Alam di namin iyan Lea.. Kung contraceptives nga hirap na hirap ipasa dito thru RH Bill, iyan pa kaya.. For 300 years iyan ang turo sa atin ng Spain, panahon pa ni Rizal - na ang simbahan ay Diyos, mataas pa sa gobyerno. Kaya walang family planning dito, walang responsible parenting, walang population control. Sana mabago na kasi puputok na ang populasyon ng Pilipinas!
If only nagbasa muna si leah ng history, that church and state separation is just an illusion! Ang gumawa ng Constitution ng America and Phil are Mason and Jesuits known followers of Satan! Lalo na yung Constitution natin! They were made by Masons and Jesuits na laging base ng mga communist rallyist pag kinicondition nila taong bayan for some issues, and sunod naman ang mga sheeps coz they believe in the Constitution and handa silang mamatay para dito! Pero yung Bible, ah gawa lang din ng tao yan eh, tao lang din sumulat niyan....
@2:48 Thats not a theory thats a fact! Magbasa basa muna kasi before commenting para hindi napaghahalata na isa ka sa mga hindi dapat magparami ng lahi at pahirap sa iba dahil sa kamangmangan!
Anak ng jueteng naman oo nakakatol na naman itong si Mason. Ito lang masasabi ko, ang bansang napasukan ng relihiyon (hindi lang katoliko) ay walang asenso, mga mahihirap na bansa. Ang mga factors na nakita sa mga mahihirap na bansa kagaya ng Pilipinas 1.corrupt na gobyerno 2.kultura ng katamaran at walang pakialam sa nakawan sa gobyerno 3.napasukan ng relihiyon na nagtatakda ng maraming limitasyon sa kakayahan ng tao dahil karaniway itinurong ipagpasa Diyos na lang. Kailangan ng tao ang Diyos pero nasa tao pa din dapat ang gawa. Facts iyan, igoogle niyo pa.
1:01am hahaha nakakatawa ang argument mo. halatang hindi mo alam kung ano ang fiction at kung ano ang totoo. documented nga yang theory, documented by the anti jesuit writer na sobrang fan at believer ka naman. pumunta ka sa pinakamalapit na karpintero teh, maluwag ng turnilyo ng utak mo!
On the contrary, there is no separation between state and church in the Philippines. The Catholic Church is pretty much a big part of the government. They are able to influence what laws are to be amended.
@101 she has her platform. sikat. ang opinyon mo, hanggand dito lang, anonymous pa. hehehe! i dare you to post your opinions/theory on everything sa kahit anong social media platform...fb, twitter, mag-blog ka, o buhayin mo ang multiply....basta may tunay na pangalan mo...may papansin ba? ha?
Sa mga gusto ng pagbabago, pag me lumabas na talaga na baguhin ang mga nakasanayan niyo e panigurado kamumuhian niyo ang magpapatupad nun. Coz aminin niyo man o hindi condition na ang mga isipan niyo na pag me nakita kayong iba sa norm eh kalupitan ang magiging interpretation niyo. Kelangan niyo munang itapon o kalimutan lahat ng alam niyo then study what was not taught in school. Especially HISTORY.... but why would you do that when you are being entertained and distracted by all these medium.
Yung argument ni @4:21 e papano mo maeexplain yung saudi, uae, kuwait, italy, turkey, russia, me mga relihiyon itong mga ito pati nga china eh, bakit sila nagyayamanan?! Mas marami pang limitasyon ang mga bansang ito kesa sa atin at mas corrupt pa hindi lang lantad. Hahahaha! Yung argument mo is toinks! Ganito ang tamang pagesplika, depende sa resources ng mga bansa and kung saan at paano gagamitin ito ng mga Masong ayaw mong tanggapin na nagpapatakbo ng mundo! Ang Japan wala silang natural resources and yet they act as one kaya kita mo paano tayo nilampaso ng mga ito nung world war 2 and ang nagpakilos and nagimpluwensya at nageducate sa sinusunod nilang emperor e mga Mason! They were moved by their belief of their emperor and they did rule so yang comment mo is basura like ng utak mong katol!
