Ambient Masthead tags

Monday, December 7, 2015

Jim Paredes Posts His Unpublished Article on Mocha Unson to Clarify Tirades Allegedly Towards Him








Images courtesy of www.jimparedes.com

140 comments:

  1. Napakabastos pala ng matandang to! Ayaw nya na may kokontra sa baluktot nyang opinion!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Says you? Patas pang sla kung ganun. Mag inarte bang inosente si Mocha? Nagpapakontrobersya ang locha dahil walang career yan.

      Delete
    2. Nalilito na ako!
      Akala ko ba ang kwento is pinuna ni JP si duterte dahil bastos?
      Tapos pinuna ni mocha c jp na pareho lng cla ni duterte na bastos.
      bakit ang haba na ng article na ito?

      Delete
    3. san kaya nya 'to nipost ng makapag comment mismo sa blog nya..

      Delete
    4. Mas makikilala mo pa ang na interview ng Sugod Bahay Gang eh kesa sa pag humanize kuno niya! eh kaya hindi na publish itong article Dahil walang kwenta! ASAN YUNG AUDIO INTERVIEW?!!!! Iniisplice pa cguro ni Manong Sick Jim! Parang pari kasi galing ng ateneo eh! ILABAS MO YUNG AUDIO AT NANG MALAMAN NG MGA TAO PANO KA MAGTANONG AT DUMISKARTE!

      Delete
    5. Pag hindi inilabas ni tatang ang video o audio alams na!

      Delete
  2. Manong Jim, ano po meron. Bat ganyan ka po ka-famew***e ngayon? Pwede po bang stop na. Tama naa yaaannn *Lola Tinidora*

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hindi talaga maarok ng utak mo yan, bukod sa ingles may sense kasi ang sulat nya. May moral lesson din. Pang showbiz balita lang kaya ng sintido mo anon 1:40

      Delete
    2. tama ka dyan @2:12. tulog na Mocha.

      Delete
    3. Just because he used so many english words do not necessarily mean he made sense 212. no need to attack people here just to defend jim.

      Delete
    4. Hindi lahat ng sinasabi niya may sense parang ikaw 2:12

      Delete
    5. naku ang haba. dapat ung audio na lang. para isang upuan lang at hindi ako maduling duling. panigurado si 2:12 hindi din to binasa :)))

      Delete
    6. Anon 2:12 ang kailangan namin dito ang katotohanan hindi yung mga palabok na salita ni paredes para mapagtakpan ang kabastusan at kaipokritohan nya!

      Delete
  3. eh yung audio po ba asan na hindi pa ba tapos iedit? sorry pero sino ba t**nga maglalagay ng kabastusan or ikakasira sa sariling article? syempre un ilalagay mo sa article mo un bagay na alam mo hindi mo din ikakasira at ikakabuti ng article mo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mismo! Anung gustong patunayan ni jimmy boy sa paglalabas nito,na hindi sya nagpahayag ng sexual innuendos kay mocha during the interview? Ang engot lang! Maniwala pa ako kung hidden unedited video. Sus lolo,ano ka ngayon? Nagmmalinis kasi eh!

      Delete
    2. Malamang Hindi na natin maririnig! Parang yung mga Wala na din tayong narinig sa mga pagtatakip ng ka yellow tards niya! Kung me ilabas man eh as usual edited na!

      Delete
    3. Lalong mawawalan ng credibility si Jim kapag wala syang audio o video dahil mas maraming hindi naniniwala sa edited na article na yan!

      Delete
  4. Pfffttt dapat audio o video! pano mapapatunayan yung sinabi ni mocha abt sa mga pagtatanong niya!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. tama dahil point of view at edited ni JP ang article so biased.

      Delete
    2. Tatang Jim, interview ba yan, tanong mo sagot mo?

      Delete
  5. Yun na yon? Actually parang walang sense or di ko lang naintindihan? Hahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simple lang naman ang English na ginamit ni Jim Paredes ah. Baka nga Hindi mo maintindihan. Balik ka na lang sa tablod showbiz balita.

