I did not see anything on the documents that Falcis is going to be charged to support the letter from her lawyers. What is going on? Took the time to add music for dramatic effect - one screen shot will suffice. Substance over cosmetics/ drama please Kris.
Looks like mali yung qualified theft na kaso kaya na aquit, ito may grounds yung estafa at credit card fraud because as it turns out the card was company issued.
12:24 Magkaiba nga. Pero di ba 44 counts of qualified theft nga ang demanda? Bakit bigla may estafa at RA 8484? Hindi naman yata pwede palitan kung ano ang finile na demanda.
Eh hndi nga nag file ng estafa case is madam! Kung nag file sya, eh di sana nabigyan ng pagkakataon si nicko para sumagot? Kaya paano nagkaroon ng estafa case? Ksma ba yun sa reklamo ni kris? Eh alam natin lahat qualified theft lang?
Papano magkakaron ng probable cause ang kasong hindi naman sinampa ng complainant? Qualified theft lang ang ikinaso di ba? Pwede ba na ang OCP ang magre-rekomenda kung anong kaso ang dapat isampa? Parang di yata tama.
I think yung kinaso naman sa kanya is not the business charges but the personal charges kaya nga nakita ng court na may probable cause of fraud kasi siya mismo nagpadala ng check to pay for those expenses. And I think the court takes this as an evidence on the admission of guilt. I really hope somethig comes out of this case. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. This is not an unusual case. I’ve encountered similar cases before while I was still working in the Philippines. Masyadong naaabuso ang use of corporate issued cards. It’s high time that people be educated about ethics.
1:02 question: pano mapatutunayan n kris n inabuso ni nicko yun credit card kung sa knya nkapangalan yun? Pwede nmn nya bayaran yun. Not unless c kris ang ngbabayad ng card
I did not see anything on the documents that Falcis is going to be charged to support the letter from her lawyers. What is going on? Took the time to add music for dramatic effect - one screen shot will suffice. Substance over cosmetics/ drama please Kris.
ReplyDeleteThe words “credit card” itself......eh?
ReplyDeleteCongrats, Krissy! I always believe you're telling the truth. God is good🙏
ReplyDeleteSyan na naman yang 'truth' na yan, as claimed also of the other camp. Who's telling the TRUTH ba talaga?
ReplyDeleteLooks like mali yung qualified theft na kaso kaya na aquit, ito may grounds yung estafa at credit card fraud because as it turns out the card was company issued.
DeleteMagkaiba kasi Qualified Theft sa Estafa.
Delete12:24 Magkaiba nga. Pero di ba 44 counts of qualified theft nga ang demanda? Bakit bigla may estafa at RA 8484? Hindi naman yata pwede palitan kung ano ang finile na demanda.
Delete1:14, may probable cause sa estafa kaya ibig sabihin baka may demanda ng estafa.
DeleteEh hndi nga nag file ng estafa case is madam! Kung nag file sya, eh di sana nabigyan ng pagkakataon si nicko para sumagot? Kaya paano nagkaroon ng estafa case? Ksma ba yun sa reklamo ni kris? Eh alam natin lahat qualified theft lang?
DeleteBakit di binanggit na dismissed ang kasong qualified theft against Nicko?
ReplyDeleteBakit? Did they mention anything nung na-dismiss yung ibang cases? Siyempre yung good news lang ang ipo-post nila. Bahala na si Falcis sa iba. LOL.
DeleteNOT HER GOOD NEWS TO TELL, IKAW NAMAN.
DeleteSYMPRE KANYA KANYANG ANNOUNCE NG GOOD NEWS NILA.
Yong qualified theft na dismissed pero ang estafa and credit card fraud may probable cause.
ReplyDeletePero wala yatang demandang estafa ni-file si Kris. Ang korte yata ang nag-recommend ng ganun?
DeleteSana yung mismong resolution ng Taguig OCP ang pinost.
ReplyDeleteBaka this time hindi pwede kasi may kaso na talaga.
Deletetrue
Delete12:34 panong may kaso e wala nga daw kaso ng estafa na ni-file?
Deletewhile nicko is posting on social media, in a separate interview his lawyer says "this is an unjust ruling" and vows to appeal the decision LOL
ReplyDeleteESTAFA AND CREDIT CARD FRAUD ang kaso
ReplyDeleteang na dismissed is QUALIFIED THEFT
Haha! May something nga!
DeletePapano magkakaron ng probable cause ang kasong hindi naman sinampa ng complainant? Qualified theft lang ang ikinaso di ba? Pwede ba na ang OCP ang magre-rekomenda kung anong kaso ang dapat isampa? Parang di yata tama.
DeleteParang it's "your word against mine" na yata ang nagaganap.
ReplyDeleteKung estafa at cc fraud and kaso. Madali lang ma counter yun lalo na yung may evidence.
ReplyDeleteIyan eh kong may evidence ba maipapakita ang mga Falcis.
DeleteFrom the beginning, Nicko already seems guilty.
ReplyDeleteyumaman mga attorney nila .
ReplyDeletec kris tlga un tipo na pag sinabing tatahimik sya e good for 24hrs lang yon silence na yon, lol
ReplyDeleteIf the Falcis camp can prove that all charges in the credit card are authorized, then it is NOT FRAUD.
ReplyDeleteAng estafa yata is misappropriation of funds. Kailangan patunayan niya na lahat ng expenses niya is company related.
DeleteI think yung kinaso naman sa kanya is not the business charges but the personal charges kaya nga nakita ng court na may probable cause of fraud kasi siya mismo nagpadala ng check to pay for those expenses. And I think the court takes this as an evidence on the admission of guilt.
DeleteI really hope somethig comes out of this case. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. This is not an unusual case. I’ve encountered similar cases before while I was still working in the Philippines. Masyadong naaabuso ang use of corporate issued cards. It’s high time that people be educated about ethics.
1:02 question: pano mapatutunayan n kris n inabuso ni nicko yun credit card kung sa knya nkapangalan yun? Pwede nmn nya bayaran yun. Not unless c kris ang ngbabayad ng card
DeleteI still believe Nicko.
ReplyDelete