Ambient Masthead tags

Sunday, March 15, 2015

Question: Did Maggie Wilson Copy Her Worldbex x Wilcon Winning Entry from Pinterest?

Image courtesy of Facebook: Worldbex Services International (Official Fan Page)


Images courtesy of Pinterest

139 comments:

  1. Nowadays its really hard to determine which is original and copy cut... What in the world is going on.. No originally

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. korek ekat... talino mo talaga grabe! - anastacia lucrecia

      Delete
  2. I smell digital karma.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Conducive sa dengue iyan, parang nakatira sa tabing ilog Pasig ang peg. Malamig sa mata pero hindi practikal, delikado pa

      Delete
  3. To be fair the dining table is not the only thing they're judging. The winning team must have ticked all if not most boxes of the judges criteria.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The judges are stupid..

      Delete
    2. When you examine the chairs used.. Iisipin mo wala namang ginaya. Pero ang mini falls at the end of the table.. NAKAKATAAS NG KILAY! Hahaha

      Delete
    3. Obvious naman na gusto magpalakas ng mga judges na pulpol sa mga Consunji. #peraperalang

      Delete
    4. What is the criteria for judging then?

      Delete
  4. Mukhang inspiration lang.. not imitation naman..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yan din naisip ko! and besides why blame maggie? team cla na gumawa nyan.

      Delete
    2. ok lang mangopya, pero sana sinigurado nilang cinite nila yung inspiration nila...

      Delete
    3. Si magie daw ang nag "ISIP" ng idea na yan! Hahahhahahahah

      Delete
    4. sa akin imitation ito. ibahin mo ang chair, gawin mong bench. tapos sa halip na conventional stick legs, gawin na inverted pyramid. then copy paste the elements of surrounding water and plants. ano bago sa design nila bukod sa leg form? wala. therefore, imitation.

      Delete
  5. Apartment 8 clothing ikaw ba yan? Hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good thing you brought this up. This is a good example of imitation vs inspiration. Ang mga gawa ng Apartment8, obvious na IMITATION. Kopyang kopya, nothing new to offer to the public and most importantly, it CLAIMS na sila ang original (just like fake LV bags out there). It is geared to confuse people into believing na sila ang orig. Whereas sa issue ng team ni Maggie, it's INSPIRATION dahil they did not blatantly copy the entire setup. They offered something new (and creative) dahil they conceptualized that table by incorporating Angkor Wat features dun sa legs since they were given the theme "Cambodia". Ok they may have seen that design sa Pinterest (who knows) but the important thing is they did not copy dahil "wala lang". They can justify their design and prove that it's within the concept. Even the water feature is still within the concept. Now if you can find a table COMPLETELY similar to that, that's when you can start to question who copied who. This is just about justifying the design but regarding winning the competition, ibang story na yan.

      Delete
    2. Where do you actually draw the line between inspiration vs imitation? Although elements of the design is still within concept, it is for a fact been done as shown in the pictures above. Also it is not creativity when a designer copies the whole structure of the table then just decides to change the leg form. Plus, whether or not they copied within their design's concept or "dahil wala lang", it is still copying.
      This design is a copy since most design elements in the picture pegs can be found in their design (the surrounding water, the plants, etc.)

      Delete
  6. for a contest, dapat original pati ang concept nila maggie. so for that, hindi nga dapat sila nanalo, dahil obviously, may pinagkopyahan ang group nila maggie. and besides, hindi din maganda ang pagkakagawa ng waterfalls chorva nila, hindi man lang smooth ang flow ng tubig.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nothing is original anymore my dear. To be a good designer, you have to innovate, develop and recreate original ideas and make it your own.

      Delete
    2. Kaya naman pala, ang innovation is baguhin lang ang legs nung table. =))

      Delete
  7. kailangan p b pagtalunan yn? kita nmn yun ebidensya eh...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Omg! Copycat nga na talaga! Kapalmuks pa niya na arumintado. Hahaha!