      Delete
    2. Ang ibig ko sabihin is parang may kulang eh.. Parang wala naman dyan yung issue na nabanggit nila. The article i know was plain and simple but then wala dyan yung mga motibo ni kuya na sinasabi ni mocha.

      Delete
    3. 2:15
      Panay comment ah!

      Delete
  6. WALANG KWENTA ITO! ARTICLE NA ITO EH! YUNG AUDIO DAPAT NUNG USAPAN NILA KUNG SAAN SINABI NI MOCHA NUNG TINANONG SIYA NI JP KUNG MALIBOG BA SIYA OR HITTING ON HER AND MAE...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pwede ring ma edit yung audio. hindi tanga si jim para ilahad ang ikakasira nya. well anyway, kahit anong gawin nya, people would no longer believe him.

      Delete
    2. ate 7:56... between mocha and jim naman... hello? so mas maniniwala ka sa tabloid kaysa sa broadsheet? tsk tsk

      Delete
    3. 12:22 alin, yung broadsheet na maka-dilaw? Pwe!

      Delete
  7. Parang wala naman akong nakuhang malaman na istorya about mocha? Parang dinescribe mo lang siya ng mahabang mahaba na hindi ko nakuha ang climax ng kwento.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eh papano nga na concentrate na si Tatang JP sa ALINDOG ni Mocha at Mae! Kaya panay na ang tanong niya ng kung ano ano sa kanila baka kasi kumagat! Kaya ganyan kinalabasan ng article hahahaha!

      Delete
    2. True! Binasa ko ung pagka habang article, para bang isa lang siyang mahabang description or intro kay Mocha

      Delete
  8. Ang haba ng article

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mahaba na yan para sayo? kawawa naman ang pilipinas. parang awa mo na...educate yourself. go beyond fp for reading material paminsan minsan

      Delete
    2. Its too short actually! Halatang ginawa lang ang "unpublished" article overnight. Hahahahahaha

      Delete
    3. Ke mahaba ke maiksi walang kwenta!

      Delete
  9. so now i wonder what mocha's intention really was when she blasted jim when apparently what happened was a professional and repectful interview.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pinagtatatype mo! Asan ang interview?! Story nlng yan walang audio ng interview!

      Delete
    2. Jim tulog na! Hindi mo kame maloloko, andali daling gumawa ng kwento na kunyari "article" kuno! Kahit akez pwede akong gumawa ng article na "bakla, ang susunod na Darna"! Ganern! LOL LOL ilabas mo na lang yung audio kasi ng MAGKA-ALAMAN NA! LOL LOL ulit!

      Delete
    3. 1:56 asan ang interview meron ba?

      Delete
    4. if you recall, it was jim who outed himself. soya ang react nang react. she did not name him. whether it is obvious or not, nasa pag iisip na nung mga nakabasa iyon.

      Delete
  10. may mga babae talagang di mapagkakatiwalaan. gagawin ang lahat para lag sirain ang iba.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. marami ding lalakeng bastos at malib*g. gagawin ang lahat para sirain ang babae kung hindi sila makatsansing.

      Delete
    2. It goes both ways. Walang gender ang kawalanghiyaan.

      Delete
  11. So ano ipinag puputok ng butse ni mocha, napaka mild naman pala ng article na yan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ay Jim kaloka ka, sunod sunod ang comment starting from 1:56?! Ilabas mo na lang kasi yung audio interview DALI para maging credible ka naman! LOL LOL

      Delete
    2. 2:08 mukhang si jim ang nagpuputok ang butse kasi react ng react! napuyat si lolo sa pag-type ng interview kuno na wala namang interviewee!

      Delete
  12. Ang haba. Such a waste of time to read it. si Jim na ba ang tatakbo bilang presidente? me substitution bang magaganap?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kulelat yong manok nila kaya baka si tandang Jim ang su-substitute!