Well. Thats true. Lahat pinapakialaman ng church sa estado pero hindi pa kasi talaga tayo TOTALLY handang ilegalize yung mga bagay na legal na sa ibang bansa like use of mj, same sex marriage, abortion, divorce, death penalty.
The Roman Empire is long gone, its successors, the Byzantine Empire (Eastern Roman Empire) and Holy Roman Empire (Western Roman Empire) have also been long gone.. The theory of the world being controlled by a few powerful families (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Bush, Windsor, Aldobrandini, Pallavicini, etc..) may be true and that the Bilderberg Group controls everything may be a conspiracy or not, still naniniwala ko na good changes can be made.. Vox Populi, Vox Dei - The Voice of the People (is) the Voice of God.. --- Filipino scion of one of the oldest noble families in Europe
@6:18 Yan ang pinapaniwala syo coz wala kang alam abt sa prophecy ng bible...ang roman empire e buhay na buhay nung panahon nung spanish empire at british empire kung tawagin. And they answer to Austria AKA Habsburg aka Bohemia aka ROMAN EMPIRE. Which is in turn answer to the now you know as Vatican, Rome. Hindi nawala ito, ang empire na nila now is the US. Yung binanggit mo is their money and media arm pwera pa yung military arm and religion arm nila.
agree...hanggang ngayon nakikialam pa rin ang simbahan sa pamahalaan, and the worst thing, noon Simbahang Katoliko lang, ngayon me INC na, JIL...hay halu-halong kalamay na!
Sang ayon din ako dyan divorce at rh bill muna ang unahin! maging legal muna ang paghihiwalay at hindi dapat pakialaman ng simbahan ang civil marriage.
1256 wow, hard to please ka naman masyado. Kahit yung mga international achievements nya in the theater world, di ka din natuwa dun kahit papano? Hehe. Kanino ka ba natutuwa?
Yup. Now palang eh dami comments on social media against same sex marriage. Pinoys are hardcore religious, regardless. I don't think we're ready for that although IMO as long as you love, respect and are devoted to each other, it's fine whatever.
Tama c Madam Lea! For me support muna ako sa bill about rights for gender equality and anti discrimanation for LGBT. It will take time bago maunawaan ng mga tao ang Same sex marraige.
@2:26 Kaya nga may kasabihan, ang pag-aasawa ay hindi kanin na pag isinubo mo ay pwede mo rin iluwa. Bakit mo isisisi sa religion yung kawalan disiplina ng mga tao? At pag-aasawa nila ng basta basta lang?
Well, not everyone has the same faith. So stop imposing (religion) righteousness on someone feet. We have shed tears, blood and lives since the dark ages. Don't you think life before is better than now? Then I question how you could fully accept if you denied their rights for equality?
Darling, religion is always good as it halters the baser nature of man. Kung walang religion like atheist Russia and Nazi germany, milyones ang pinapatay. Ang masama kapag ginagawang excuse ang religion to justify crimes, in which case we can't fault the religion itself. LOL
sana naman NO kasi dito sa america ok ang abortion then ang same sex marriage ano kaya ang isusunod na ipapasa ang multiple na asawa. iba na talaga ang mundo
I dare her to take a survey and I will bet that majority are still opposed to it. It's not really the separation of church and state but more the psyche and the religious beliefs of the Filipinos.
Ha ha, do you think kayo lang ang may alam mag google? So why would I change my religion to wed many women? Kung ang LGBT gustong magkaroon ng same sex marriage, bakit hindi puwedeng mag pakasal ang straight guy sa maraming babae? Pareho pareho lang naman tayong nag babayad ng buwis diba?
it is not about the religion, pagiging open-minded ng tao ang pagiging hypocrites. Pero sa totoo lang kahit katoliko ako, napag aralan ko dati na nasa saligang batas na bawal mangielam ang simbahan sa gobyerno and vice versa
It is about the religion - kung hindi tayo sobrang relihiyosong bansa siguro matagal na tayong maunlad. Tignan mo ang Canada, US, UK, Singpaore, and most European countries, hindi naman sila religious pero mauunlad sila.