    ReplyDelete
  9. but what did you expect from maggie wilson really? if not for her husband's money i doubt she'd even be there competing against poor students.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Kaya pala nag puputok ang buchi ni ateng! GUILTY !

    ReplyDelete
  11. lahat naman ata ngaun kopya na... its like an unwritten rule

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. even so, that doesn't make it right, dear.

      Delete
    2. Specially to have 90% of one's contest entry similar to the supplied photos above....The only difference is the table bottom having inverted pyramids and the cracked wall with the gold pyramid in the middle.

      Delete
  12. the mere fact na madaming merong water flowing from the table design means maraming nakakaisip ng ganon.. inspiration lang probably..

    ReplyDelete
  13. All money, no brains.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks to Consunji ;) she has all the connections so whether we like it or not, compared to others who are more creative and talented she will make it big...but I feel pity because without Consunji will she make it big? Will she be able to have such a lavish lifestyle continuously? But at least she's trying to improve herself by studying;)

      Delete
  14. Team Maggie Wilson
    ang

    Tamara Ecclestone ng pinas:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tamara was born rich. Hindi na niya kailangang umasawa ng mayaman para maging mayaman unlike noveau rich Maggie. Get your facts straight.

      Delete
    2. rich din family ni maggie,para sa akin siya si tamara sosyal na sosyal.thank u anon 8:33

      Delete
    3. Tamara is a billionaires daughter Maggie is not.

      Delete
  15. It's not a copy. More of inspiration. Yes, she may have gotten the idea of putting waterfalls at the end of the table but the overall design of their booth really interpreted their Cambodian theme. I don't know why there's an issue here. The tables and overall set up from pinterest is very different.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. aay girl, mostly nipa hut lng ang bahay sa cambodia not unless, sa hotel yan gagamitin

      Delete
    2. Un angkor wat daw un inspiration nila dyan.. un nasa ilalim ng table base! hahahaha

      Delete
    3. huh? Anong sense ng comment mo? Eh ano kung puros nipa hut ang mga bahay sa Cambodia? Eh yung mga temples naman dun obviously ang naging inspiration especially yung paa ng table. At ano pinagsasasabi mo na gagamitin sa hotel? Sinabi bang ginawa nila yung booth nila for a hotel. Booth lang yan na may Cambodian theme. Wag ka lumayo sa topic. Ang labo mo.

      Delete
    4. Uyyyy groupmate ni Maggie yan hahaha tulog na!

      Delete
    5. 1:07 Maggie tulog k n! pano ngkaron ng cambodian theme dyan kung puros nipa hut ang bahay don? WALA akong sinabi s hotel yn gagamitin. Ang sinabi ko NOT UNLESS sa hotel yan gagamitin. Magkaiba yun. Besides, WALA rin sinabi na temple yun inspiration nila kaya HUWAG ka rin gumawa ng istorya! O sino stin ngyn ang lumalayo sa topic, ako ba o ikaw? hahaha!

      Delete
    6. Time to be creative. The theme is Cambodia in general so it means you can get inspiration from anything Cambodian not just their houses. Also, it's called inspiration, meaning, if you were given a job to design a house inspired by a certain country, you don't do it by designing the area as if it's an actual house there. If I choose to be inspired by the smallest thing that reminds me of Cambodia, so be it. Think deeper.

      Delete
    7. Anon 9:27 Ang babaw mo naman. Kailangan talaga nipa hut din ang itsura ng booth nila? Theme nga eh! Hindi sinabi na dapat actual Cambodian house or dining area. You take inspiration from the biggest down to the smallest things that may be connected to Cambodia. Mema ka eh..Mema i-comment lang.

      Delete
    8. Well said anon 11:28! Yung iba dito nagmamarunong. The idea was to incorporate certain elements from Cambodian culture to the designs, meaning anything Cambodian( temples, forests, etc) hindi yung kung ano design mismo ng mga bahay. If they wanted the designs to be exactly like Cambodia's houses eh di talo na sila dahil simple lang most houses dun and hello, san dun yung creativity? Pls yung iba before ranting and bashing know the rules first. Also, if you see UP'sc design it wasn't unique either, specially the furniture & wall ornaments. And no, I am not Maggie or anyone from Sofa. I'm an interior designer and my friends joined the the competition from 2 years ago.