      Delete
  13. Ginagawang politics yung issue eh ang punotdulo naman eh allegedly bastos yung ginawa niya kaya wala siyang karapatang manghusga ng iba. Yun ang sagutin niya. Plain and simple explanation lang kailangan para straight to the point tapos move on. Huwag na niya idamay si Mar l si Duterte.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. neng ang puno't dulo eh ang pagpuna ni jim paredes sa kabastusan ni duterte. hindi mo pala alam ang issue, ko-comment-comment ka na parang ang galing mo. hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

      Delete
    2. anon 12:27 nagsimula yan sa pagpuna ng isang bastos na patago ang kabastusan! akala mo kung sinong santo si tandang jim e malaswa rin pala ang bibig

      Delete
  14. Ang judgmental naman pala nung article nya eh. Kunyaring psychologist pa.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Para-paraan lang baka daw maka-isa si lolo! hohoho!

      Delete
  15. His article doesn't prove anything. He is still a self righteous and hypocritical a$$.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Where is the "meat" of the article? Parang kulang. Kung sa meeting ninyo nung babae marami kang tinanong bakit yung article dinescribe mo lang siya? Ang significant info lang yung tungkol sa family background, pero parang dinescribe lang rin...this article is weak, there is not much to it than the musings of Jim Paredes.

    If you interview somebody for an article with the intention of letting your audience get to know your subject on a deeper level, you write more profoundly on their personal side so as to humanize your subject. So that the reader understands the rationale to your subject's being. So that at the end of the article, the reader can understand who the real person is and what is it about them that the public does not yet know.

    Jim Paredes came and went to a meeting with Mocha Uson, asked her questions using vulgar and lascivious language, but wrote very little about the "real" person. I certainly didn't think any differently about her after reading the article because it lacked substance and heart. All he did was describe her as people already know her. Did he ask her about her hobbies? Or what her passion is in life? What was her relationship like with her parents, siblings. What was she like as a kid? What is her best achievement in life thus far? Who does she look up to? What is her guiding principle in living life in the spotlight? What would she have become if she were not doing what she does now? What would she like the public to know about her that they do not yet know yet? Etc...etc...

    Was their meeting just all about (please pardon me) "ka-libugan?" What this weak article tells me is that the meeting or interview was as shallow and weak as the final product. That is why I am inclined to believe that Jim Paredes was probably vulgar and lascivious towards his subject during the interview.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes! This!
      Sana Vaks ikaw na lang nag interview mas maganda pa sanang article ang lumabas.

      Delete
    2. Yup. You pretty much summed it up. Good job 2.55!

      Just a thought, JP probably didn't have enough material for a substantive piece because he was too busy being his perverted self. HA! #BeSelfRighteousPaMore

      Delete
    3. Very-well said anon 2:55!

      Delete
    4. Kahit sa korte hindi tatanggapin kung ang article na yan ang gagawing ebidensya! TRANSCRIPT of the said interview ang hihingin sa korte!

      Delete
    5. Part of Jim's article "But I wanted more, I do not know if you would believe me but I was eager to get to know about the real person..." And "I asked her what other passions she had..." Jim wrote what Mocha can only give. If Jim wants to write about Mocha's sexcapades for the sake of "ka-libugan" why would he bother asking her about things that are not related to sex? Maybe you and most of the commenters here are offended about Vaginas, Clitoris, sex with both sexes, etc. Watch VM maybe you'll get it.

      Delete
    6. at wala man lang ni isang direct qoute from Uson. A direct qoute from an interviewee gives an article a more authentic feel, flavour and objectivity.

      Delete
    7. Agree 2:55 and well said. And now he's using whatever reputation he has as Jim Paredes the singer and activist to discredit the woman's character just because she dared to question his perceived righteousness. In a way, it is bullying. Kumbaga, hindi siya puwedeng kuwestiyunin ng isang tulad ni mocha LANG dahil magkaiba ang level nila. Kaya nililihis niya ngayon ang isyu sa pamamagitan ng paninira sa pagkatao nung isa.