Japan is a religious country pero maunlad sila. Russia is, also right now. So is Brazil. And 11:40, your perception may tell you otherwise but US is a country where religion still plays a very important role in society. Kung Republican ang presidente ngayon, malamang hindi magiging legal ang same-sex marriage even if the SC is left-leaning. LOL
Has-been Lea's self-righteous pontification continues. Neng, the Church's stand against same sex marriage is not based on irrationality but in fact appeals to higher reason. In principle, homosexual marriage is not universalizable as it institutionalizes reproductive incapacity. Forget about religion, let's talk biology. Kapag naperfect na ng biology ang technology kung saan pwedeng magproduce ng endogenous semen ang babae at pwedeng magdala ng bata ang lalaki, saka akess mag-aagree sa same sex marriage. Hangbabaw lang kasi ng rason na civil rights of married couple ang dahilan kung bakit kailangang i-sanction ang same sex marriage. It makes marriage a mere function of economics, despite how activists romanticize it as a celebration of love. In theory and in practice, pwede naman ang State magcreate ng civil rights for a homosexual couple that mimics the rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couple, without impinging on the institution of matrimony. LOL
Ngek kung hindi pwedeng ikasal ang mga bakla sa kadahilanang hindi sila pwedeng magka-anak, hindi rin dapat pwedeng ikasal ang mga straight couple na baog at hindi pwedeng magka-anak. RIGHT?
Mas mababaw ang reason mo that marriage is there for the sole purpose of procreation. So, it means barren couples and old people don't deserve marriage and have happy, blissful lives together?
uhm, glinda, matrimony has been practiced in earlier civilizations, even before christianity, so anong sinasabi mong create civil rights pa? civil rights ang origin ng marriage, hindi religion, kaya do us a favor and shut up.
at kung biology lang ang issue mo, there is no need to get married, civil or church. b*ba!
1:12, civil rights in earlier civilizations are not the same as civil rights today, sweetie. In case you haven't figured out yet, the concept and constitution of civil rights change depending on state and historical period. And I never said that religion is the origin of marriage. Civil rights aren't the origin either. Marriage is an institutionalization of a biological function among humans, not the other way around. Get it? LOL
And 12:24, I don't think marriage is a good option for barren couple either. May technology na ngayon wherein you can know beforehand kung manganganak ka o hindi. Kung wit talaga pwedeng masolusyunan ang fertility issues, pwede namang magsama na lang and enjoy each other's company for the rest of their lives. Again, kung marital civil rights ang habol, the State can create that for non-married couple. LOL
Hindi naman nila hinihinging magpakasal sa simbahan kasi karamihan sa mga iyan wala namang pakialam sa simbahan. Ang gusto lang nila ay pwede rin sila sa civil wedding kasi dun pwede silang mabawasan ng tax, makakuha ng healthcare, etc. Bago ka magsabi ng kabaliwan, siguraduhin mo munang may laman ang utak mo.
Wala naman mabubuo eh? Wala din naman mabubuo kung isa sa straight couple ay impotent o tinatawag sa tagalog na baog. E kung ang basehan pala ng kasal ay pagkakaanak, dapat hindi rin sila pwedeng ikasala, di ba?
True
ReplyDeleteAlam di namin iyan Lea.. Kung contraceptives nga hirap na hirap ipasa dito thru RH Bill, iyan pa kaya.. For 300 years iyan ang turo sa atin ng Spain, panahon pa ni Rizal - na ang simbahan ay Diyos, mataas pa sa gobyerno. Kaya walang family planning dito, walang responsible parenting, walang population control. Sana mabago na kasi puputok na ang populasyon ng Pilipinas!
DeleteIf only nagbasa muna si leah ng history, that church and state separation is just an illusion! Ang gumawa ng Constitution ng America and Phil are Mason and Jesuits known followers of Satan! Lalo na yung Constitution natin! They were made by Masons and Jesuits na laging base ng mga communist rallyist pag kinicondition nila taong bayan for some issues, and sunod naman ang mga sheeps coz they believe in the Constitution and handa silang mamatay para dito! Pero yung Bible, ah gawa lang din ng tao yan eh, tao lang din sumulat niyan....
Delete@1:01 andito ka na naman at sige ipagpatuloy mo lang yang teorya mo lels
Delete@2:48 Thats not a theory thats a fact! Magbasa basa muna kasi before commenting para hindi napaghahalata na isa ka sa mga hindi dapat magparami ng lahi at pahirap sa iba dahil sa kamangmangan!