      Delete
    9. uhm actually literal nga yung translation niya ng Angkor Wat sa interior.

      Delete
  16. inspiration or imitation ba ito? apartment8 lang ang peg

    ReplyDelete
  17. Sofa.. SCHOOL OF FASHION AND MAARTS.. (MAARTE) well sabi nga walang pinterest sa board exam.. hahaha so bayad na lang kau para makakuha ng license!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Off-topic but my friends and I, before transferring to Raffles, went to SoFA because we were told they were the best. The first few months were chill but guess what lol, they started ripping our parents off on the fifth month so we left

      Delete
  18. I dont think she did. She may have utilized a similar table, yes. Pero the concept is different.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ang pag kaka alam ko kasi pag sinabing competition lalo na sa design you have to come up with something fresh and new.. out of the box.. hindi un kokopya ka sa idea ng iba.. buking na ngabna kinopya idedepensa pa na hindi.. ang tawag dyan Tamad na interior design.. kopya lang ng kopya.. dagdag bawas.. edit lang then kanya ma un design. Hahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. as if naman ung entry ng UP eh original

      Delete
    2. sige anonymous maghanap ka ng ka-peg na pic ng up ha na mismong copy paste na pinaltan lang katiting na detail gaya ng table legs na ginawa nila for this cambodia theme :))

      Delete
  20. Inspiration lang. Di naman sya super gaya, I mean it has the same concept but different structure. Halos lahat naman ng designs inspired from something. The judges and all interior designers know that. Yung sa UP booth din naman the wall ornament and chairs di unique sa kanila and has been around for quite some time na.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you. Unless part of the rule is to come up with an original concept, I think it was ok for them to do this. Pag gumawa ba ang designer ng square na table pede na ding sabihing kinopya since may nauna ng nakaisip nun? Ang OA lang for me na gawing issue to.

      Delete
    2. I think part of the rule is all items must come from wilcon, kaya mahirap magpaka- original if provided na beforehand yung form ng items.

      Delete
    3. Alam mo kung bakit may mga certain furnitures and fixtures na pare-parehas ( like the mirror used in UP's booth was also used in some other booth) kasi may isang supplier ang mga booth which is wilcon. Maging observant ka naman. Most probably magkakaparehas sila ng gagamitin. But if you look how it was designed, mahahalata mo na copied siya. Look at how elements were arranged. The photo above and the work of this maggie looks the same.

      Delete
    4. Ay wehhhhhh? Kung ganun, ang galing ng other booths since na utilize nila ng maigi yung supplied items, unlike this water design na copy paste ang peg.

      Delete
  21. I don't think ginaya. Kumbaga trend siya.

    ReplyDelete
  22. poor students. hapless and penniless against the likes of maggie wilson.

    ReplyDelete
  23. If there is already a trend for this type of design (i.e., table with waterfall feature), then I think it would be inappropriate to present an on-going trend in a design competition.

    These competitions are platforms to see how creative the minds of the participants are, to inspire new concepts and designs, NOT to present designs that are already trending in the market place. The participants are supposed to be able to present new ideas to the audience and inspire the next wave of designs. This is why people are having a big problem with this whole issue. It's not about the furniture placement or difference in materials used, it's the design concept and idea NOT being fresh and innovative, which are essentially, the principles behind a design competition, in the first place. Are we to believe that the judges were impressed with the design and thought it to be a forward-thinking presentation?

    So, yeah, emotions aside, even I wonder what it was they saw, what separated Maggie Wilson's design from the rest of the pack, and what criteria did they use to judge it as the winning design overall.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said anon 2:07 am. Thanks for that.

      Delete
    2. Dapat ang comment mo 2:07 nasa pinaka first position ng comments board. Tama lahat ng sinabi mo.