      So full of hubris. Nakakawalang respeto tong si Mr. Paredes.

      Delete
    8. 1:17, you missed 2:55's point. Isang tanong isang sagot ba yung interview? Kasi walang masyadong laman yung sinulat. Parang pinresent lang yung idea pero walang lalim. Anyway, Ang siste siyempre hindi aamin si Jim na binastos niya si Mocha dahil nga holier than thou ang peg niya. Sana yung audio ang ilabas niya para marinig kung ano at paano mga tanong niya.

      Delete
    9. 1:17 "And I asked her...blah blah blah..." So ano ang eksaktong sagot ni Mocha? Bakit hindi nya ni-quote?

      Delete
  17. mas mahaba pa ung explanation nya kaysa sa article. pinutol agad ung article and nag explain na! wow! defensive! HYPOCRITE JIM! uso tlga ang character assassination sa mga yan.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Alam ko na kung bakit hindi na-approve ng editor ito. Eh wala naman kasing sense! Ang panget ng pagkakasulat nya. Hindi nya naitawid yung message na gusto nya, kung anuman yun. Parang naghanap lang sya ng excuse na makausap si Mocha about sex, sa totoo lang. At doon naman sa issue nilang dalawa, parang mali rin ang pagkakaintindi ni Mr. Paredes. Hindi na-offend si Mocha sa interview nyo. Nabwisit sya kasi ang lakas ng loob mong magalit kay Duterte, eh dalawa naman pala kayong bastos. Iyon ang point ni Mocha.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. E 'stalker' din pala si lolo sa blog ni Mocha! Tinablan siguro! Lol!

      Delete
    2. Ginawa nya lang dahilan ang interview na yan para masilayan ang kaseksihan ni Mocha!

      Delete
  19. ay nku ang issue lng dyan eh bastos din c JP..pinupuna nya c duterte na bastos eh cya din pala..un lng ang gusto iparating ni mocha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yon nga din eh.bat ang layo na ng narating ni tatang?

      Delete
    2. Tumpak! Napaka-simple, ayaw lang intindihin ni tandang Jim at pilit iginigiit ang politics nya kuno na alam naman ng lahat na naka-side lang kulay dilaw! Palusot pa more Jim Paredes!

      Delete
    3. karapatan ni jim yun.. di mo lang ma gets kasi maka duterte ka

      Delete
    4. 12:59 Ikaw ang hindi makaintindi! Ang ibig sabihin ni Mocha ay bastos rin si Jim Paredes! Simple!

      Delete
    5. ok, granting na bastos si jim paredes... does that cleanse duterte's image? at ano ang business ni mocha sa buhay ni duterte bakit sya naghihimutok ng ganyan?

      Delete
  20. Lol Jim wag mo nga kaming pinagloloko. Kagabi mo Lang sinulat yan. May unpublished unpublished ka pang nalalaman. Tumahimik na lang kayo pareho ni mocha.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oo nga noh wala naman siyang ebidensya

      Delete
    2. haha tama, kasi parang nakalimutan na nya yung details ng interview, parang hindi man lang nag take ng notes during the interview.

      Delete
  21. Nakita ko account nya sa isang social media puro hubad na babae. Adrenaline rush daw kung makakita sya ng katawan ng babae. Ano kaya ibig sabihin nun?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kaya ayaw nya kay Duterte kasi baka sunugin sya!

      Delete
  22. unpulished article? di mo nga tinapos, sinbi mo n agad ung opinion. hindi porket ganyan image ni MOCHA may karapatan ka n pra bastusin sya!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Jim, you are 63. you are better than this. You are a public figure, you publish your opinion that everybody should supposedly respect. Needless, you will face endless bashings because IT IS POLITICS . Yes, you will say you will have to clear your name . But do you think this will stop? Do you think everyone will believe you. MY UNSOLICITED ADVISE, stop talking politics or be dense to peoples opinion of your beliefs. AT 63, you have just started tarnishing your name. RETIRE!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  24. He writes really good.

