this account and even profited from it. The fact that this went on for so long means she practically gave her blessing for her name to be used. Manahimik na lang sana cya. Shameless.
akala ko talaga si Ethel yun kaya finollow ko, medyo kadisappoint na di pala siya yun. Pero ang asa akin lang, walang karapatan magreklamo yung troll kung naagawan siya ng credits because its her/his choice dahil wala naman siyang sariling identity. Given na yung sa una pa lang sinabi na niya dun daw sa BIO na parody lang yun, but still gumamit pa rin siya ng ibang identity. Dapat sa una pa lang, sinabi na niya kung sino talaga siya para yung credit, kanya talaga.
Di naman siya nagreklamo. In fact, the person behind the account was allowing Ethel to take credit for the account. It was Ethel who publicly instigated the feud. Charot was willing to let Ethel benefit from the fruits of the “fake” Booba’s wit.
Lol aminin di naman sisikat yung parody account kung di sya nagpretend as Ethel. Isa lang syang irrelevant twitter woke, palibhasa gusto lang sumikat kaya mega tago behind somebody’s persona.
It goes both ways. Aminin m sumikat DIN ULIT c ethel ng dhil s witty remarks ni charotism/fake ethel. Nanalo p sya s tawag ng tahanan, nagkaron ng book, at mga guestings s mall at tv. In short pinagkakitaan din ni ethel yn c witty charotism. Buti sna kung may percentage syang nkuha s pera kso wala.
well suck it up charotism. At the end of the day si Ethel pa rin nanalo dito dahil sya nakinabang. Kung gusto mo sumikat do it using your own profile di yung tatago ka behind Ethel. Nakikihiram ka lang at anytime me karapatan si ethel bawiin yan sa iyo. I Don’t even like Ethel but I find these twitter woke accounts even more hilarious, charot!
Bakit galit ka? Di naman siya yung nang-away. He set up a parody account. Ethel claimed it. Profited from it. Charot was not complaining. It was Ethel who thrashed him publicly. If he is defending himself now, tama lang yun. Pinakinabangan na nga siya, inaaway pa.
Kung gagamit ka ng pagkatao ng iba make sure naman na yung pinaglalaban mo hindi salungat sa paniniwala ng totoong account. Parody ka diba so ikaw ang mag adjust. Kahit saang anggulo sumikat pa rin dahil nakapangalan kay ethel
No. Sumikat ang account dahil sa witty tweets, not because of the name Ethel. Kung kay Ethel lang, it would have been just another celebrity twitter account.
Ethel is on the winning side legally speaking. Sure nakinabang sya during its heydays pero nakinabang din si parody account with obvious support from the anti-admin.
9:03 sure ka? Kasi I followed the Parody account too during its early days and yes, it says on the bio na PARODY sya. Ethel CLAIMED on national television that the account was hers, so legally speaking? We all know she's not going to win.
Kahit ano pa evidence na ilabas, Real Ethel claimed the twitter account - and she even published a book about the twits in her name. HAPPY. Tapos ngayon mag-ngangawa sya. CHAROT.
Lol. Ethel, alam mo... Nakinabang ka naman. Between the 2 of you, mas ikaw ang nakinabang. Narevive mo career mo, nagkalibro ka, nanalo ka sa TnT... All because of that account. Tapos sabihin mo fake yun. Eh fake ka rin naman kasi you claimed it as yours, hindi naman pala. Manahimik ka na lang at bumalik sa lungga mo na pinanggalingan nung panahong di ka pa napapasikat uli nung twitter acct na yan
Given naman na nakinabang si ethel e pero prior na i-disown nya ung account winarningan na nya na wag mag engage sa politics pero di nakikinig ang admin. Kayo man ang gamitin ang pangalan na taliwas sa paniniwala nyo, ano gagawin nyo? For sure, di magkakabukuhan kung naging maayos lang din ang admin.
Kaloka. Dun sumikat yung account. Nung on the rise pa, sakay na sakay si Ethel. Minention nga niya si Mocha on national tv. Ngayon lang siya biglang kumambyo. Kasalanan din niya yun, she claimed it as her own eh parody account naman yan before.
Parang troll ang sagutan nung real Ethel. Reading comprehension lagi ang rebuttal e parang sya yung di nagbabasa.
ReplyDeleteNagmukhang troll un real account
DeleteSayang Ethel. Sayang.
DeleteOk. Next.
Si Ethel ang nakinabang sa parody account. Kung umasta parang si charot ang nanloko.
ReplyDeleteKaya nga e. Panay sabi pa ng "fake" as if siya yung naagrabyado when she was aware of this account and even profited from it. The fact that this went on for so long means she practically gave her blessing for her name to be used. Manahimik na lang sana cya. Shameless.
DeleteSumakit ulo ko ah
ReplyDeleteIt shows talaga na senseless si ethel booba noh?
ReplyDeleteakala ko talaga si Ethel yun kaya finollow ko, medyo kadisappoint na di pala siya yun. Pero ang asa akin lang, walang karapatan magreklamo yung troll kung naagawan siya ng credits because its her/his choice dahil wala naman siyang sariling identity. Given na yung sa una pa lang sinabi na niya dun daw sa BIO na parody lang yun, but still gumamit pa rin siya ng ibang identity. Dapat sa una pa lang, sinabi na niya kung sino talaga siya para yung credit, kanya talaga.
ReplyDeleteDi naman siya nagreklamo. In fact, the person behind the account was allowing Ethel to take credit for the account. It was Ethel who publicly instigated the feud. Charot was willing to let Ethel benefit from the fruits of the “fake” Booba’s wit.