DeleteAnak ng jueteng naman oo nakakatol na naman itong si Mason. Ito lang masasabi ko, ang bansang napasukan ng relihiyon (hindi lang katoliko) ay walang asenso, mga mahihirap na bansa. Ang mga factors na nakita sa mga mahihirap na bansa kagaya ng Pilipinas 1.corrupt na gobyerno 2.kultura ng katamaran at walang pakialam sa nakawan sa gobyerno 3.napasukan ng relihiyon na nagtatakda ng maraming limitasyon sa kakayahan ng tao dahil karaniway itinurong ipagpasa Diyos na lang. Kailangan ng tao ang Diyos pero nasa tao pa din dapat ang gawa. Facts iyan, igoogle niyo pa.
Delete1:01 anon kaya nga sabi ni Lea exists only on paper. Tama na ang conspiracy theory nakakatawa ka na
Delete1:01am hahaha nakakatawa ang argument mo. halatang hindi mo alam kung ano ang fiction at kung ano ang totoo. documented nga yang theory, documented by the anti jesuit writer na sobrang fan at believer ka naman. pumunta ka sa pinakamalapit na karpintero teh, maluwag ng turnilyo ng utak mo!
DeleteOn the contrary, there is no separation between state and church in the Philippines. The Catholic Church is pretty much a big part of the government. They are able to influence what laws are to be amended.
Delete@101 she has her platform. sikat. ang opinyon mo, hanggand dito lang, anonymous pa. hehehe! i dare you to post your opinions/theory on everything sa kahit anong social media platform...fb, twitter, mag-blog ka, o buhayin mo ang multiply....basta may tunay na pangalan mo...may papansin ba? ha?
DeleteSa mga gusto ng pagbabago, pag me lumabas na talaga na baguhin ang mga nakasanayan niyo e panigurado kamumuhian niyo ang magpapatupad nun. Coz aminin niyo man o hindi condition na ang mga isipan niyo na pag me nakita kayong iba sa norm eh kalupitan ang magiging interpretation niyo. Kelangan niyo munang itapon o kalimutan lahat ng alam niyo then study what was not taught in school. Especially HISTORY.... but why would you do that when you are being entertained and distracted by all these medium.
Deletepabayaan na natin si 1:01 baka dito lang yan nakakapag rant. baka wala ng makausap sa kanila kasi wala nang gustong makinig sa kanya
DeleteYung argument ni @4:21 e papano mo maeexplain yung saudi, uae, kuwait, italy, turkey, russia, me mga relihiyon itong mga ito pati nga china eh, bakit sila nagyayamanan?! Mas marami pang limitasyon ang mga bansang ito kesa sa atin at mas corrupt pa hindi lang lantad. Hahahaha! Yung argument mo is toinks! Ganito ang tamang pagesplika, depende sa resources ng mga bansa and kung saan at paano gagamitin ito ng mga Masong ayaw mong tanggapin na nagpapatakbo ng mundo! Ang Japan wala silang natural resources and yet they act as one kaya kita mo paano tayo nilampaso ng mga ito nung world war 2 and ang nagpakilos and nagimpluwensya at nageducate sa sinusunod nilang emperor e mga Mason! They were moved by their belief of their emperor and they did rule so yang comment mo is basura like ng utak mong katol!
Delete5:56, anong on the contrary? di ba yan ang implication ng sabi ni Lea? Read between the lines.
DeleteI support Same Sex Marriage, because ev'rybody deserves to be miserable.
ReplyDeleteI like how you think! Hahaha!
DeleteWinner! LOL
DeleteOn point
DeleteNot funny. Noone has the right to joke about the sanctity of marriage. Unless you're an atheist.
DeleteTry reading Voltaire, 11:44. LOL
DeleteWell. Thats true. Lahat pinapakialaman ng church sa estado pero hindi pa kasi talaga tayo TOTALLY handang ilegalize yung mga bagay na legal na sa ibang bansa like use of mj, same sex marriage, abortion, divorce, death penalty.
ReplyDeleteI would say majority ang hindi na kasi kulang sa kaalaman tungkol sa mga iyan.
DeleteDo what the romans do. For as long as we are here in the Phil we have to respect the law of the land.