    ReplyDelete
  25. parehas silang bastos para sa akin, wala akong mapiling matino sa kanilang dalawa

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. anon 6:23 yung isa lantad ang kabastusan! Yung isa patago! Dun na ako sa lantad!

      Delete
    2. Okey lang sana yung patago ang kabastusan, ang kaso kasi napaka Ipokrito niya kaya nakakagalit. #hypocrite

      Delete
  26. Wow! I waited for the Q&A portion, wala pala...di ko agad na.scroll haahha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Q&A din ang akala ko na ilalabas nya hahaha edited article lang pala na mismo sya ang bida! Lol!

      Delete
  27. Sorry Manong Jim. Inantok ako sa sinabi mo. Haba. Gawa ka nalang ng bagong songs mo para sumikat ka ulit.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Tapos na palang i-edit ni lolo kaya pinublish na! Okey yung video o audio naman para mas kapani-paniwala!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Saan ang interview Mr. Jim Paredes? Eh puro ka Mocha said, she said? Hindi mo man lang ni-quote kahit isa sa sagot ni Mocha sa napakarami mong tinanong? Anong klaseng interview yan?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Dapat Q&A ang interview para malaman ng lahat ang direktang sinagot ni Mocha. Parang may takot din si Jim kasi kung mag-iimbento sya ng direktang sagot ni Mocha e malalagot siya! N

    ReplyDelete
  31. Sus e halos lahat ng sinabi mo mababasa na sa blog ni Mocha, except from some personal questions na wala naman direct answers mula sa bibig ni Mocha! Yung tungkol kay Mae nakalimutan mo pero yung clit*ral vib**tor sa bag ni Mocha tandang tanda mo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Precisely. So ano ang kinakashock kuno ng mocha na yan?

      Delete
    2. 8:19 shocking din ang kakitiran ng utak mo!

      Delete
  32. Wheres the audio recordings? That article is no value at all dahil its already edited and written in his favor! Ilabas na ang mochagate scandal!

    ReplyDelete
  33. Jim, ang gusto namin mabasa yung transcript ng interview, hindi ganyan na parang nagku-kwento ka lang ng halos alam na ng madlang pipol!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ano naman ang pakialam ko sa gusto mo teh. hindi ko din naman ipipilit sa yo ang gusto ko ok? - jim

      Delete
    2. 12:23 ang sabihin mo, sinungaling ka! - mocha

      Delete
  34. Bakit kasi sha nag react ee blond item nga ung sinulat ni mocha? funnehh! Kuntodo explain si jim may pa article article pa! ee wala naman sinabi c mocha na sha un..

    ReplyDelete
  35. Nothing has changed el Jim! Nananatili ka pa ring isang biased na Noytard na bulag at bingi sa kapalpakan ng yellow administration!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. so why bash the pnoy supporters? kasi takot ang mga kalaban?

      Delete
    2. Anon 12:38 Anong ikakatakot sa nangungulelat sa survey ang manok? Kahit pumangalawa man lang sana ang manok, pero ayun at laging pinakakain ng alikabok! Bakit? Dahil isinusuka ng mas nakararaming Pilipino ang tuwad na daan!

      Delete
    3. 12:38. yun naman pala eh... kakaunti na nga lang ang sense na meron kayo bakit aaksayahin nyo pa sa paghatak pababa sa nasa ilalim naman pala?

      Delete
  36. Title na title pa lang for Sunday reading? Ano ka?? Akala ko ba relihiyoso ka? Nakalimutan mo yata na ang araw ng Linggo ay araw ng pangilin sa mga Katoliko! Hindi ka na siguro makapagpigil ano?

    ReplyDelete
  37. Huwag mo kaming paandaran lolo Jim! Hindi ganyan mag-interview ng isang kilalang personality, keber kung kilala sya sa kalaswaan! Ni wala ka man lang kinowt sa EKSAKTONG sagot niya sa tanong mo?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Defensive to the Max? Uwi ka na lang ng Australia. Citizen ka naman doon di ba?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Wala na raw yung audio sabi ni Jim. Besides, wag na lang daw para ma respect si Mocha. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anong alam ni Jim sa salitang respect?