      Delete
    3. O sige ha. Following your logic, lahat ng sumasali sa design competition all over the world of let's say, furniture, na nag submit ng square or rectangle na table gawan nyo rin ng issue ha!

      "The participants are supposed to be able to present new ideas to the audience and inspire the next wave of designs. This is why people are having a big problem with this whole issue. It's not about the furniture placement or difference in materials used, it's the design concept and idea NOT being fresh and innovative, which are essentially, the principles behind a design competition, in the first place." Seriously? As if naman yung entry ng UP is earth-shatteringly original. Before you accuse the other team of getting their ideas off Pinterest, siguraduhin no na hindi in kayo kumuha ng idea dun. Sorry to say, but your entry, aside from it having way too much going on, is actually very generic. No wow factor.



      Delete
    4. cause others booth were too cliche and simple. Even up's, i was kinda disappointed. I expected more. Kudos to the organizers of world bex. I had legit fun. As an architecture student of UPD all i can say is that nothing wrong with that. And to the UP people, hey remember our school's mantra please, honor before excellence. Why rant on social media, can't decipher why would you resort into this kind of ploy, because you can't accept the fact that you didn't won and your ego id just too big.

      Delete
    5. "O sige ha. Following your logic, lahat ng sumasali sa design competition all over the world of let's say, furniture, na nag submit ng square or rectangle na table gawan nyo rin ng issue ha!"

      That doesn't make any sense. Tables with straight edges have become a standard because they are practical for users. And okay lang naman sana if they used this floating dining table idea, just don't claim it as their own kasi competition yan eh. Sana nilagay na may reference sila for that design. Kasi to me, it looks like everything was blatantly copied at tinailor-fit lang to the Cambodian theme by adding Angkor Wat elements.

      And maganda naman sya talaga, pero if "wow factor" lang naman hinahanap mo, edi wag ka nang maging designer. Better to present a "cliche and simple" design than one that's not only impractical, but also hazardous.

      Delete
    6. 7.41, pls study your grammar lessons. - from a concerned UP student

      Delete
    7. honor and excellence po koya

      Delete

    8. I don't think this anon 7:41 is from UP. Dude honor goes with excellence. If you're a real design student, you should see how the booth brought us all back to philippine colonial period. At kung UP Arki ka, gumagawa din tayo ng paper ano po. Mag eng 10 ka parang awa mo na. -from a legit UP ARKI student

      Delete

    9. I don't think this anon 7:41 is from UP. Dude honor goes with excellence. If you're a real design student, you should see how the booth brought us all back to philippine colonial period. At kung UP Arki ka, gumagawa din tayo ng paper ano po. Mag eng 10 ka parang awa mo na. -from a legit UP ARKI student

      Delete
  24. Nothing wrong with having an inspiration.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. paano naging inspiration e kopyang kopya yung waterfalls??? e sana kung nag offer sila ng bagong concept na inintegrate yung waterfalls din, e hindi e, direktang nilang kinopya yung waterfalls under the table

      Delete
  25. Homaygash?! Plagiarism ba itey?!...yun na! Paaak!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Nakakahiya sa mga Consunji. Nadungisan ang pangalan.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Paano kaya naatim ng isang tao ang award na alam niya di niya deserved????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kapal ng mukha at tibay ng sikmura, dear.

      Delete
  28. Well, it seems like yung table was designed para sa ganyang style, tas yung design talaga nya may tubig sa ibaba tas may parang pader sa gilid, ganyan tlaga yung structure para sa flow yung water. Hindi naman nya pwedeng baguhin yan, otherwise san pupunta yung tubig diba? Edi mag lalamutak yan. I cant see any thing na ginaya nya aside siguro sa color ng ng upuan ayun lang. Pansin ko lang in those 3 photos,they have the same color ng upuan, baka naman yan tlaga yung perfect na color to match the table. (P.S. hindi ako si maggie mwah!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, pero personally parang nakakatakot naman mag dine dyan....

