Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Overwhelming Majority of Surveyed Respondents Believe Women Should Not be Taxed an Additional 20% for Wanting to be Beautiful


29 comments:

  1. Kalokohan! Halos wala ngang magastos sa pagpapaganda tapos lalagyan pa ng tax?

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's Dudirty for you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. that's the make up industry changing the meaning of beauty.

      Delete
    2. agree ako saio anon 820..and anon 132,duterte agad may kasalanan??

      Delete
    3. Tama lang iTax , iDevelop ang magandang kalooban una sa lahat,🎯

      Delete
    4. Truth is beauty..

      Delete
    5. Only God is faithful and true

      Delete
    6. @9:38 hi dutertard. kung hindi ba naman bilyon bilyon ang inilaan sa "drug war" at "intelligence" budget ng gobyerno ni du30 e may sapat na pondo ung ibang sectors at di na kelangan magakyat pa ng buwis. 2 cents. So oo si digong agad.

      Delete
    7. 12:48 dear Loyalist, please chew on the fact that the drug epidemic started with previous admins. Your outraged is misplaced.

      Delete
  3. tax ng tax tapos nanakawin din so anong pinag bago? pupunta lang sa mga timawang politicians ung extra tax 🤣🤣🤣

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yun yung dating gawain. ngayon gusto ng baguhin. kailangan ng bansa ng pondo. kaya daming tax na kinoconsider. sa ibang bansa ganyan. wala silang reklamo kasi napapakinabangan nila. sana tayo din may pakinabangan.

      Delete
    2. Pwede bang makinabang muna bago dagdagan ang buwis? Wala pa akong napakinabangan sa buwis ko eh! Traffic forever, lubak pa rin ang daan, binabaha pa rin sa amin, mrt na di gumagana, puro lagay at padulas bago makabukas ng maliit na negosyo at ang plaka ng kotse ko eh wala pa rin hanggang ngayon. Sinong gaganahang magbayad ng buwis niyan???

      Delete
    3. How can you face the problem if the problem is your faxe

      Delete
  4. So yung pagpapaganda dpat no tax pero kung gusto mo kumain meron...ano ms importante ang gumanda o kumain...hindi nmn isguro ikamamatay ng tao kpag hnd k ngpaganda pero ang hindi kumain..e ewan kn lng.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. Okay lang may tax ito pero dapat tanggalin ang vat sa food.

      Delete
    2. Korek. Unahing bawasan ng tax yung mga needs natin for survival.

      Delete
    3. okay lang may tax basta nakikita kng saan napupunta ang pera at napapakinabangan ng mamamayan.

      Delete
    4. the problem is these taxes only go to the pockets / bank accounts of corrupt politicians.

      Delete
  5. External Beauty is not essential. Dapat lang tax more ang hindi importante

    ReplyDelete
  6. dapat nga itax yan.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sige may tax, pero 20%???!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sige may tax, pero dapat may makita akong pinupuntahan ang tax ko!!! Hindi yang puro drowing at pangakong nilista sa tubig!

      Delete
  8. Sino bang gusto ng tax, kahit anong product pa yan, di gusto ng tax

    ReplyDelete
  9. ridiculous! ok if alam mo me progress sa bans e wall. p.steng 16m yan. salaaming jan kukunin ang raise sa mag kapulisan. walang asenso puro pabigat.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Tax dito, tax doon. Ung idinagdag na tax dati, di ko parin maramdaman.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am all for taxing anything that is not a prerequisite for living a sustainable life. Depends really on the scheme.... but in general, I am all for higher taxes on elecitve items so long as I know that it will work for the general public

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hmmmm...I’m already beautiful so it’s okay.

    ReplyDelete