Sorry but I don't believe Gretchen's story. Siya itong mahilig maginvite, she was the one na dumikit kay Favila and Asprec. Why would someone who felt violated for 3 yrs, 3 yrs, invite to go on nights out na sila lang dalawa, yung offender nya?
Anon 1:29 exactly why invite your supposedly "offender" kung you felt vuolated andaming loophole ng mga evidences ni Gretchen. Sana nga walang trial by public na mangyari
You can be a battered wife and still bear a child with your offender. Gretchen was doing her best to keep her job and that includes nurturing relationships with her bosses and colleagues. Hindi porke’t naginvite ka ng dinner eh wala ng inappropriate actions against you yung mga taong involved. Minsan nga pinapalampas mo nalang para hindi mapalaki or in this case, para you can keep your job. Pag naabuso ka, minsan you even give excuses to your abusers. If you read their exchanges, they were talking about Gretchen rejecting the defendant. May irereject ba kung walang advances na naganap o kung hindi nya type si Gretchen in the first place? Saka bakit kahit pajoke ay magcocomment ka ng something sleazy to your colleague? Kahit pa sabihin mong culture ng company yun, inappropriate yun eh. Tapos dradrama sya na kesyo they are making everything in their powers to help Gretchen’s career, etc. Bakit kailangan may drama and paguilty effect kung trabaho mo naman ang magpaganda ng image ng isang talent? Diba dapat professional lang ang evaluation at assessment sa trabaho? They became too close for comfort. And although the defendant did not have the power to fire Gretchen, she had a say on which videos to air and she had a say in the evaluation of Gretchen’s performance. Guys naman, tingnan nyo naman si Gretchen, may appeal yung babae. Natype-an yan ng defendant! Para namang ang hirap bang paniwalaan non? Natypean kaya nagpapacute at nagdradrama kapag nagiinteract sila and that made it uncomfortable for Gretchen. Parang tumatapak sa numero and she felt the need to appease them.
Did you read the document? She said she welcomes the legal process. Who says she is backing down? And have you read their affidavit? Trial by publicity especially when one party has an obvious advantage in social media is what’s wrong in our society nowadays.
it's everyone's right to appeal to higher form of court if you think justice was not served. in the same way, countersuit may be filed if you think you also need justice from the accuser.
I rather think enough of these press releases. The battle is in the courts. Let the judges in lower, appeals, or supreme court's decide. Enough of using media to court public opinions whether or not they're with or against your opponent.
Hindi ka matatanggal sa ABS if wala kang masamang intention or ginawa, kaya na dismiss ang sexual harassment ay dahil kulang sa evidence at mahirap talaga iprove. Truth is, nag file uli si Gretchen sa court, I doubt na mapapanalo niya. Pero naniniwala ako na may ginawa ka talagang mali, ginamit mo ang position mo, very subtle, mahirap iprove, pero meron meron meron!!!
i agree, 11.55. the text messages can stand alone, dun pa lang makikita mo yung misconduct. it's not language you use in the workplace, with your colleagues. and the fact na it's normal daw for them, parang 'huh, really??'
What they're saying is, abscbn wanted her out. Yung mga text niya lang ang evidence. Eh ano pa kaya yung mga non verbal communication na naganap? Yung mga mind games na naganap between superior and subordinate?
I read the documents in full and anyone who did cannot in good conscience believe that the purported victim is a genuine victim. This couple is being publicly shamed and persecuted.
Sorry but if she were truly innocent she’d fight back....Gretchen has too much evidence against her so she’s backing down.
ReplyDeleteWhat "evidence" are you speaking of?
DeleteHave gou seen the actual evidence filed before the court?
so much evidence? ei puros texts nga lang ang nilalabas na piling pili pa para paboran sya
DeleteSorry but I don't believe Gretchen's story. Siya itong mahilig maginvite, she was the one na dumikit kay Favila and Asprec. Why would someone who felt violated for 3 yrs, 3 yrs, invite to go on nights out na sila lang dalawa, yung offender nya?