      Delete
    2. ang tamad ng design process. binago lang ang table legs to fit the angkor wat.

      Delete
  29. Hmm pinteresting!!! Maisearch nga si maggie baka may pinterest sya.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I think the idea of the water thingie flowing under the glass of the table cannot be patented for one person to use lang. It's a technology na when done right (like maggie's team did) super bonggels ang effect niya unlike the image from pinterest. It's just like saying di ka original if indirect din ang lighting mo, it's a techinique, it can't be owned by one person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure what you mean by "done right?" Sobrang impractical nga nung design eh.

      Delete
    2. It's not even done right. I went to the exhibit and saw their tiles blanched with water. :( Smooth tiles for this water application? A big NO-NO.

      Delete
  31. Ang bitter ng UP!!! I saw their booth. Ano naman kakaiba doon? Parang nakita ko na nga sa ibang mga bahay yun eh. Labanan ba eh original concept? Ano original sa ginawa din nila? Mas tumatak lang yung booth nila Maggie dahil may kakaiba. Maganda rin siguro ang construction given na asawa niya eh may resources na pwede din nya gamitin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bakit UP lang? Meron naman nagcocomment dun na hindi UP. And it's so sad how people dismiss criticism as "hating" and "bashing," when really it is supposed to help everyone learn

      Delete
    2. Hindi naman claim na UP na dapat sila manalo ang usapin bakit ginaya lang Nila yung design sa iba at competition Ito dapat fresh idea at pano mo masasabi na Ikaw ang nag design yan Kung alam Mong my pinagayahan

      Delete
  32. Sorry to say pero wala naman kasing ooomph factor ung gawa nung UP. Wag nalang nila isisi ung results kaagad sa team ni Maggie. I think there are a number of reasons why hindi sila nanalo talaga.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bakit ba kasi ambilis to judge na pag may nagcocomment sa design nila ay UP? Why single them out sa napakadaming public posts about sa design ng sofa? Hanapin nyo yung post ko. Char! XD

      (estudante mula sa silangan)

      Delete
    2. And there are also a number of reasons why hindi dapat nag-win ang design ng Sofa. (R. Escarez, PWU)

      Delete
  33. jusko halata si ate girl kaya pala defensive ahihhihi

    ReplyDelete
  34. There's a difference between inspiration and imitation. And aside from the obvious copying, the other issue is that the design isn't fit to actually serve as a functional, everyday dining area. As an interior DESIGN (and not decor)competition, the criteria should have fit not just the aesthetics, but also the practicality and usefulness of the area.

    Anyway, I'm from UP, but even I think Indonesia (PUP) should have won. SoFA looks nice, but looks so uncomfortable and uneasy to eat in.

    ReplyDelete
  35. You guys don't know anything about interior design and applying design concept in an actual space, so you don't have the right to say such things to both sides. Have a degree in ID or at least take a year of it before you judge people's design strategies. And the one who's claiming he/she's from UPD arki, i doubt you are being real. WTH is "didn't won".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. eh di ikaw na may bachelors degree sa interior Design! hahahaha

      Delete
    2. I don't have a bachelors degree, but I've been in the program for three years in a design school.

      Delete
  36. i think di naman sinasabi ng UP na sila dapat nanalo. ang sinasabi ay bakit sina maggie. magkaiba kasi yon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's true. OA ng mga tao :))) tsaka may punto naman yung mga taga UP and other commentors...

      Delete
  37. This is not a very practical design for a house or even a restaurant inside the house... It is very dangerous especially for the children, disabled and old people... Interior design isn't just about the design ... It's also about the functionality... I think is is really a bad design...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i agree... form and function should go hand in hand when designing a space for living. yung design ng team ni tita maggi, puro form lang, mahina sa function.