DeleteLol aminin di naman sisikat yung parody account kung di sya nagpretend as Ethel. Isa lang syang irrelevant twitter woke, palibhasa gusto lang sumikat kaya mega tago behind somebody’s persona.
ReplyDeleteIt goes both ways. Aminin m sumikat DIN ULIT c ethel ng dhil s witty remarks ni charotism/fake ethel. Nanalo p sya s tawag ng tahanan, nagkaron ng book, at mga guestings s mall at tv. In short pinagkakitaan din ni ethel yn c witty charotism. Buti sna kung may percentage syang nkuha s pera kso wala.
Delete1:56, true yan. Kung may mas nakinabang sa kanila si Ethel yun. Ni isang kusing walang nakuha si Charotism.
DeleteNatawa ako sa "HAPPY" sa dulo ng tweet ni Booba. TH maging "CHAROT"..
ReplyDeleteCorrect. Masyadong forced.
Deleteyung unang basa ko ok naman. nung paulit ulit na cringey haha ew stop it ethel di bagay
DeleteThe parody account is much more brainy than the real Ethel
ReplyDeleteAng gulo sumagot ng real Ethel. Pagkatapos nyang pakinabangan eto sya ngayon, dada ng dada ng nonsense.
ReplyDeleteHalatang si Ethel na yan, ang babaw ng mga sagot at ang sabaw
ReplyDeleteang cringe ng "happy"
ReplyDeleteIs it just me or yumabang ang totoong tao behind this account? Parang he/she looks highly of him/herself.
ReplyDeleteJust you.
DeleteTruth. Entitled na ang parody account. Yan ang mahirap sa twitter madali maggawa ng account, madali din makapanira.
DeleteStop trying to make “happy” happen, it’s not going to happen. Lol
ReplyDeletewell suck it up charotism. At the end of the day si Ethel pa rin nanalo dito dahil sya nakinabang. Kung gusto mo sumikat do it using your own profile di yung tatago ka behind Ethel. Nakikihiram ka lang at anytime me karapatan si ethel bawiin yan sa iyo. I Don’t even like Ethel but I find these twitter woke accounts even more hilarious, charot!
ReplyDeleteBakit galit ka? Di naman siya yung nang-away. He set up a parody account. Ethel claimed it. Profited from it. Charot was not complaining. It was Ethel who thrashed him publicly. If he is defending himself now, tama lang yun. Pinakinabangan na nga siya, inaaway pa.
DeleteKung gagamit ka ng pagkatao ng iba make sure naman na yung pinaglalaban mo hindi salungat sa paniniwala ng totoong account. Parody ka diba so ikaw ang mag adjust. Kahit saang anggulo sumikat pa rin dahil nakapangalan kay ethel
ReplyDeleteNo. Sumikat ang account dahil sa witty tweets, not because of the name Ethel. Kung kay Ethel lang, it would have been just another celebrity twitter account.
Deleteexactly my thought
DeleteEthel is on the winning side legally speaking. Sure nakinabang sya during its heydays pero nakinabang din si parody account with obvious support from the anti-admin.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you mean legally? The parody is anti-admin. It follows that he/she will be get support from anti-admin. What's wrong with that?
Delete9:03 sure ka? Kasi I followed the Parody account too during its early days and yes, it says on the bio na PARODY sya. Ethel CLAIMED on national television that the account was hers, so legally speaking? We all know she's not going to win.
DeleteAko lang ba ang nairita sa "happy"?
ReplyDeleteako din! di happy sa happy. walang dating. charot pa rin!
DeleteAko din.
DeleteDami nang ebidensya (screenshots ng mga text messages) na nilabas ni Ethel, pero si Charotera walang mailabas.
ReplyDeleteEthel, don't try to make "happy" happen. It's never gonna happen!
ReplyDeleteyumabang yung parody ni ethel. masyado na maangas sumagot.
ReplyDeleteKahit ano pa evidence na ilabas, Real Ethel claimed the twitter account - and she even published a book about the twits in her name. HAPPY. Tapos ngayon mag-ngangawa sya. CHAROT.
ReplyDeleteLol. Ethel, alam mo... Nakinabang ka naman. Between the 2 of you, mas ikaw ang nakinabang. Narevive mo career mo, nagkalibro ka, nanalo ka sa TnT... All because of that account. Tapos sabihin mo fake yun. Eh fake ka rin naman kasi you claimed it as yours, hindi naman pala. Manahimik ka na lang at bumalik sa lungga mo na pinanggalingan nung panahong di ka pa napapasikat uli nung twitter acct na yan
ReplyDeleteGiven naman na nakinabang si ethel e pero prior na i-disown nya ung account winarningan na nya na wag mag engage sa politics pero di nakikinig ang admin. Kayo man ang gamitin ang pangalan na taliwas sa paniniwala nyo, ano gagawin nyo? For sure, di magkakabukuhan kung naging maayos lang din ang admin.
ReplyDeleteKaloka. Dun sumikat yung account. Nung on the rise pa, sakay na sakay si Ethel. Minention nga niya si Mocha on national tv. Ngayon lang siya biglang kumambyo. Kasalanan din niya yun, she claimed it as her own eh parody account naman yan before.
DeleteHuwag ipilit ang happy. Parang shunga lang.
Delete2:31pm hindi pinipilit ang happy. Laliman mo pag iisip
ReplyDeleteGosh Ethel, PLEASE stop making happy happen. it sounds really pathetic.
ReplyDelete