      Delete
  40. Ganyan talaga pag guilty, dami chechebureche english wannabe. DOM eh.

    ReplyDelete
  41. well-written naman pala..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Baka well-edited ang gusto mong sabihin anon 10:58!

      Delete
  42. we are entitled to our own opinion. Jim, if ure supporting Mar then so be it. Mocha is supporting Duterte. Why make a fuss and make an effort to make ur point?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Sobrang haba... kakapagod basahin.

    ReplyDelete
  44. patola lang ang peg?? hay nako tama n baks!! nakakasawa

    ReplyDelete
  45. between jim and mocha.. josko... kay jim ako.. si mocha na binastos kuno eh in the first place matagal na syang kabastos bastos... magtigil nga sya..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kabastos bastos man siya, hindi pa rin siya dapat bastusin. It will show more about you that her. Imahe lamang po ng tao iyun bilang isang artista. Yun ang punto.

      Delete
    2. Correct! Mocha vs Jim. Di hamak naman respectable si Jim. E si mocha??

      Delete
    3. Mabuti pa si Mocha lantad ang kabastusan, yang idol mo santo santito na bastos rin pala ang tabas ng dila!

      Delete
    4. Day,ang pinupoint ni mocha hindi yung nabastos sya,i think sanay sya dun at kilala nya self nya. And di nya kaya eh ung ginawa ni jp kay duterte eh napakabastos din naman pala nya. Eh di kay jp ka. Yellowtard k din talaga.

      Delete
    5. 12:58PM such a judgmental person! kau na sinless ni jim!

      Delete
    6. Exactly! Not a fan of PNoy and the yellow tards pero namaaaan, given mocha's background and how open she is sa mga sex issues, i don't understand how she could have expected na pang-kumbento ang interview nila. Given the reason for her popularity, dapat alam na nya kung anong klaseng questions ang ibabato sa kanya. I'm for lolo Jim. Pero dito lang sa usaping to.

      Delete
  46. Hell has no fury for a 'man' scorned! Why do you have to stoop so low for an issue, you're an icon and she's, i don't know who she is but she is still a woman. And she has her opinions and yours, you got better things to do like composing songs. I'm a fan of your column and this is just something i don't expect from a man idolized by most composers, Conduct unbecoming.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Pustahan tayo papainterview si mocha tapos iiyak yan haha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hindi ugali ni Mocha ang umiyak at kumuha ng sympathy! Hintay ka lang Jim Paredes, laban kung laban!

      Delete
  48. Koyang Jim halatang halatang in-edit mo ang article na yan!

    ReplyDelete
  49. DUTERTE IS TOP CHOICE FOR PRESIDENT! - SWS SURVEY!

    Jim Paredes doesn't like this!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The survey that utilized leading question. You don't have to write a dissertation to know that a leading question is a not a valid question.

      Delete
    2. 1159 pero kung si Mar ang nanguna sa survey, wala sa inyo yang leading question na sinasabi mo! ganyan ang malacanang, pag si pnoy mataas sa survey wala silang reklamo! pero pag bumagsak ang approval rating ni pnoy huwag daw mag-rely sa survey! hahaha funny!

      Delete
  50. I was expecting a transcribed interview.like yung mga napapublish sa magazines kapag may featured celebrities hindi POV article na di naman nadefend yung accusations ni mocha about mr.paredes

    ReplyDelete
  51. sabi ni Mocha hindi naman raw siya lang ang OPM artist na may hit song and so on. At wala rin naman pinangalanang JIM PAREDES.. bakit nga ba ang bilis niya mag-react? LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. may point si mocha jan ahaha.

      Delete
    2. Well ilan ba ang naginterview sa kanya na opm artist na may hit song? Saka nagsagutan na sila sa twitter bago nya nilabas ang blind item kuno.

      Delete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...