      Delete
  38. They don't deserve winning the title ... All designs must be original when you are joining a contest lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mas deserving pa yung iba na nagpakahirap at Hindi labg nag utosutos na ng mga contractors

      Delete
  39. Sa totoo lang Hindi naman Maganda Yung design Kapag wala ng water Nila na ginaya! Hindi sila deserving

    ReplyDelete
  40. magaling talaga ang Pinoy.... magaling manggaya....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Okay lang sana eh kung binigay nila ng credits yung ORIGINAL NA GUMAWA

      Delete
  41. Medyo hindi busy si maggie ah! To think ange didn't tag anyone. Bato bato sa langit, tamaan eh tamaan na. Kung hindi ka guilty, why bother? Haters gonna hate, potatoes gonna potate.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Interior Design is inspired by nature. Walang masama sa kung kinopya ang waterfall effect na yan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. okay lang kung sa nature nangopya eh. pero pang-ilang degree na ng imitation yah teh?

      Delete
  43. akala ko ba STUDENT Interior design Competition itong OBRA MAESTRA.. bakit naging DMCI HOMES VS ID Universities hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AMEN
      Na Obra sagaya ata nag group nila

      Delete
  44. ang title nang competition diba OBRA MAESTRA ibig sabihin masterpiece, masasabi mo bang masterpiece mo isang bagay kung alam mong nakita na sa iba?

    ReplyDelete
  45. Ang galing galing nya na i-front ang UP. Oi di lang UP ang nagkwekwestyon ng pagkapanalo nyo.
    [Rommel. UST. Microbiology.]

    ReplyDelete
  46. sabi sa wikipedia di raw grad ng HS si maggie. totoo ba? kasi baka lang naman may kinalaman yon sa issue?

    ReplyDelete
  47. nakita nyo ba un mga photos? habang un mga id students from other universities eh hirap na hirap mag set up ng module nila ang mga taga SOFA ayun nanunuod lang sa isang tabi at pinapanuod un mga contractors from DMCI wearing CONSUNJI uniforms to set-up un module nila.. hahahahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ano problema don sila naman ang gumagastos at Hindi Ikaw , Saka Wala naman Sa rule Kung sino gagawa

      Delete
    2. Hoy mga Iska, wala sa contractor yun. Wala sa rules yun. Organizers ang sisihin mo hindi ung contractors. Pero SoFA, wait lang ah. Nakakamatay naman ata yang dining area niyo. Ha? Bakit nga pala kayo ang nanalo. PSID pa rin the best.

      Delete
    3. Maggie tulog na! Hahahahhaa

      Delete
    4. Nakita niyo ba yung post ni Maggie sa ig? Galing niya mag render and mag perspective naiyak ako.. kaya siguro naghanap nalang siya sa pinterest ng picture para icopy Hahah the rest pinagawa nalang sa mag tauhan #buhaymayordoma

      Delete
  48. Pag compare mo naman kasi yung design copy naman talaga ang naiba lang yung legs nang table , material at Saka wall napalitan nang bato pero yung concept same parin at competition Ito dapat fresh idea para worth namn yung award para masasabi mo na Ikaw talaga ang nag design ,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Par Hindi gayang Gaya di apoy nalang dapat ginamit Hindi tubig malamang no issue

      Delete
  49. Actually the legs of the table is really excellent! Even the triangular thing on the wall inspired by Angkor Wat. Plus you can also tell na Cambodia ang theme ng space. It's like a song na nakaka-LSS, maalala mo siya kaagad. Masasabi mo na, "Ah! Sa SoFA toh!" Unlike the other booths na halos same lang. No offense. Pero yeah, nag-stand out nga talaga ung sa SoFA. I really liked it, liked ha. Past tense. Pero when I saw the photos that look so much like the the one SoFA did. Na-turn off ako. Plus the area is just dangerous. And since madaling mabasa ang floor, eh di madudulas kaagad ang user nito, eh di tigok si user. Pano ba yan? I wouldn't risk my life having this kind of space. It would be dangerous to my guests, family, etc. And if you really want to be a good designer, think of the users of the space. Their SAFETY. Crucial ang safety namin. Kaya other schools were wondering why they won? Is it because of the design concept lang? But how about the space planning? Sana man lang they showed the scores of other schools, and gusto rin malaman ng ibang schools kung bakit kayo ang nanalo. Honestly, MAGANDA talaga ang DESIGN CONCEPT niyo. Pero interior design toh eh. Priority ang safety ng users. Kung hindi lang siguro dangerous ito, eh di PERFECT kayo. Hindi na kami magtataka. You just explained them kasi your concept and your inspiration, na well-traveled and all ang students (which is actually good kasi mas lalo ka nga talagang ma-iinspire). Pero ito ha, ang tanong, SAFE ba talaga yan? If so, expound please. Plus UP, walang personalan. Explain it to them ng matino. Mga Iska kayo. Plus hindi lahat ng tao perfect ang grammar.