ReplyDeleteWe are in the New Roman Times known as the new world order. Akala niyo ba nawala na ang roman empire?
DeleteThe Roman Empire is long gone, its successors, the Byzantine Empire (Eastern Roman Empire) and Holy Roman Empire (Western Roman Empire) have also been long gone.. The theory of the world being controlled by a few powerful families (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Bush, Windsor, Aldobrandini, Pallavicini, etc..) may be true and that the Bilderberg Group controls everything may be a conspiracy or not, still naniniwala ko na good changes can be made.. Vox Populi, Vox Dei - The Voice of the People (is) the Voice of God.. --- Filipino scion of one of the oldest noble families in Europe
Delete@6:18 Yan ang pinapaniwala syo coz wala kang alam abt sa prophecy ng bible...ang roman empire e buhay na buhay nung panahon nung spanish empire at british empire kung tawagin. And they answer to Austria AKA Habsburg aka Bohemia aka ROMAN EMPIRE. Which is in turn answer to the now you know as Vatican, Rome. Hindi nawala ito, ang empire na nila now is the US. Yung binanggit mo is their money and media arm pwera pa yung military arm and religion arm nila.
Deleteand the law of the land says there is separation of the church and the state, so your comment is pointless.
Deletefor me,, dapat i push na talaga ang Divorce as well as the child support para doon sa mga irresponsible father rather than same-sex marriage.
ReplyDeleteI agree. Unahain muna natin ang issue na yan kesa sa iba.
DeleteAgain, as what Madame Leah said, as long as the separation of church and state only exists in paper, whatever you say is impossible
Deleteagree...hanggang ngayon nakikialam pa rin ang simbahan sa pamahalaan, and the worst thing, noon Simbahang Katoliko lang, ngayon me INC na, JIL...hay halu-halong kalamay na!
ReplyDeleteMagandang negosyo kasi kaya dumadami
DeleteDivorce nga di malega-legalize, same sex marriage pa?
ReplyDeleteTama ka! Unahin na Muna nila magka divorce sa Pinas
Deleteonga true hahahahah
DeleteSang ayon din ako dyan divorce at rh bill muna ang unahin! maging legal muna ang paghihiwalay at hindi dapat pakialaman ng simbahan ang civil marriage.
DeleteNow lang ako natuwa sayo ms.lea
ReplyDelete1256 wow, hard to please ka naman masyado. Kahit yung mga international achievements nya in the theater world, di ka din natuwa dun kahit papano? Hehe. Kanino ka ba natutuwa?
DeleteYup. Now palang eh dami comments on social media against same sex marriage. Pinoys are hardcore religious, regardless. I don't think we're ready for that although IMO as long as you love, respect and are devoted to each other, it's fine whatever.
ReplyDeleteLea puro ka kuda, bakit hindi ka pumasok sa pulitika para magawan mo ng paraan.
ReplyDelete101 Pea-brain.
DeleteTama c Madam Lea!
ReplyDeleteFor me support muna ako sa bill about rights for gender equality and anti discrimanation for LGBT. It will take time bago maunawaan ng mga tao ang Same sex marraige.
lethal injection nia hindi mapatupad.
ReplyDeleteSana bago same sex marriage, divorce muna. Kailangang kailangan na yan.
ReplyDeleteAgree. Bugbugan dito, kaliwaan dun ok lang...mas importante kasi sa mga relihiyoso yung kasal kesa sa human rights ng tao. Define hypocrite.
Delete@2:26 Kaya nga may kasabihan, ang pag-aasawa ay hindi kanin na pag isinubo mo ay pwede mo rin iluwa. Bakit mo isisisi sa religion yung kawalan disiplina ng mga tao? At pag-aasawa nila ng basta basta lang?
Delete@1148 ano base base na lang sa kasabihan? lols oh yung mga napagligpitan sa mesa wag ng mag.asawa! hahaha
Deleteobvious ba na hinde hehehe mga fans din eh noh my masabi lng
ReplyDeleteIt's only in the Philippines that the catholic church still has major influence-in Italy they have divorce.
ReplyDeleteDaming problema diyan sa Pinas. Huwag unahing intindihin ang SSM.