DeleteAnon 1:29 exactly why invite your supposedly "offender" kung you felt vuolated andaming loophole ng mga evidences ni Gretchen. Sana nga walang trial by public na mangyari
DeleteYou can be a battered wife and still bear a child with your offender. Gretchen was doing her best to keep her job and that includes nurturing relationships with her bosses and colleagues. Hindi porke’t naginvite ka ng dinner eh wala ng inappropriate actions against you yung mga taong involved. Minsan nga pinapalampas mo nalang para hindi mapalaki or in this case, para you can keep your job. Pag naabuso ka, minsan you even give excuses to your abusers. If you read their exchanges, they were talking about Gretchen rejecting the defendant. May irereject ba kung walang advances na naganap o kung hindi nya type si Gretchen in the first place? Saka bakit kahit pajoke ay magcocomment ka ng something sleazy to your colleague? Kahit pa sabihin mong culture ng company yun, inappropriate yun eh. Tapos dradrama sya na kesyo they are making everything in their powers to help Gretchen’s career, etc. Bakit kailangan may drama and paguilty effect kung trabaho mo naman ang magpaganda ng image ng isang talent? Diba dapat professional lang ang evaluation at assessment sa trabaho? They became too close for comfort. And although the defendant did not have the power to fire Gretchen, she had a say on which videos to air and she had a say in the evaluation of Gretchen’s performance. Guys naman, tingnan nyo naman si Gretchen, may appeal yung babae. Natype-an yan ng defendant! Para namang ang hirap bang paniwalaan non? Natypean kaya nagpapacute at nagdradrama kapag nagiinteract sila and that made it uncomfortable for Gretchen. Parang tumatapak sa numero and she felt the need to appease them.
DeleteDid you read the document? She said she welcomes the legal process. Who says she is backing down? And have you read their affidavit? Trial by publicity especially when one party has an obvious advantage in social media is what’s wrong in our society nowadays.
ReplyDeleteKorek
DeleteAgree. I read the document in full.
DeleteWell-said, Cheryl.
ReplyDeleteit's everyone's right to appeal to higher form of court if you think justice was not served. in the same way, countersuit may be filed if you think you also need justice from the accuser.
ReplyDeleteI rather think enough of these press releases. The battle is in the courts. Let the judges in lower, appeals, or supreme court's decide. Enough of using media to court public opinions whether or not they're with or against your opponent.
ReplyDeleteI am with Cheryl and Maricar on this. Well said.
ReplyDeleteNgayong kayo ang sangkot, nakikiusap kayo na wag i-media. Samantalang sa ibang tao, wala kayong pake kahit ibulatlat nyo ang buhay nila.
ReplyDeleteKaya nga. Appeals to end media war pro ang statement aping api na nagca cause pa ng further speculation. Pa victim na naman ang ganap as always
Deleteang haba haba na nitong seryeng ito at napakahaba ng mga papeles, sa korte na lang nila pag usapan yan.
ReplyDeleteHindi ka matatanggal sa ABS if wala kang masamang intention or ginawa, kaya na dismiss ang sexual harassment ay dahil kulang sa evidence at mahirap talaga iprove. Truth is, nag file uli si Gretchen sa court, I doubt na mapapanalo niya. Pero naniniwala ako na may ginawa ka talagang mali, ginamit mo ang position mo, very subtle, mahirap iprove, pero meron meron meron!!!
ReplyDeletei agree, 11.55. the text messages can stand alone, dun pa lang makikita mo yung misconduct. it's not language you use in the workplace, with your colleagues. and the fact na it's normal daw for them, parang 'huh, really??'
DeleteWhat they're saying is, abscbn wanted her out. Yung mga text niya lang ang evidence. Eh ano pa kaya yung mga non verbal communication na naganap? Yung mga mind games na naganap between superior and subordinate?
ReplyDeleteI read the documents in full and anyone who did cannot in good conscience believe that the purported victim is a genuine victim. This couple is being publicly shamed and persecuted.
ReplyDelete