    Anyhow...

    "Doctors save lives by constructing a healthy life. Designers save lives by constructing a life WORTH living." - Mark W. Perrett

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I sooo love your commnt and your quote! :)

      Delete
    2. I wonder if pwede nga ba na baliktarin ang isang sacred monument...

      Delete
    3. Actually kaya ko lang nalaman na SOFA nagdesign kasi may pangalan yung board nila :)) pero di ko naidentify yung country nila. Akala ko Egypt.
      (Mr. sevilla, PUP)

      Delete
  50. Clearly it's a copy paste design!

    ReplyDelete
  51. hahaha hindi naman sinasabi ng UP na sila dapat ang manalo!

    ReplyDelete
  52. badumtss
    awtsubeh
    kung may alam ka sa design, sasabihin mo, ang chaka.
    space planning: eeengk. pano makakapagserve habang may kumakain? kung ginawa sana nilang 4-seater yan pwede pa.
    material specification: eeeeengk. ano ba beh. nagleleak na nga yung table nyong kinopya nyo sa pinterest nakakadulas pa yung material na inespecify nyo. NAKAMAMATAY. grabe lang. yan na nga lang yung mga iisipin nyo since kinopya nyo na yung design ng table, di nyo pa ginawa ng maayos. ano nalang ginawa nyo? gumawa man lang ba kayo ng floor plan? kasi malamang inasa nyo yung malaking bulk ng construction sa contractor.
    concept: eeeeengk. kahit concept nyo beh, waley. sobrang literal. to be honest, compared sa ibang booth na sobrang thematic, medyo okay yung sa inyo. pero ang literal pa rin. inspiration: angkor wat. ohhhh why dont we use the shape of the angkor wat as the base of the table? para naman di nila masabing kinopya natin yung design na cantilevered table. great idea!! so much innovation. and ohh since napapalibutan ng water and plants yung angkor wat, lets include water and plants in our "design"
    wow lang. at angkor wat lang ba ang meron sa cambodia ha? ha? HA? RAWR (lols)
    ang sakit lang sa loob na ito yung nanalo. ang daming designers na nagpapakahirap patunayan na ang interior design ay hindi puro arte lang at may utak din. tapos ito yung ipapanalo nila. haaaay.
    pero okay lang yan. galingan nyo na lang next time. sana learning experience na to sating lahat. at wag na natin awayin si maggie wilson. kawawa naman. lima silang gumawa dyan ang alam ko. sya lang ata yung sikat kaya sya yung napapansin. ("sikat" lol. di ko nga sya kilala bago yung issueng to.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. floor plans? detail drawings? marunong ba sila nun? hahaha pag drawingin mo yan ng detail drawing and section at cosntruction drawings tignan ko lang kung kaya nila.. hahahah baka tawagin yun mga taga consunji to draw it for them! kaya tama lang yun sinabi ng taga UP sa board exam walang pinterest search.. unless bayaran mo un prc para mag ka license ka as Interior Designer!

      Delete
    2. That's true. Nabahiran tuloy ang buong ID industry dahil ang babaw ng disenyo nila....tsk

      Delete
  53. Kakahiya naman for consunji na damay pa

    ReplyDelete
  54. Originality is the art of concealing your sources

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...