ReplyDeleteAn empty can makes a lot of noise :)
ReplyDeleteMay point sya. Ikaw? Mema kuda lang
DeleteHay naku makacomment at maka english lng anon 1:37
Delete1:37 is apparently referring to him/herself.
Delete2:06, 4:38, 1:06... did it hurt? Masakit bang tamaan? FYI, di kayo kilala ni Tita Lea.
DeleteI support LGBT equality and acceptance but never the same-sex marriage..It demoralize all that we believed.
ReplyDeleteSame thought exactly.
DeleteWell, not everyone has the same faith. So stop imposing (religion) righteousness on someone feet. We have shed tears, blood and lives since the dark ages. Don't you think life before is better than now? Then I question how you could fully accept if you denied their rights for equality?
DeleteDarling, religion is always good as it halters the baser nature of man. Kung walang religion like atheist Russia and Nazi germany, milyones ang pinapatay. Ang masama kapag ginagawang excuse ang religion to justify crimes, in which case we can't fault the religion itself. LOL
DeleteAnon 2:36 AM, sakit sa bangs ng english mo >.<
DeleteAteng 9;21, actually hindi korek ang inggles ni 2:36. Baka yung kay 1:37 ang sinasabi mo.
Deleteuhm... SSM will give them the equality that you're talking about. We're not talking about church marriages here. educate yourself, pls.
DeleteJuly 4, 2015 at 2:36 AM - I get your point, Love it!
DeleteShe's right.
ReplyDeletesana naman NO kasi dito sa america ok ang abortion then ang same sex marriage ano kaya ang isusunod na ipapasa ang multiple na asawa. iba na talaga ang mundo
ReplyDeleteMay point ka. Ka-afraid
DeleteMga ignorante! Legal ang pag-aasawa ng madami sa Muslim countries - noong unang panahon pa! Basa basa din pag may time.
DeleteIn addition, kahit hindi pa tayo pinapanganak, madami nang tao ang madaming asawa. Huwag tongue-awe!
Divorce nga hindi makapasa, same sex marriage pa? Asa!
ReplyDeleteDi naman masama umasa.
DeleteTingnan mo ang LGBT community sa US, ang tagal ng hinintay pero nakamit nila.
I dare her to take a survey and I will bet that majority are still opposed to it. It's not really the separation of church and state but more the psyche and the religious beliefs of the Filipinos.
ReplyDeleteYou just prove her point
DeleteCorrect 3:27.
DeleteAnon 2:47 - that's the (other) explanation of Lea's point.
hirap ng reading compre!
DeleteAko I am waiting for multiple husband/wife Law. Kailan kay ito maipapasa sa Pinas? Can't wait to have multiple wives na LEGAL.
ReplyDeleteone word for you. Islam
DeleteAnon 5:26: chrew! hahaha!
DeleteAnon 3:07: matagal na hong may ganiyan sa muslim countries! basa basa po ng book para may laman konti ang isip! hehehe
Ha ha, do you think kayo lang ang may alam mag google? So why would I change my religion to wed many women? Kung ang LGBT gustong magkaroon ng same sex marriage, bakit hindi puwedeng mag pakasal ang straight guy sa maraming babae? Pareho pareho lang naman tayong nag babayad ng buwis diba?
Deleteit is not about the religion, pagiging open-minded ng tao ang pagiging hypocrites. Pero sa totoo lang kahit katoliko ako, napag aralan ko dati na nasa saligang batas na bawal mangielam ang simbahan sa gobyerno and vice versa
ReplyDeleteIt is about the religion - kung hindi tayo sobrang relihiyosong bansa siguro matagal na tayong maunlad. Tignan mo ang Canada, US, UK, Singpaore, and most European countries, hindi naman sila religious pero mauunlad sila.
DeleteJapan is a religious country pero maunlad sila. Russia is, also right now. So is Brazil. And 11:40, your perception may tell you otherwise but US is a country where religion still plays a very important role in society. Kung Republican ang presidente ngayon, malamang hindi magiging legal ang same-sex marriage even if the SC is left-leaning. LOL
DeleteDeath penalty muna para sa mga magnanakaw at manyakis please... Puro nman kamunduhan lng iniisip ng mga tao ngayon lol
ReplyDeletekailan pa naging kamunduhan ang marriage?
