Images courtesy of Instagram: cesdrilon and iammarielozano
Source: www.dzrhnews.com.ph
TV personalities Ces Drilon, Marie Lozano and other members of ABS-CBN News and Current Affairs are facing arrest over the libel complaint filed by Gretchen Fullido for allegedly damaging her reputation.
The resolution, signed on April 29 by Quezon City Chief Prosecutor Vilma Barcellano, reverted the earlier dismissal of Fullido’s complaint. It stated that Fullido’s complaint against broadcast journalist Cecilia ‘Ces’ Drilon, showbiz news reporter Marie Lozano, and news executive Venancio Borromeo have a solid basis.
On March, QC Prosecutors had dismissed Fullido’s complaint saying that the statements of Drilon and Lozano are not libelous and ‘fall within the category of a conditionally or qualifiedly privileged communication.’
After seeing a probable cause on the complaint, the chief prosecutor recommended releasing a warrant of arrest against the three involved personalities.
Fullido sued Drilon, Lozano, and ABS-CBN executive Venancio Borromeo for libel for allegedly damaging her reputation by saying she filed sexual harassment complaints to leverage her employment status at the network.
Drilon said Fullido’s allegations against her were “unthinkable.” Meanwhile, ABS-CBN management dismissed the sexual harassment case, but held Favila liable for gross misconduct, leading to her dismissal.
Talaga???akala ko noon dismiss nila ang complain ni gretchen
ReplyDeleteGretchen's camp filed a motion for reconsideration last month.
DeleteWell the decision was reversed. Congrats to Gretchen!
DeleteHuwaw! Sino ang mabigat na Padrino? Dinismiss na nung mga naunang prosecutor tapos now yung Chief Prosecutor na ang bumabangka?! Anong kalokohan yan!?? Hindi man lang nagcoconvene mga prosecutors para magkaron ng isang legitimate decision???!
Delete@12:54 kaya nga ho "reverted"..binalikan po.
DeleteAs said in the article, reverted ang decision ng chief prosecutor. They probably moved to reconsider the dismissal of the complaint with more or clear evidence this time.
Delete1:06 mag-aral ka ng batas ha. Wag kuda ng kuda. Ano yang magconvene para may isang legitimate decision? May presumption of regularity ang actions nila kaya walang kinalalagyan ang term mong legitimate. Walang iisang decision yan kaya nga may right to escalate or appeal ang mga tao. Please study law ha before ka magkukuda dyan.
DeleteNever liked Gretchen but im totally with her in this! Go girl!
Deletekung may sasabihin ka saibang tao. make sure na hindi nila malalaman.
Delete7:12 ang galing mo eh noh! Ang saya ng justice system natin di ba? Kung nasasakdal ka o nagrereklamo ka Walang kasiguraduhan kahit alam mong inosente ka dahil jan sa presumption of regularity ng mga individual actions ng mga kinauukulan. Galing mo!
Delete4:18 okay so bkit galit ka kay 7:12 sya ba gumagawa ng batas? Nagpaliwanag lang tao. Dapat nga matuwa ka pwedeng maparusahan mga bully!
Delete9:31 di ba galit din ang dating ni 7:12? Sana direktang explain na lang para sa lahat sya na law student di ba?
Delete2:14 lol bakit galit na galit ka na kinorrect si 7:12? Tingin ko ay hindi naman kailangan maglecture nyan dito kasi yung mga punto lang ni 7:12 ang sinagot. Saka si 7:12 yung parang hindi naman humihingi ng lecture dahil may hatol na sya agad. Padrino system daw. Kalokohan daw kasi Chief Prosec na bumabangka. Don't sweat it law student. Napagbuntunan ka ng wala sa kinalalagyan lol.
DeleteLakas din ng sikmura ni Gretchen.
ReplyDeleteNasa tama naman kasi siya
Delete@12:58 was it Good or Bad ??..
DeleteMali ba intindi mo?
DeleteTibay ng dibdib ang right term.....
DeleteGo ng masampulan lalo na si Cez
ReplyDeletekaren davila grabs popcorn
Delete3:16 why would she?
DeleteSana lhat ng bully sa mundo makulong.
DeleteWarrant of Arrest? Grabe naman. I don’t think it should come to that
ReplyDeleteBailable ang kaso.
DeleteDura lex sed lex. The law doesn't care about your feelings.
DeleteNo warrant yet. The court will also determine the existence of probable cause for the purpose of the issuance of the warrant.
DeleteSiguro dapat lang na dinggin ulit ang kaso pag talo pa rin si Gretchen, at least she tried her best
ReplyDeleteSiguro totoo nga ito.... gumagatos talaga si mama Gretchen mahal mahal kaya mag pa kaso.... plus nakaka stress pa. Hinde naman siya lalaban ng ganito kung hinde siya hinarass... well sa akin opinion lang naman.
ReplyDeleteI believe this too
DeleteMuka nga
DeleteSige napuno na cya
Delete...
It's bailable though.
ReplyDeleteMay record pa din sila + tarnished reputation.
Delete4:35 itatanong q p lng sana kng ano mangyayari if ever bailable na man ung kaso, thank u at nasagot mo.
DeleteLeksyon yan para sa mga "medyo" powertripping, bully, chismosa or whatever sa workplace. Lalo na sa mema di naman alam whole story!
ReplyDeleteMarie does look like a member of mean girls. Lol
Deletei agree in general. struggle na nga ang mga babae sa workplace (like may tendency na mas mataas pa rin sweldo ng mga lalaki kahit magkalevel lang kayo etc), dapat support system natin ang isat isa as much as possible.
DeleteHay. I agree. Tayong mga babae ang dapat nagtutulung-tulungan pero madalas tayo pa nagpopropagate ng workplace bullying.
DeleteSana di bailable pra kulong tlga. Yun lng.
ReplyDeleteSana nga pero you think papayag makulong si cess and that Marie Lozano girl? Hinde yan. Bail agad mga yan hinde NIla kya makulong.
Deletemay merit but it didn't say if the merits are strong. now it's time for the defendants' lawyers to work. appearance fee pa lang tiba tiba na sila lol
ReplyDeleteBut.... it’s friday today! Kung ma-arrest sila today sa Monday pa ang labas nila. Ohh.. and it’s holiday on Monday too
ReplyDeleteHanep..Ang daming Lawyer dito..mga pinoy talaga ang TATALINO..dati Google doctor lang ngayon may Google lawyer na rin ..hahahaha
ReplyDeleteok nga mga classmates, forum for discussion talaga. thanks FP !
Deleteyan ang pinunta ng second year law professor namin.
Delete"the most stupid thing youll ever here, is that law is limited and exclusive to us lawyers. that ordinary people cannot or should not put in or share their opinion about the law."
3:10 here
Delete*pinunto
These "empowered" women should abstain from doing news report until the whole case will be dismissed/ have a verdict.
ReplyDeleteang sabi ni Cez, she might be imprisoned for merely participating in an official procreeding called upon by their company.
ReplyDeletesorry to break this to you, participating in a proceeding whether testifying voluntarily or as called for or obliged by a company, does not correspond to immunity. you will face and you have to face any actions taken against you in response to what you did or what you said within permitted legal proceedings
if what you say is not true, the subject of your statement may question you back and challenge you legally.
every action corresponds to a specific accountability.
even the president's immunity is only limited to his term of office only