DeleteAyusin muna ang MRT st traffic sa EDSA bago niyo yan atupagin ng kongreso.
ReplyDeleteWala nang pag-asa iyang MRT na iyan. Pabagsak na talaga ang Pilipinas. Wala na. Itigil na ang pag-asa.
DeleteHas-been Lea's self-righteous pontification continues. Neng, the Church's stand against same sex marriage is not based on irrationality but in fact appeals to higher reason. In principle, homosexual marriage is not universalizable as it institutionalizes reproductive incapacity. Forget about religion, let's talk biology. Kapag naperfect na ng biology ang technology kung saan pwedeng magproduce ng endogenous semen ang babae at pwedeng magdala ng bata ang lalaki, saka akess mag-aagree sa same sex marriage. Hangbabaw lang kasi ng rason na civil rights of married couple ang dahilan kung bakit kailangang i-sanction ang same sex marriage. It makes marriage a mere function of economics, despite how activists romanticize it as a celebration of love. In theory and in practice, pwede naman ang State magcreate ng civil rights for a homosexual couple that mimics the rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couple, without impinging on the institution of matrimony. LOL
ReplyDeleteNgek kung hindi pwedeng ikasal ang mga bakla sa kadahilanang hindi sila pwedeng magka-anak, hindi rin dapat pwedeng ikasal ang mga straight couple na baog at hindi pwedeng magka-anak. RIGHT?
DeleteAy bumawe si Manang Glinda! Ok forgiven na yung mga past blunders mo. For now!
DeleteMas mababaw ang reason mo that marriage is there for the sole purpose of procreation. So, it means barren couples and old people don't deserve marriage and have happy, blissful lives together?
Deleteuhm, glinda, matrimony has been practiced in earlier civilizations, even before christianity, so anong sinasabi mong create civil rights pa? civil rights ang origin ng marriage, hindi religion, kaya do us a favor and shut up.
Deleteat kung biology lang ang issue mo, there is no need to get married, civil or church. b*ba!
1:12, civil rights in earlier civilizations are not the same as civil rights today, sweetie. In case you haven't figured out yet, the concept and constitution of civil rights change depending on state and historical period. And I never said that religion is the origin of marriage. Civil rights aren't the origin either. Marriage is an institutionalization of a biological function among humans, not the other way around. Get it? LOL
DeleteAnd 12:24, I don't think marriage is a good option for barren couple either. May technology na ngayon wherein you can know beforehand kung manganganak ka o hindi. Kung wit talaga pwedeng masolusyunan ang fertility issues, pwede namang magsama na lang and enjoy each other's company for the rest of their lives. Again, kung marital civil rights ang habol, the State can create that for non-married couple. LOL
DeleteSang-ayon ako sayo Glinda.
Deleteand this is the beginning of another change in the concept of marriage, sweetie. try stopping that.
DeleteIt began in the Netherlands more than ten years ago, 11:34, and you know what? It stopped at the borders of western countries. LOL
DeletePinas is still in the dark ages with so many social issues.
ReplyDeleteYep and it will never be out of it. Forever na tayong lubog.
DeleteHayyyy....backward country and Pilipinas.
ReplyDeleteTomoh. Hindi tayo paabante. Paatras tayo.
Deleteokay lang naman makipagrelasyon sa same sex, huwag na lang pakasal . kasi kabaliwan yun . wala naman mabubuo eh.. hehe.
ReplyDeleteHindi naman nila hinihinging magpakasal sa simbahan kasi karamihan sa mga iyan wala namang pakialam sa simbahan. Ang gusto lang nila ay pwede rin sila sa civil wedding kasi dun pwede silang mabawasan ng tax, makakuha ng healthcare, etc. Bago ka magsabi ng kabaliwan, siguraduhin mo munang may laman ang utak mo.
DeleteWala naman mabubuo eh? Wala din naman mabubuo kung isa sa straight couple ay impotent o tinatawag sa tagalog na baog. E kung ang basehan pala ng kasal ay pagkakaanak, dapat hindi rin sila pwedeng ikasala, di ba?
di naman kasi dahil "bubuo" kaya magpapakasal. ang t*nga mo lang!
Delete